At the beginning of the twentieth century, the Ottoman Empire was called the ‘Sick Man of Europe’ because it didn’t seem able to hold on to its possessions in the Balkans. However, as the Balkan nations managed to cast of the Ottoman yoke, their own overlapping territorial claims led to conflicts that have dominated the region up until the 1990s.
In 1912-13, in the first of two Balkan Wars, the Balkan League (Bulgaria, Montenegro, Greece and Serbia) conquered Macedonia, Albania and most of Thrace, only to turn on each other in the second Balkan War over the division of the territory gained. The main reason for this was the fragmented distribution of the different ethnicities in the Balkans, and after centuries of Ottoman dominance, the absence of well-established borders between them.
As shown in this map, dated 1912:
Servia (later uniformly called ‘Serbia’ in English) was a small, recently independent statelet smaller even than present-day Serbia. Yet it felt compelled to champion the rights of all southern Slavic peoples and extend its reach all the way up to Trieste, at that time part of Austro-Hungary.
Similarly, fairly newly independent Bulgaria aspired to create a ‘Greater Bulgaria’, encompassing all of ancient Macedonia, up to the Greek port city of Salonika. In the nineteen-nineties, disagreements of what constitutes Macedonia (territorially and ethnically) led to disputes between Greece (which sees itself as the heir of a purely Greek Macedonia) and the former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia (called FYROM by its acronym, because of Greece’s objections to use of the name by these Slavic ‘interlopers’).
Romania (then still called ‘Rumania’) wanted to extend its reach to include Bessarabia (presently Moldavia, then part of Russia) and
Transylvania, then part of Austro-Hungary. Both territories are home to large populations of ethnic Romanians.
Greece, at that time consisting only of the peninsula of the Pelopponesos, Athens and surroundings and a small part of the mainland to the north, sought to extend its domain to include Crete, Cyprus, most of the Aegean islands, the southern half of Albania and Macedonia, all the way up to and including Constantinople (present-day Istanbul).
It’s interesting to note that none of these four countries managed to reach the maximum extent of its territorial ‘aspirations’, as shown in this map.
Greece comes close, although its northern border doesn’t quite extend as far north as aspired to in this map – it includes the southern part of Albania, which today is still home to a Greek minority. Also, Turkey managed to hold onto a sliver of Europe beyond Istanbul (Constantinople) that in this map is divided between Greece and Bulgaria. Finally, in 1974 a Greek-sponsored coup on Cyprus, intended to bring the island under the control of the Greek government, led to a Turkish invasion, the split of the island in an unrecognised Turkish and an independent Greek part. In the 1990s, Serbia’s ‘Greater Serbian’ ambitions led to the bloodiest European conflict since the Second World War. Although a Serbian republic was established in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia proper lost all other formerly Yugoslav territories. Even Montenegro, ethnically closest to Serbia, declared its independence from what remained of the Yugoslav federation last year. And though Kosovo nominally still is a Serbian province, in practice it is an independent entity under the tutelage of the United Nations.
Bulgaria’s designs on Macedonia and on access to the Aegean Sea were never realized, and Romania, while managing to incorporate Transylvania after the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, never succeeded in annexing Bessarabia (or Moldova, as it is now known) after it became independent at the end of the twentieth century…



It’s important to note that these small countries were frequently being manipulated by larger powers — in particular, “Big Bulgaria” was more a Russian aspiration than a Bulgarian one, as Bulgaria was firmly in Russia’s sphere of influence and Russian policy at the time was obsessively predicated around the acquisition of a warm-water sea port somewhere in the Mediterranean.
Comment by ben — March 26, 2007 @ 5:43 pm
Bulgaria did have an Aegean coast after the Balkan wars it lost it on account of choosing the wrong side.
While, during the inter-war period, Romania did achieve the aspirational borders on that map. Following the first world war it gained Bessarabia Transylvania, part of Banat and Bukovina. Bessarabia, Northern Bukovia and Southern Dobruja were lost following the second world war
Comment by Brett Dunbar — March 26, 2007 @ 6:49 pm
@ ben,
@ Brett,
Thank you for your insightful additions!
Comment by strangemaps — March 26, 2007 @ 7:07 pm
Bessarabia / Moldova was part of Romania between 1918 and 1940.
