Strange Maps

September 11, 2007

174 - The Nine Nations of North America

Filed under: Uncategorized — strangemaps @

Forget about the United States of America, forget about Canada and about Mexico. North America might be divided into these three states, but the northern half of the American continent is actually made up of nine nations. Those weren’t on any map until 1981, when Joel Garreau published ‘The Nine Nations of North America’.

In this book, Garreau argued that those nine regions demonstrate such distinctive cultural and/or economic features, that they are a more relevant way of dissecting North America than the traditional (Canadian) provinces and (US and Mexican) states. Those Nine Nations are:

New England (or New Britain, or Atlantica): comprising not just the six traditional New England states (Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut), but also the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland (including Labrador). Its capital would be Boston.
The Foundry: the (formerly) industrial heartland of North America, covering the US and Canadian sides of the Great Lakes region and including much of the US northeast. Capital: Detroit.
Dixie: The cultural area more or less corresponding with the secessionist Confederate States of America (1861-1865), but for example excluding western Texas, the southern tip of Florida and including southern Missouri, Illinois and Indiana and southeastern Oklahoma (known as ‘Little Dixie’). Capital: Atlanta.
The Breadbasket: includes most of the Great Plains states (in the US) and part of the Prairie provinces (in Canada). To wit: Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, North and South Dakota, Oklahoma, parts of Missouri, Wisconsin, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana and Texas; and on the Canadian side parts of Ontario, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Capital: Kansas City.
The Islands: basically a federation of the Carribean – the islands and their people. I.e. also the Greater Miami area, heavily Cuban by now, and the Florida Keys. Could stretch all the way across the Caribbean Islands to include parts of Venezuela. Its capital would be Miami.
Mexamerica: those areas in which ‘tex-mex’ culture is prominent, i.e. most of northern Mexico, and a large area in the south of the US - most of New Mexico and parts of California, Arizona and Texas. Its capital could either be Mexico City or Los Angeles. Some later maps include all of Mexico in this Nation.
Ecotopia: A big chunk of coastal Northwest America, from Alaska via British Columbia through Washington State and Oregon to California. Capital: San Francisco.
Québec: the only part of North America that is institutionally non-Anglophone. Capital of this French-speaking enclave would be Québec City.
• The Empty Quarter: All the other, sparsely populated areas of North America, from Northern Canada down to Utah. The name refers to the desert of the same name, occupying the lower third of the Arabian peninsula (Rub’ al-Khali in Arabic). Capital: Denver.

Garreau’s subdivision of the North American continent is the best-known example of what one might call bioregionalism or ‘ecoregionalism’. This term, first emerging in the 1970s, puts great value on the ‘politics of place’. Which means that the basis for policy and analysis are geographical areas, defined by their natural or cultural - but in any case ‘organic’ - boundaries (such as watersheds or prevalent type of industry).

It must be said that Garreau’s subdivision doesn’t necessarily correspond with other bioregionalisms, such as those in Cascadia (a bioregion covering parts of the US and Canadian Pacific coastal areas, but rarely as extensively as in Garreau’s Ecotopia) or Katuah (in the Southern Appalachians). Furthermore, as his ‘Nine Nations’ are by now more than 25 years old, it would be interesting to see whether they need updating – have their ‘contents’ or borders shifted?

Joel Garreau (°1948) currently works as journalist, editor (at the Washington Post) and policy wonk (at the School of Public Policy at George Mason University). His best-known work still is the ‘Nine Nations of North America’ (1981). His latest major book is ‘Radical Evolution’ (2005), describing the human race’s possible evolution, via emerging bio- and other technologies, into something post-human. Garreau maintains a website at www.garreau.com.

This map was suggested to me by many readers, among whom Steve Stackhouse, the stapler, paulbeard, LJ Faucher and James L. Erwin. I’ve held off publishing this map while I was on the lookout for an original map (i.e. on the cover of the book) with higher resolution than this one. But maybe this way somebody who has one might be prompted to send it in...

Update: thanks to Paul Attinello for the hi-res image!

