Strange Maps

December 4, 2007

214 – The Blonde Map of Europe

Filed under: Uncategorized — strangemaps @ 3:48 pm

blond_hair_map1.jpg 

Q: How do you get a blonde out of a tree?
A: Wave

According to this map – and if you really believe that blondes have less brains –a nasty fall like that is more likely to happen in the central parts of Norway, Sweden and Finland, where at least 80% of the population is fair-haired, the highest figure in all of Europe.

This map, indicating the varying degrees of ‘blondness’ in Europe, shows how fair hair gets rarer further away from this core area – towards the south, as one intuitively might presume, but also towards the east, west and even towards the north.

The consecutive bands (coloured in such a way as to approximately represent the ‘average’ hair colour in each area) surrounding the core blonde area in Scandinavia in most cases don’t correspond with national boundaries, but could be taken to represent certain degrees of ethnic variation, often with a possible historical explanation.

  • The highest percentages of fair-haired people can be found around the Baltic Sea (e.g. Denmark, the Polish coast and the Baltic states), making it in effect an almost entirely blonde-bounded lake. Only the German part of the Baltic coastline is remarkably un-blonde.
  • Iceland was settled by mainly Norwegian colonists, and Icelanders still share the same degree of blondness with the largest part of Norway.
  • The southern border of the fairer-haired part of Great Britain seems to correspond quite well with the southern border of the Danelaw, which was ruled and settled by the Danish in the early Middle Ages.
  • The northern border of the 50-79% blonde area in Britain excludes the Highlands, perhaps indicating this was a refuge for the darker-haired Celtic people of Scotland.
  • The darkest-haired part of France seems to correspond with those areas most heavily populated by its more ancient Gallo-Roman inhabitants, lighter-haired regions possibly reflect a later influx of Celts (in Brittany) and a more pronounced settlement of Frankish tribes of Germanic origin (in northern France and down towards Burgundy).
  • Galicia prides itself on its Celtic heritage. Maybe this explains the relative blondness of that nort-west corner of Spain.
  • The darker-haired area of Switzerland seems to correspond with the areas where Rhaeto-Roman and Italian are spoken.
  • The blonder area in northern Italy might reflect a larger Germanic, Celtic and/or Slavic component of the local population, a similar area in the heel of Italy, way down south, is more of a mystery.
  • A significant blonder-darker divide cuts through the Balkans, dividing Serbia in two (whilst Montenegro lands on the ‘blonder’ side of the border, and Kosovo on the ‘darker’ side).
  • Romanian areas closest to the Hungarian border are equally blonde – many ethnic Hungarians live in Romania, possibly most of them closest to the border.
  • Moldova, ethnically Romanian, is equally dark-haired.
  • As is an adjacent part of the Ukraine, which for the largest part is as blonde as most of central and eastern Europe (all the way down to Georgia).
  • The darker areas in Russia’s far north (the Kola peninsula) and further east (Siberia) are probably due to the prevalence of native, darker-haired peoples, e.g. the Saami (formerly referred to as the Lapps), who also account for the darker area at the very north of the Scandinavian peninsula.

I’ve no idea which year this map is from, but I suppose the larger mobility of people nowadays would make for a more diffuse distribution of hair colouration. Which dovetails nicely with this blonde joke:

Q: What did the blonde do when she heard that 90% of accidents occur around the home?
A: She moved.

The map was sent to me by Faluvégi Balázs from Hungary, and can be found here on eupedia.com, together with other interesting maps showing the distribution of eye-colour, religion, ethnicity, GDP per capita, legal age to purchase and drink alcohol and even the legal status of cannabis.


434 Comments »

  1. Intriguing snapshot. Just curious, but how much would this map change over time? Is the trend in some areas of Europe moving towards darker, or lighter hair.

    Comment by microserf — December 4, 2007 @ 4:41 pm

  2. I notice you forgot North Portugal… Galicia is Spain, right; Minho is North Portugal: two different countries.

    Comment by Lalage — December 4, 2007 @ 4:49 pm

  3. The italian boot is probably explained by the Italo-Normans, which replaced the Greeks there, or possibly the Lombards, a German people who were in turn replaced by the Italo-Normans.

    Comment by Jor — December 4, 2007 @ 5:06 pm

  4. It’s interesting they can draw a continuous line across the northern coast of Poland when the population there largely moved from the rest of Poland following WWII.

    Comment by Brittain33 — December 4, 2007 @ 5:21 pm

  5. On a related theme, skin color, I saw a map some years ago at a conference that showed the likely distribution of skin tones if the only driving factor were solar radiation. Of course, it varies with distance from the equator, but when you plot that onto the land masses of the world, you see what an anomalous place northern Europe is!

    Comment by lichanos — December 4, 2007 @ 5:24 pm

  6. Normans conquered both England and Southern Italy in the 11th Century. Perhaps they are the reason for the blonde streak in the heel of the latter.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_conquest_of_southern_Italy

    Comment by Leo Petr — December 4, 2007 @ 5:28 pm

  7. [...] 214 – The Blonde Map of Europe [...]

    Pingback by | anthro.pophago.us — December 4, 2007 @ 5:32 pm

  8. There are also a lot of ethnic Albanians in that part of Italy, IIRC.

    Comment by hober — December 4, 2007 @ 5:41 pm

  9. The map looks like a complete invention … half the Caucasus is in the “20-49% blonde”, and all the Aegean archipelago too. Most of the “maps” at eupedia.com are far from exact, and some even contradict other maps on the same page.