Comment by Loxias — March 26, 2007 @ 9:23 pm
“Romania (then still called ‘Rumania’) wanted to extend its reach to include Bessarabia (presently Moldavia, then part of Russia)”
Surely Moldavia is presently called Moldova? Or am I just thinking of the independent state, rather than the whole region?
Comment by Polocrunch — March 27, 2007 @ 1:00 am
Greece gained even more than this map shows in the 1920 Treaty of Sevres (including the area around Smyrna, modern Izmir) but lost it (ratified in the treaty of Lausanne), and in the process all the ethnic Hellenes living in Asia Minor were forced to migrate to modern Greece in what is known as Mikro Asiya Katastrophe (I am making up the spelling: The Asia Minor Catastrophe).
Comment by jd2718 — March 27, 2007 @ 4:12 am
Hello!
I’m writing you from Barcelona, Europe.
Have you ever heard about this website?
http://maps.bpl.org/
You have a great site!
Renton
Comment by Renton — March 27, 2007 @ 6:26 am
if you take the maps put out by various ethnicities for their homelands and consider them like venn diagrams one soon realises that no part of their schemes and dream of nation state purity escape an intersection, even without Imperial dreams.
The EU as a Common Empire is a wonderful thing, despite the depauperate nature of the number of nations making up it membership.
Comment by meika — March 27, 2007 @ 7:04 am
i wonder if there are maps connecting further to budapest. nice map.
Comment by Raymond Lee Quijano — March 27, 2007 @ 9:57 am
Thank’s to joint the Map’s reference when extract from a publication
Best regard
Christian
Comment by Germanaz — March 27, 2007 @ 10:17 am
Moldova is the “official” name of the present time state, former republic of SSSR; Moldavia is the name applied to Western Moldova (now in Romania: 1856 – Paris Conference + 1858 – local popular consultations + 1859 – election of one person as both prince of Moldova and prince of Vallachia = The United Principalities, later renamed Romania) or to historical principality of Moldova.
the map is not terribly exact and
it does not present the “aspirations” of the Balkan states, but what were the Balkan states encouraged to believe they could get if they chose to support the parties interested in controlling the Bosphorus straits and the Lower Danube.
Bulgaria claimed Dobruja (according to the spelling on the map), and Romania claimed a sliver of territory South of Dobruja (granted/promised to Romania by the treaty of Berlin, 1878, promise not put in practice by the commission that redrew the borders, gained in 1913, lost in 1939).
some details:
Bessarabia (name on the map) applies only to the southern part of what the map identifies as Bessarabia, probably owned by Vallachia around 1400 and then certainly by Moldova for a few decades during the XVth century, lost to the Ottoman empire and occupied by the Russians in 1812. The rest of Bessarabia was, with some border fluctuations towards the North, part of Moldova between the end of the XIVth century up to 1812. Bessarabia proper was granted to the soon to be united principalities of Moldova and Vallachia in 1856, after the Crimeean war: modern Romania was founded then as a buffer state between Russia and the lower Danube valley and Istanbul, the same way Belgium was created so no major power would control the Rhine and the port of Anvers. Bessarabia was lost by Romania to the Russians in 1878, and Dobruja was forced upon Romania as a compensation. By forced I mean: the Romanians refused the exchange and were ready to embark on a suicidal war with Russia on their own, and they took some persuading from the rest of European powers that it was not a good idea. The name of “Bessarabia” extended then to all of Eastern Moldova + historic Bessarabia.
Romania/Rumania began having claims to Transylvania only during the WWI ; before that there was some talk about it, but the general public and the official stance was “we’re friends with Austria, we care only if Romanians in Austria are ersecuted”. During WWI Romania had to chose sides since by 1916 both the Russians and the Austrians were violating it’s neutrality and fighting each other on Romanian territory in the North and on the Danube, and Transylvania + the overlapping area between the Romanian “claims” and the Serbian claims + Bukowina (North-Western corner of Western Moldova, lost to Austria in 1784) were offered as bribe.
Comment by Emil Per. — March 27, 2007 @ 10:47 am
@ Emil Per:
Thank you for your very detailed account!