61 Comments »

  1. Similarities to #163 putting regions together by common interest. Good effort. I do love your blog

    Comment by lordhutton — September 11, 2007 @

  2. @ lordhutton:
    Thank you, milord!

    Comment by strangemaps — September 11, 2007 @

  3. “Québec: the only part of North America that is institutionally non-Anglophone.”

    Um. I’d say that Mexamerica and The Islands would be institutionally non-Anglophone. Or in reality, Mexico is non-Anglophone, nor is much of the Carribbean.

    Comment by cephyn — September 11, 2007 @

  4. I’d caution against lumping all of the present-day Province of Quebec into the new region of Quebec. There are some significant parts, such as the area southeast of Montreal, that are historically Anglophone, and are populated today by the descendants of Loyalists who fled during the Revolution. A number of the fishing outposts on the north shore of the St. Lawrence south of Labrador are English, as well.

    Comment by Matvey — September 11, 2007 @

  5. I was thinking along the same lines as Matvey but in relation to the Ungava region of Quebec. It should definitely be part of the empty quarter along with the other northern, Native speaking areas.

    Strangemaps, have you seen the biomapping site? (www.biomapping.net and http://www.emotionmap.net) Love your blog.

    Comment by Jen — September 12, 2007 @

  6. With the low resolution of the image, I originally saw “Ecotopia” as “Egotopia”. Not entirely unreasonable.

    Comment by Rubrick — September 12, 2007 @

  7. Garreau’s idiocy is staggering. His so-called “Empty Quarter” is home to 14.5 million people, working in a wide array of industries. No, it’s not exactly the Eastern Seaboard in population terms, but it’s not exactly the old-fashioned everybody-on-horses and waiting-for-the-noon-stagecoach frontier that he seems to imagine. Not that way now, wasn’t even that way back in 1981.

    He babbles about the “mind-scarring” distances of 300, 400 or 500 miles between towns; this really speaks more to the smallness of his East Coast mind than to the vastness of the “Empty Quarter.”

    Comment by Doola! — September 12, 2007 @

  8. [...] Read it. I have this book, and I highly recommend it. [...]

    Pingback by DYSPEPSIA GENERATION » Blog Archive » The Nine Nations of North America — September 12, 2007 @

  9. Doola - not only that, but “The Empty Quarter” is home to the interior of British Columbia and the whole of Alberta, two of North America’s most resource-rich areas.

    Also… Detroit as the capital of the Foundry? New York City? Toronto? Why not them, or any of many other cities? Detroit makes no sense to me, even less so in 1981 when it was in even more of a slump than it is today.

    Comment by Dave — September 12, 2007 @

  10. To comprise all of Mexico in a single ‘region’ is absurd. There are wide cultural and economical differences between the mexican states.

    To comply with the idea of broad-range similarities in each region, I would postulate at least two regions for Mexico. ‘Mexamerica’ would be shortened to occupy only the northern, mostly arid states, which economy and cultural identity links them more with the United States.

    The other region would correspond roughly to the ancient Mesoamerica: humid, more fertile states, with a greater cultural bound to its precolombine heritage. The northern border of this region would be those of the states of Nayarit, Jalisco, Aguascalientes, Guanajuato, Queretaro, Hidalgo and Veracruz. This region might even go as far as Nicaragua (but I wouldn’t attempt to assure it).

    Comment by sgenius — September 12, 2007 @

  11. Ecotopia pretty clearly takes its name from the eponymous 1975 novel by Ernest Callenbach, wherein Oregon, Washington, and northern California secede from the Union to form the state of Ecotopia.

    (P.S. People bitching about where the lines are drawn seem to be missing the point that they intentionally gross generalizations. Sheesh.)

    Comment by dnf — September 12, 2007 @

  12. Doola - I believe that Garreau termed the Empty Quarter that because it is a sparsely-populated region relative to the rest of the world - not just the East Coast alone. Given its area, 14.5 million people is a rather small population. Compare that to much of Europe, Asia, Africa - only an American could have the luxury of taking such distances as granted.

