Strange Maps

January 18, 2007

65 - “Eastland, Our Land”: Dutch Dreams of Expansion at Germany’s Expense

Filed under: 20th Century Map, Annexation., Europe, Germany, Netherlands, World War II — strangemaps @

bakker_schut-plan1.JPG

In the Netherlands straight after World War II, there existed plans both official and unofficial to annex a large area of Germany as a way of obtaining war reparations (plans not to be confused with the more fanciful, pre-war plans described in posting #50 on this blog, which were used by the Nazis to scare the Germans into fighting to the bitter end).

Pivotal figure in most annexation schemes was Frits Bakker-Schut, a member of the State Commission for the Study of  Annexation (Staatscommissie ter Bestudering van het Annexatievraagstuk - SBA) and secretary of the (non-governmental) Dutch Comittee for Territorial Enlargement (Nederlandsch Comité voor Gebiedsuitbreiding - NCG).

The SBA’s target immediately after the war was to create momentum within the Netherlands for annexation of German territory. In brochures, it proposed the so-called Wezergrens (’Weser Border’, after the river). The slogan was: Nederlands grens kome aan de Wezer (’Let the Dutch Border Reach the Weser’).

The NCG’s task was to study in specific task forces the feasibility of the plan. The mineral wealth, agricultural area and industrial potential for the intended areas were meticulously charted. The NCG presented its conclusion to the Dutch government at the end of 1945. It became known as the Bakker-Schut-Plan, and proposed three formulas for annexation:

  • Plan A: Annexation of all areas west of the line Wilhelmshaven-Osnabrück-Hamm-Wesel-Cologne-Aachen (including all those cities).

  • Plan B: Basically the same proposal, but excluding the densely populated areas around Neuss, Mönchengladbach and Cologne from annexation.

  • Plan C: The smallest proposed area of annexation, with the border being moved to a line beginning in Varel, including all of Emsland and the Wesel area down towards Krefeld.

Apparently the plans included moves to ’de-Germanise’ the area, among other measures by giving towns a Dutch version of their German name. Some proposed place name changes (German name – Dutch name):

  • Jülich – Gulik

  • Emmerich – Emmerik

  • Selfkant – Zelfkant

  • Kleve – Kleef

  • Aachen – Aken

  • Bad Bentheim – Neder-Benthem

  • Emlichheim – Emmelkamp

  • Geilenkirchen – Geelkerken

  • Geldern – Gelderen

  • Goch – Gogh

  • Moers – Meurs

  • Münster – Munster

  • Neuenhaus – Nieuwenhuis

  • Nordhorn – Noordhoorn

  • Osnabrück – Osnabrugge

  • Veldhausen – Veldhuizen

  • Wesel – Wezel

  • Hoch- Elten – Hoog Elten

  • Jemgum – Jemmingen

  • Köln – Keulen

  • Mönchen-Gladbach – Monniken-Glaabbeek

  • Zwillbrock – Zwilbroek

Another measure to ’Dutchify’ the annexed area was to be population transfers (a bit like in the German areas to the east, which were annexed to Poland, Chzechoslovakia and the Soviet Union). In the folder Oostland – Ons Land (’Eastland – Our Land’), the NCG proposed to expell all people from towns larger than 2.500 inhabitants, all former members of the Nazi party and related organisations, and everybody who had settled in the area after 1933. The rest of the indigenous Germans would have the option of Dutch citizenship – if they spoke plattdeutsch (the local dialect, somewhat closer to Dutch than standard German) and had no close relatives in the rest of Germany. Everybody else was liable to be expelled without receiving compensation.

The Allied High Commission opposed the Dutch annexation plans on the grounds that Germany was already straining to accomodate 14 million refugees from the East. More refugees from the West could destabilise further a situation urgently needing consolidation, to counter the growing Soviet threat on Western Europe. Interestingly, there was also a strong opposition to the plans within the Netherlands, particularly from the churches.

Nevertheless, at the Conference of the Western Occupying Powers of Germany in London (from January 14 to February 25, 1947), the Netherlands officially requested the annexation of 1.840 km² of German territory. This area, a modified and smaller version of the aforementioned Plan C, included the isle of Borkum, the county of Bentheim and a strip of border territory close to the cities of Ahaus, Rees, Kleve, Erkelenz, Geilenkirchen and Heinsberg. In 1946, the area housed about 160.000 people – over 90% German-speaking.The concluding statements of the Germany Conference in London on April 23, 1949, awarded only very small fragments of German territory to the Netherlands – about 20 fragments, typically smaller than 1km² and totalling no more than 69 km².