Comment by strangemaps — March 27, 2007 @ 11:33 am
Hence the verb “to balkanize”
http://m-w.com/dictionary/balkanize
Comment by Evan — March 27, 2007 @ 1:21 pm
For a highly readable account of life in in the declining years of the Ottoman Empire, try Louis de Bernieres “Birds Without Wings”.. The island people of the story are a polyglot stew of Christian Greek and Muslim Turks, who blend their religions and language, and live simply and in (relative!) harmony in their remote village. World War I, Gallipoli, the rise of Ataturk and Turkish nationalism, pogroms and ethnic cleansing give a fascinating insight into this corner of Europe.
Comment by Geoff — March 27, 2007 @ 1:42 pm
I think the moral of the story is: nationalism is really bad for you and can cause genocide.
Comment by Alex — March 27, 2007 @ 3:43 pm
Actually Bulgaria did briefly achieve most of its territorial aspirations during WII, when it took large swathes of Greek and Yugoslav territory as a Nazi ally.
Comment by BMG — March 28, 2007 @ 2:39 pm
What Ben’s said in comment 1 is most definitely not true.
All countries (not only Bulgaria) have been influenced by the powerfuls of that time, but not to that extent – the theritorial aspirations are based entirely on historical background and past borders, but never on economic or political interests of 3rd parties.
Bulgarian aspirations are based on the borders of the Bulgarian Exarchate established roughly 50 years before the time the map was published. It is considered that it reflects pretty closely the borders of the territories where population of Bulgarian ethnicity is a majority.
Comment by Plamen — March 29, 2007 @ 1:23 pm
Transylvania was part of Hungary this is why it belonged to the Austro-Hungarian monarchy!
It became the part of Rumania when Hungary lost two-thirds of its territory in 1920 at the Treaty of Trianon.
It was not Austria that Rumania was in conflict with, it was Hungary.
Comment by vera — March 29, 2007 @ 2:44 pm
[...] Intreaga discutie o aveti aici: http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/91-early-20th-century-balkan-aspirations/ [...]
Pingback by Zvoner.ro » Balcanii, aspiratii nationale in anii 1912… — April 4, 2007 @ 7:36 pm
@ vera
It’s almost the same thing: Austria was an ally of Hungary. Emil Per.’s statement is quite true. Austria as a country did not induce any teritorial loss on its own to Romania. The Austro-Hungarian Empire following the lines of Hungary did persecute other ethnicities, the only ones being recognised were hungarians and germans – not romanians, gipsies, other small minorities -
Comment by Adrian I. — April 14, 2007 @ 7:43 am
@vera: Romanians under the Hungarian administration weren’t recognized as an official nation of the empire as well as other and this led to the Austrian-Hungarian empire disintegration. When the Hungarian politicians saw the danger of the total anihilation of Hungary after the WWI, they even discussed about an union with Romania, ruled by a German dinasty!
Comment by Vlad — May 5, 2007 @ 11:20 am
Very intristing map. the most maschraeted people in balkan area are the albanian . Now Kosovo is waitng the independance, bot the ÇAM people (from Albania)have no justice for their lands, now in Grek known border. this confischated land by greck authority are in sell, after a massacre in 1948. but nowbody tell about it.
Comment by ben.al — May 17, 2007 @ 5:31 pm
thanks Ben for your comments. Bulgarian aspirations where not so much about Bulgaria but about Russian attempys to dominate southward.
“Ben.al” The Cam issue is interesting but if that is the case than huge swaths of what is now Albania belong to Greece and Greeks thrown out, part of Greece belongs to Bulgaria, part of Bulgaria belongs to Greece, etc.
History did not begin or end with any one group’s explusion.
Just looking up the Cam issue, the real culprit seems to be the British. It seems London ordered the destruction of the Cam villages due to the siding of the Cams with the Nazis.
Comment by Dave — May 23, 2007 @ 3:57 pm
Hi there
Choice map! It helped me with a histroy assignment about why Austria- Hungary was threatened by Serbia. Where did you find it? I need to reference it accurately. Thanks! :)
Comment by Jessika — June 8, 2007 @ 12:18 am
@ Jessika:
When I don’t reference a map, it’s because I don’t recall where I downloaded it from. I’m half-sure this one can be found at the Perry-Castaneda map collection.