    Dave - Garreau expressly and repeatedly emphasized in his book that the Empty Quarter is rich in resources. In fact, IIRC, one of his reasons for naming the region the Empty Quarter is an allusion to the fact that the Rub al-Khali is one of the most oil-rich regions of the world.
    Also, I believe that Detroit is chosen as the capital of the Foundry to emphasize the fact that much of the Foundry was (and still is) in steep decline as its primary industries diminish in importance.

    Comment by Nyx — September 12, 2007 @

  13. |I’d caution against lumping all of the present-day Province of Quebec into the new region of Quebec. There are some significant parts, such as the area southeast of Montreal, that are historically Anglophone, and are populated today by the descendants of Loyalists who fled during the Revolution.”

    There are some areas like that

    http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/events/anglos.htm

    but now 80% of Québec’s Anglophones live in the Montreal area. Outlying areas–like southeastern Québec–have become increasingly Francophone over time, with old Loyalist-settled regions like the Eastern Townships being ~95% Francophone.

    “A number of the fishing outposts on the north shore of the St. Lawrence south of Labrador are English, as well.”

    The Lower Shore and west Montréal island are the only sizable Anglophone-majority territories, while Nunavik–the region of Ungava–is something like 80% Inuit by population.

    Comment by Randy McDonald — September 12, 2007 @

  14. Re: “The Foundry”

    I think that many residents of New York City would be very surprised to learn that they lived in the Rust Belt. Wall Street must be part of the “former industrial heartland”.

    However, I think this probably pales in comparison to the surprise that the citizens of Louisville and Thunder Bay would feel at discovering that they are culturally homogeneous with the peoples of Newark and the Eastern Shore. And would New Yorkers really feel that they had more in common with Indiana than Connecticut?

    The idea of the “Empty Quarter” really pegs this as a masterpiece of provincial cultural buffoonery, however. Imagine my astonishment to learn that Garreau is a journalist living in DC.

    Comment by Sartorius — September 12, 2007 @

  15. Yay!

    Comment by Brock Landers — September 12, 2007 @

  16. I understand that Detroit was selected as the capital of The Foundry to symbolize the decline of the industrial importance of the region.

    However…

    The economic shocks in Detroit are unique in the US and much more profound than in other regions. It’s picking an extreme that hardly represents the norm. Out of the cities in the region, I’d say only Pittsburgh and perhaps Baltimore experienced the same economic shocks. The other major cities (Cleveland, Indianapolis, Philadephia, and especially New York) have not been in similar situations.

    And this is speaking as a former Detroit resident.

    Comment by El Santo — September 12, 2007 @

  17. In the mid 90s there was a map published (I saw it in a newspaper) that divided North America into a number of countries, but far more than just 9. Does anyone recall this map?

    Comment by rek — September 12, 2007 @

  18. Sartorius:

    Garreau actually names NYC, Hawaii and DC (I think) as “anomalies” that don’t fit his scheme. They are what the are and don’t resemble whatever “nation” they happen to be adjacent to. The Manhattanite, yes, has little in common with someone living in say Dayton, Ohio, but someone living in Newburgh or Poukghkeepsie would to a greater degree.

    Comment by the stapler — September 12, 2007 @

  19. I’d separate Nunavut from the “Empty” Quarter.

    Comment by Anonymoose — September 12, 2007 @

  20. @ cephyn:
    Of course. Instead of ‘North America’ I should have put ‘Canada and the US’.

    @ Jen:
    No I hadn’t. Thanks!

    Comment by strangemaps — September 12, 2007 @

  21. “northern half of the American continent” is a bit puzzling. Isn’t North America (with Central America) one continent and South America another, hence “The Americas” (plural)?
    Also, since 2001 the official name of Canada’s tenth province has been Newfoundland and Labrador, so “Newfoundland (including Labrador)” is out of date as well as confusing (Newfoundland the island versus Newfoundland the old name of the province).

    Comment by newfie — September 12, 2007 @

  22. [...] Strange Maps gives us: the Nine Nations of North America. [...]