Most of these were returned to Germany in 1963 and 2002. In fact, the ambitious Dutch annexation plans of 1945 have resulted in only one formerly German area now still under Dutch control: a small area called Wylerberg (in German; Duivelsberg in Dutch) close to the Dutch border city of Nijmegen, measuring no more than 125 hectares. I don’t know whether Mr Bakker-Schut is still alive, but if he is, he must be very, very disappointed… 

This map, showing Plans A, B and C,  retrieved from This page of the German Wikipedia.

11 Comments »

  1. For those who do understand some Dutch (or not -;)) I recommend the may 3th 2001 episode of TV program ‘Andere Tijden’ about this subject, ‘Eisch Duitschen grond!’ You can watch it online.

    Comment by HvI — January 18, 2007 @

  2. Thanks for the link! The background info contains one more interesting map, showing a very ambitious plan for annexation. I apparently can’t copy/paste that image here, so go have a look for yourself if you’re interested, under the title ‘Het kabinet is verdeeld’.

    Comment by strangemaps — January 18, 2007 @

  3. This is interesting. I’ll watch the suggested episode with a friend who is Dutch and grew up in Holland during WWll. He may be able to shed some light on how, at least one Dutch citizen may view the filure of this annexation.

    Comment by suburbanlife — January 18, 2007 @

  4. Interesting item.
    Funny for a dutchman to see all the place names.
    Some of them must have been made up by het comittee, but the names of the bigger cities (Aken, Keulen) are commonly used in this way in the Netherlands.

    Comment by Jasper — January 19, 2007 @

  5. Actually, The Netherlands did gain some territory after WWII, however, no more then 69 square kilometres was gained and later given back: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nederlandse_annexatie_van_Duits_grondgebied_na_de_Tweede_Wereldoorlog#Teruggave (for those that speak Dutch)

    Comment by Arathorn — January 20, 2007 @

  6. [...] Annexation (anyone suggestions?) Posted in Link Dump, Retro and Politic. [...]

    Pingback by Dutch proposed at Ochblog — January 20, 2007 @

  7. I actually got this also in history class in high school, in the netherlands, some 30 years ago. It’t in the standard history textbooks. Basically to show as an example how little people learned from the versaille treaty (which concluded ww 1) and the setup for ww 2 it created.

    So instead of presenting this as new & outragious, better is to present it as a part of the growing pains of the european communicty.

    Comment by o-e — January 20, 2007 @

  8. I don’t think any of the “Dutchified” names are made up; they regularly occur in Dutch family names (van Osnabrugge, van Gulik, van Meurs, van Wezel, van Gogh, etc.)

    Historically and linguistically, most of the A area is strongly connected with regions on the Dutch side of the border - e.g. havign Dutch as an official language for quite some time - and one might say that the actual border is largely a result of historic coincidence.

    Comment by Reinier Post — February 6, 2007 @

  9. Long after 1963, but way earlier than the 2002- return of th eN274 Selfkant road, there was another border correction, I believe in the early 1990s. It included miniscule pieces of land. Even a part of a canal, in which there once had been a ’sluis’or bridge, built by one of the countries and wholly owned by that country. Since it had long gone, at the time of the bordercorrection, the border returned in that small place. So the border was, like everywhere else, at the middle of the canal.

    Who knows more of this (maybe the official treaty language? should be somewhere public). At the time I read a small article about it in the weekly ‘Elsevier’

    I guess ‘we’ the Dutch lost some few hundred square yards at the time…

    best regards,
    Sander

    Comment by Sander Haaijer — May 19, 2007 @

  10. The part of Germany shown in grey seems to be the Länder of Niedersachsen and Nordrhein-Westfalen (plus Bremen, outlined). When were the Länder created?

    Comment by Anton Sherwood — September 13, 2007 @

  11. There is also such a map from the congres of vienna.
    But I cant find it on the internet. I only have a paper version, of that 3 scenario’s.

    Comment by Arjan — January 19, 2008 @

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.