Strange Maps

July 6, 2007

138 – The Schlieffen Plan

Filed under: 20th Century Map, Europe, Germany, Non-Fictional, Political, Tactical/Military — strangemaps @ 10:36 pm

schlieff.jpg

In 1905, count Alfred von Schlieffen, Chief of Staff of the German Army, developed a plan to win the impending war with France and Russia. In the time it would take Russia to mobilise, a swift campaign on the Western front would defeat France, allowing the troops to then be shipped to the Eastern front. Thus, a Blitzkrieg (‘lightning war’) in the West would prevent a ‘Zweifrontenkrieg’ (a war on two fronts) and ensure a German victory.

Shortly before the outbreak of the war in 1914, Schlieffen’s successor count Helmut von Moltke adapted the plan: German forces would attack France from the north and south, squeezing the French into submission and subsequently meeting at Paris. This adaptation required invading neutral Belgium, which as it turned out would result in Britain declaring war on Germany – upgrading what already was a big continental war into the First World War.

The Schlieffen Plan didn’t work as foreseen: the German offensive came to a standstill at the Marne, the Russians mobilised quicker than the Germans thought and invaded East Prussia. Germany’s Western offensive didn’t prove to be the ‘Blitzkrieg’ they thought it would be. The war ground to a halt and became a deadly stalemate for the next three years.

And yet, the Germans fought the Second World War broadly along the lines of the Schlieffen Plan. In 1940, the ‘Blitzkrieg’ did go according to plan: France and the Benelux were defeated in a matter of weeks – but the Eastern campaign proved disastrous, and All was less than Quiet on the Western front… perhaps proving the dictum that each war is fought with the tactics best suited for the previous one. Or something like that.


16 Comments »

  1. Actually, the original Schlieffen plan called for also violating the neutrality of the Netherlands as well as that of Belgium and Luxembourg. Arguably, they could have captured Paris in the initial push had they taken the wider arc.

    Comment by Leo Petr — July 7, 2007 @ 12:46 pm

  2. You are right about the adaptation, it seems: the original plan called for going through the Netherlands aswell, the revised one only for going through Belgium.

    Comment by strangemaps — July 7, 2007 @ 1:23 pm

  3. The map is misleading; the Plan foresaw encircling Paris from the north-west, not marching straight at it. Famously, the Germans didn’t quite do it and von Kluck ended up east of the city, not west.

    Comment by Alex — July 8, 2007 @ 2:09 pm

  4. “…developed a plan to win the impending war with France and Germany.”

    Wow, I never learned about the German Civil War in school! :)

    Comment by Joel — July 17, 2007 @ 12:51 am

  5. @Joel:
    Arh, didn’t notice that slip-up. Correcting, thanks.

    Comment by strangemaps — July 17, 2007 @ 6:48 am

  6. The WWII plan, Sichelschnitt, was not the same as the Schlieffen Plan. For one, it went towards the Channel instead of driving for Paris.

    The French were only ’saved’ from the brilliant Schlieffen Plan by a Miracle. This resulted in a stalemate instead of a quick German victory. Millions of lives were wasted as a result.

    Comment by Vern — July 21, 2007 @ 3:25 pm

  7. Agree with previous comments. There are MUCH better maps to illustrate SP without the errors previously noted.

    BTW, what’s the SOURCE for this map?

    Comment by Sea Shanty Irish — July 31, 2007 @ 3:10 am

  8. Judging from the term “Imperialisten”, The source is most likely a publication leaning toward the political left, such as any from East Germany.
    While non-leftist publications probably would not object to the idea that plans such as this one received support from imperialists, they would seem less likely to include that term in a map caption.

    Comment by j — August 2, 2007 @ 2:50 pm

  9. At the Naval War College in 1978, I did a paper on the Schleiffen Plan. I considered the reason for failure. But for perspective, I mentioned that the French had a plan too. (I think Plan XXII). I mentioned that nobody studies it because it didn’t almost work.
    WW I was an accident. It happened because the Schliffen Plan was activated when it shouldn’t have been. I commented that war would never have happened under Bismark.
    I ended with this little poem:

    On the planes of desolation
    Rest the bones of countless millions, who,
    at the dawn of victory:
    Sat down to rest.

    Comment by Chas — August 4, 2007 @ 1:40 pm

  10. The Schleiffen plan also required at least two corps to be provided by Italy to hold the southern end of the German line. Moltke, obviously, couldn’t get these troops and had to adjust the plan.

    Comment by Brendan — August 16, 2007 @ 7:46 pm

  11. Very nice and addictive blog. :)

    This map almost certainly comes from East Germany, to be seen from the caption, as “j” already noted, which is usual GDR language. To be more precise, I suspect that this map was created as school material, e.g. to be drawn on the blackboard (therefore the short summary of the plan and its aims in the lower right corner).

    Comment by Varana — February 19, 2009 @ 6:01 pm

  12. thank you

    Comment by Tony — May 4, 2009 @ 2:53 am

  13. thanks for this map..
    good 
    luck

    Comment by Solomon — May 11, 2009 @ 7:43 am

  14. teşekkür ederim

    Comment by yory — June 12, 2009 @ 9:37 pm

  15. Vielen Dank

    Comment by moon — July 3, 2009 @ 4:37 am

  16. Muchas gracias

    Comment by sun — July 4, 2009 @ 7:08 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.