    Pingback by The Boar’s Head Tavern » — September 12, 2007 @

  23. On the purely formal side, just wondering, shouldn’t bio-regions have boundaries that are ‘natural’ rather than political? Isn’t it a bit of an inconsistency to demarcate a bio-region, e.g., the Breadbasket, with a state line? I think that this map is, conceptually, not a bio-regional map, but a mix of political, economic, and ecological regions.

    I’m not up on the ‘theory’ of bio-regionalism, so maybe I’m being too picky.

    Comment by Gary Ostroff — September 12, 2007 @

  24. Cultural idiocy on display, pure and simple.

    Comment by mikeelliott1 — September 12, 2007 @

  25. These are just lines on a blank map, with no real regard to the geography, or watersheds, or the cultures of the regions. You’d think a ‘bioregional’ map would be based on watersheds and geographic features.

    Comment by rek — September 12, 2007 @

  26. Well, since others are being picky… Quebec is institutionally non anglophone, but New Brunswick is officially bilingual

    Comment by Jen — September 12, 2007 @

  27. That’s very interesting. I’m British but live in Chicago - and have travelled around northern America… The cultural differences, the difference in attitude around the USA are enormous. This is a very interesting graphical representation of it. Thanks for posting.

    Comment by Tim Wheatley — September 12, 2007 @

  28. I’ve read this book… quite a while ago! I recognized the cover immediately, but as to when I read it, I think it was in a college course I took a good twenty years ago. So of course, there may be some things that are now inaccurate that were not when it was published.

    I’ve lived in a good chunk of it since I took that college course though LOL

    Comment by Stef — September 12, 2007 @

  29. “I’d separate Nunavut from the ‘Empty’ Quarter.”

    It’s a nice gesture to Nunavut’s unique culture, but it undermines any pretense to practicality for one region to have a population three orders of magnitude smaller than any other.

    Comment by Brittain33 — September 12, 2007 @

  30. I think this probably pales in comparison to the surprise that the citizens of Louisville and Thunder Bay would feel at discovering that they are culturally homogeneous with the peoples of Newark and the Eastern Shore.

    The map puts Louisville in Dixie, along with southern Indiana, and Thunder Bay in the Breadbasket. Although the latter probably belongs in the Empty Quarter.

    Comment by Brittain33 — September 12, 2007 @

  31. Joel, thanks

    Comment by michael — September 12, 2007 @

  32. Ecotopia? Not these days. It’s nothing but bits and pieces of “what’s left” if it.

    Comment by Cynthia — September 12, 2007 @

  33. Louisville in Dixie? It was my understanding that Kentucky was NOT a secessionist state. Rather an unelected group (probably ignorant slaveowners) proclaimed secession in November, 1861. But it was never official. I prefer to think of us more in the Breadbasket than anything, but certainly not a part of Dixie.

    Signed, a proud Kentuckian.

    Comment by guinness74 — September 12, 2007 @

  34. Can anyone tell what what the little ’symbol’ next to New England is? It looks kind of like a pagoda if I had to guess, but that clearly makes no sense. Is it lobster trap?

    Comment by Vic — September 12, 2007 @

  35. Interesting map. If anything it shows that cultural, economic and political bonds cross borders…like #163: http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2007/08/05/163-europe-wipes-britain-off-the-map/

    Comment by adam p adam — September 12, 2007 @

  36. @ guiness74

    Looks like a pot bellied stove to me.

    Comment by muskiejim — September 13, 2007 @

  37. Reminds me of the nations in that alternate history game Crimson Skies:

    http://crimsonskiesuniverse.com/universe/nations/

    Unfortunately, there’s no map but the flags are lovely.

    Comment by AltHistoryBuff — September 13, 2007 @

  38. An interesting and enjoyable read. Unfortunately, I no longer own the book; in fact, I don’t remember if there was a map outside of the one on the cover.

    Comment by jstater — September 13, 2007 @

  39. The Empty Quarter is empty compared with the other regions. It should probably exclude southern Alberta though. BTW, there is no oil in the Rub-al-Khali; the oil fields are on the Persian Gulf coast.

    As to Louisville in Dixie: it’s been said that Kentucky joined the Confederacy _after_ the Civil War. That is, Kentucky identified with the sentimental idea of “the South” after the secession and slavery issues were dead. There’s a lot more nostalgia in Kentucky for Morgan’s Raiders and the Orphan Brigade than for the much more numerous Union troops from Kentucky.