Comment by strangemaps — June 8, 2007 @ 6:34 am
Thank’s to joint the Map’s reference when extract from a publication
Best regard
Comment by Wezp Directory — June 10, 2007 @ 1:11 am
Kind regards
Comment by zuqy — June 19, 2007 @ 8:23 pm
“Ben.al” First about the Cam issue.
The were thrown out by greek partizans, the EDES. Do you know the reason? They did not only cooparated
with the occupation forces during 1941-1944, but they are also responsible for the killings of a lot of greek people. In Paramythia they are responsible of murdering more than 50 people. And it’w not only this. So when the German left the Greeks seek for revenge because of all they have suffered.
Second in South Albania or Northern Epirus as we Greeks call the region
there is a strong greek minority and they are often depressed by the
albanian authority but.. nobody tells about them.
Comment by Tom — June 21, 2007 @ 11:39 pm
very interesting map.
Comment by dynn — July 29, 2007 @ 12:20 pm
nice and interesting findings.
Comment by Lirik Lagu — August 1, 2007 @ 3:10 pm
strangemaps, you do indeed have a WONDERFUL site – keep up the good work.
ONE CAVEAT: it would be a very good idea (especially if you are producing a book) to run your map descriptions by people with special expertise in the areas covered by each map.
This is ESPECIALLY true for historical maps, and MOST CRITICAL for disputed or controversial bits of turf like the Balkans.
Otherwise you risk getting key facts wrong, or relying on one-sided (or at the very least less than objective) interpretations.
Comment by Sea Shanty Irish — August 2, 2007 @ 2:26 am
Vlad — May 5, 2007
dear Vlad, after WWI and Trianon Treaty hungarians weren’t recognized as official nation of big Romania also :))
Comment by daco-roman — November 21, 2007 @ 2:42 pm
Bessarabia was just a portion of Moldavia, so it’s incorrect to say that Romania wanted to take Moldavia, when the core land of Moldavia was already in Romania; and when Romania was founded by the-then Moldavia which remained its own state.
Comment by Anittas — February 25, 2008 @ 5:39 pm
Very interesting story…thanks for sharing.
Comment by Entire Bid — April 10, 2008 @ 1:20 pm
http://www.iyiprogramlar.com
Comment by jozeff — May 16, 2008 @ 12:53 pm
[...] the name, not all the maps are really strange, though some certainly are. You have maps from fiction, maps from history, maps from researchers [...]
Pingback by There Goes Another Hour — June 2, 2008 @ 8:24 pm
thanks alot
Comment by Tony — May 4, 2009 @ 2:34 am
thanks for this map.
good
luck
Comment by Solomon — May 11, 2009 @ 7:21 am
merci
Comment by aspicco . — May 17, 2009 @ 5:10 am
@Tom,
Is killing of 50 people (greek) an excuse for ethnic cleansing and asimilating of 150.000 people(albanians)? I don’t think so. BTW, Greeks took over albanian lands after Congress of Berlin in 1878, too.
Dear readers, it is a fact that after fall of Otoman Empire, most of Balkan states expanded their teritories in the back of albanian territories. Thank you
Comment by PRN — June 8, 2009 @ 3:07 pm
teşekkür ederim
Comment by yory — June 12, 2009 @ 8:47 pm
Vielen Dank
Comment by moon — July 3, 2009 @ 4:01 am
Muchas gracias
Comment by sun — July 4, 2009 @ 6:49 am
i think that people will understand why balkans were called europe`s powder barrel
Comment by razvan — October 4, 2009 @ 7:02 pm
After French shameful defeats, in Sedan on 1870, on 1914 and 1940, France is doing whatever it takes to kip down Germany and Austria-Hungary. Since then, France, in a fierce struggle for existence, is denying the right of Germans, Austrian, Hungarian, Croatian, Bosnian, and Bulgarian to exist. The Trianon treaty turned the nationalities of Eastern Europe, who had always lived in coexistence, into sworn enemies.
French are enough ignorant not to understand that:
The Red Army, with 360 divisions, equipped with prestigious artillery, supported by armor, and decent air force, would invade them and stop at the Biscay Bay. They ignore the Anglo Americans efforts, and their ultimate sacrifices to save them. What goes around comes around. One day they will get what are looking for, but this day will be the last day of Europe too.
Comment by the Truth — October 29, 2009 @ 1:40 am