    Also, Kentucky, like the deeper South, was essentially untouched by the great immigration wave of 1850-1930. In 1910, Kentucky had only 40,162 foreign-born residents. The five states of the “Northwest Territory” had over 3 million. Outside of Louisville and Covington, Kentucky had no counties where even 10% were foreign-born or had foreign-born parents, whereas almost everywhere outside “Dixie”, 10% was the minimum and 50% and 75% were not unusual.

    One should remember that the “South” was not united in secession: east Tennessee and other mountain areas were devoutly Unionist, but still surely “Southern”.

    Comment by Rich Rostrom — September 13, 2007 @

  40. An update to Garreau’s “Nine Nations”, with an explicitly political orientation, can be found at:

    http://www.massinc.org/index.php?id=110&pub_id=1616

    Including only the US, the map there includes 10 “nations”, but they’re interestly similar (and different) from Garreau’s.

    Comment by JO'N — September 13, 2007 @

  41. JO’N, that map was already posted here last November - it’s map #28.

    But nice thinking.

    Comment by Darrel Jones — September 14, 2007 @

  42. The book is from 1984, I believe, and so is somewhat dated. It is a simply marvelous book, and the criticisms here are all dealt with more than adequately in the text. As has been noted, Garreau recognizes exceptions within each region and gives each some attention. People are shooting from the hip in their criticisms, and guessing wrong.

    The NE symbol is indeed a wood stove, more appropriate at the time than it would be now. Garreau’s other books, Edge City and Radical Evolution are also excellent. He won me over when he noted that SW Connecticut is not part of New England. This is known to the rest of NE, and we appreciate someone noting that Hartford and New Haven root for the Yankees.

    Comment by Asst Village Idiot — September 17, 2007 @

  43. [...] el az USA-t, Kanadát és Mexikót: az Észak-Amerikai kontinenst valójában kilenc nemzet népesíti be Joel Gearreau 1981-es ekoregionalista elképzelése szerint, amely a gazdasági, kulturális és [...]

    Pingback by Amerika kilenc nemzete - miafene.hu — September 20, 2007 @

  44. Sort of similar to this map:

    http://www.triptronix.net/ishbadiddle/images/map_with_labels2.jpeg

    More on it here:

    http://www.massinc.org/index.php?id=110&pub_id=1616

    Comment by MEL — September 24, 2007 @

  45. Detroit? I can guarantee that New Jersey would flip the bird at the other nine nations and then nuke itself.

    Comment by Matt — September 24, 2007 @

  46. Nice work. Though I think parts of northern Alberta should get their own designation. What with the second largest deposit of oil being there and all.

    Comment by Sixandtwo — September 24, 2007 @

  47. Happy to see Indiana where it belongs.

    Also, capital of Ecotopia (my native land)should be Portland, Oregon, not San Francisco.

    Comment by Wendy — September 26, 2007 @

  48. [...] 174 - The Nine Nations of North America ? strange mapsMap of South America - The map showing boundaries of the countries in South America Continent. Some major countries located in South America are Brazil, … [...]

    Pingback by | mapsamericas.info — September 27, 2007 @

  49. [...] 174 - The Nine Nations of North America ? strange mapsIn the mid 90s there was a map published (I saw it in a newspaper) that divided North America into a number of countries, but far more than just 9. … [...]

    Pingback by | mapsamericas.info — September 28, 2007 @

  50. Nice post. I read the book long long ago, a couple times, and also followed bioregional discussions in CoEvolution Quarterly / Whole Earth Review. All good food for thought, but unlikely to result in any redrawn boundaries.

    SGENIUS: When I saw this post I had a similar thought, as Mexico and Mexamerica certainly aren’t homogeneous or even coherent. Chiapas state was once part of Guatemala politically, and still is, culturally. The Yucatan peninsula (Yucatan, Campeche y Quintana Roo states) was pretty autonomous for the last half of the 1800s. Mexico seems to be held together primarily by military and petroleum monopolies.

    A georegional map of the northern portion of the Americas might include Garreau’s 9 nations, with Mexamerica ending about where you suggest, near the Tropic of Cancer; Azteca, south from there to Tehuantepec; Baja Mayaland (the Yucatan) and Alta Mayaland (greater Guatemala); and El Puente (the bridge: Honduras through Panama). That’s a baker’s dozen of nations.

    The Maya regions, high and low, could be combined into one impoverished entity. Belize and the Mosquito Coast (probably including Atlantic Panama and the Canal) belong with The Islands. Vast desolate stretches of Chihuahua, Sonora, Durango and Coahuila states might be deeded to the Empty Quarter.

    Redrawing borders is almost as much fun as being an absolute dictator, eh?

    Comment by Ric0 — September 30, 2007 @

  51. [...] 174 - The Nine Nations of North America ? strange mapsLanguages of the Americas. Click the link under a thumbnail to load the corresponding map. These maps may be used in reports, presentations, displays, … [...]

    Pingback by | mapsamericas.info — October 7, 2007 @

  52. [...] 174 - The Nine Nations of North America ? strange mapsMap Centre. Click on a region to show the list of countries and emergencies. World Map. Africa | Americas | Asia | Europe | Oceania … [...]

    Pingback by | mapsamericas.info — October 11, 2007 @

  53. [...] 174 - The Nine Nations of North America ? strange mapsBrowse Atlases and Maps of South America. … Maps of the Americas : Perry-Castaneda Library Map Collection. The Maps of the Americas section of the … [...]

    Pingback by | mapsamericas.info — October 13, 2007 @

  54. [...] 174 - The Nine Nations of North America ? strange mapsOutline Maps North America. North America with Country Borders … Coloured base and political maps of North and South America. South America. South America … [...]

    Pingback by | mapsamericas.info — October 14, 2007 @

  55. As someone living in the greater Indianapolis area, it seems about right to have us right at the confluence of the Foundry, the Breadbasket, and Dixie. There will be those who say that Dixie extends too far north, but believe me, we definitely have some cultural aspects in common with regions more commonly identified as the South.

    Comment by Qoheleth — October 16, 2007 @

  56. A similar idea by Robert David Sullivan is mentioned here:

    http://massinc.typepad.com/beyondredandblue/2007/09/beyond-red-blue.html

    which is based on an article here:

    http://www.massinc.org/index.php?id=110&pub_id=1616

    showing “The 10 Regions of US Politics”

    Comment by Jeff — October 18, 2007 @

  57. [...] 174 - The Nine Nations of North America ? strange maps174 - The Nine Nations of North America ? strange mapsBrowse Atlases and Maps of South America. ? Maps of the Americas : Perry-Castaneda Library Map … [...]

    Pingback by | mapsamericas.info — October 18, 2007 @

  58. [...] 174 - The Nine Nations of North America ? strange mapsMeasuring just a few hundred nanometres across, the impressive creation is made of meticulously folded strands of DNA. [...]

    Pingback by | mapsamericas.info — October 25, 2007 @

  59. he does define “abberations” , such as NYC and DC. also, detroit was named the capital of the foundry because it sympolizes the decline of that nation - which continues today. Finally, the empty quarter is aptly named. 14.5 million people in that size of an area is sparse: there are over 9 million souls in LA county alone.

    overall, the book is spot on.

    Comment by steve — November 15, 2007 @

  60. Re:Dixie and Louisiana

    Southest and most of southwest Louisiana is not really similar culturally to Dixie. Anything north of Alexandria and west of Lake Charles is really more like Mississippi, Arkansas, or Texas than Cajun/Creole areas of the state.

    It’s a shame they’ve successfully stamped out my cultural heritage and turned it into safe-to-consume tourism. It’s pretty terrible being just like the rest of the country.

    Comment by Andrew — February 15, 2008 @

  61. learn french in quebec

    During the Modern era, France has hosted the Olympic Games fives times: two Summer Games (1900 and 1924, both in Paris) and three

    Trackback by learn french in quebec — February 23, 2008 @

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.