    Comment by Emil — December 4, 2007 @ 6:00 pm

  10. It is interesting that the genetic stamp of conquest, ie rape and pillage, can be traced this way. The same can be said of any portion of the world of course including the route of Alexander the Great.

    Comment by Brian — December 4, 2007 @ 6:05 pm

  11. [...] Posted in Daily life tagged anthropology at 11:02 am by LeisureGuy Via Strange Maps: [...]

    Pingback by Blond(e) map of Europe « Later On — December 4, 2007 @ 7:02 pm

  12. Nice, but Comic Sans? Ouch.

    Comment by Rik Hemsley — December 4, 2007 @ 7:28 pm

  13. you should find a same kind of map but for redheads!!!

    Comment by Leonardo — December 4, 2007 @ 8:44 pm

  14. 214 – The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps

    No suprises really, still interesting.

    Trackback by kwoff.com — December 4, 2007 @ 9:43 pm

  15. Intresting but last time i went to europ it was last year France and i did not pay attention on a%of collor of the hair.
    http://www.kszysiek.wordpress.com

    Comment by kszysiek — December 4, 2007 @ 10:04 pm

  16. My sisters and I (five of us – all blondes) are 100% Dutch. We know a lot of blondes of Dutch heritage.

    Comment by Erica — December 4, 2007 @ 10:04 pm

  17. Very interesting. As a redhead, I would like to see a similar study.

    Comment by jenniferlynalexander — December 4, 2007 @ 10:08 pm

  18. I do not think it is possible to build a meaningful map about hair color. It is all in the eye of the beholder. When I lived in Central America, anyone with “not-black” hair would be called a blonde. When I visited North Dakota, though, they would laugh at me when I tried to explain that my hair was not actually black; there is much blacker hair, but the nuance did not make sense to them.

    This map seems to be derived from some historical myths and prejudices from the author. How would you get enough data about something like hair color? Especially in the age of dyes. I can assure you that, as far as Spain is concerned, I do not think that the people in Galicia are too different in blondness to their neighbors.

    Comment by lbrice — December 4, 2007 @ 10:25 pm

  19. This map is not entirely accurate. I traveled across most Europe, and found that in Romania, for example, people living in Moldova (on the Romanian side) were also light haired, especially those close to the border and in villages. In Finland, I don’t recall seeing too many dark haired people most were very light haired, not only in the area shown in the map. Same goes for the Baltic countries.

    Comment by Indelible Bonobo — December 4, 2007 @ 10:35 pm

  20. The blond part of the southern Italy is actually no mistery – those people are descendants of Normanic tribes that invaded that part after the fall of the Roman Empire.

    Comment by Baxinho0312 — December 4, 2007 @ 10:40 pm

  21. curioso mapa sobre el porcentaje de rubios en europa

    curiosamente donde mas rubios hay en España es en galicia sera por su sangre celta

    Trackback by meneame.net — December 4, 2007 @ 10:55 pm

  22. So, there aren’t many albinos in Albania?

    Comment by Cappy — December 5, 2007 @ 12:29 am

  23. [...] The blond map of Europe. I’ll be using this to plan vacations for the forseeable future. [...]

    Pingback by Tuesday, 12/4/07 at — December 5, 2007 @ 12:36 am

  24. The explanation on Iceland is only partly true. We’d probably have an even greater percentage of “blondes” if the indeed Norwegian settlers hadn’t mostly been males who many took wives as well as slaves in the British Isles on their way here, in turn mixing the gene-pool a lot towards the same as is today found in Ireland (and Scotland, Shetland etc.)

    Comment by Spatula_S — December 5, 2007 @ 1:29 am

  25. Very interesting post. Thanks for sharing! :)

    Comment by aiwish472 — December 5, 2007 @ 1:46 am

  26. [...] From Strange Maps [...]

    Pingback by Dude, where’s the blondes? « Absolute Moral Authority — December 5, 2007 @ 2:11 am

  27. [...] Blonde on Blonde Posted on December 5, 2007 by Pradeep The blonde map of Europe….Read more [...]

    Pingback by Blonde on Blonde « Funny Emails — December 5, 2007 @ 4:47 am

  28. Fun, but I think whoever came up with this map has way too much time on their hands!

    Comment by roodiedoodie — December 5, 2007 @ 7:44 am

  29. Wow. I love it. What a cool idea for a map.

    Comment by 365characters — December 5, 2007 @ 8:20 am

  30. I think this kind of map didn’t have to be made only for fun; it could have applications in genetic studies.

    After seeing this map, it actually consciously occurred to me that blondes only descend from people from one relatively small corner of the world, while most have dark hair.

    Comment by Jon Q — December 5, 2007 @ 8:28 am

  31. Interesting, but to think that intelligence can be derived from your hair colour is just one of the least intelligent things I’ve heard.

    Regards,

    Comment by Ray — December 5, 2007 @ 8:31 am

  32. [...] curioso mapa visto en StrangeMaps (clic para [...]

    Pingback by ¿Orgullo celta…? | Coriol — December 5, 2007 @ 9:17 am

  33. This map is plain fantasising…

    Take a look at the polish coast and the russian Kaliningrad Oblast, both former parts of Germany* .. were nearly all of the autochtonal germanic population were replaced by Poles(mostly from eastern Poland) or Russians(from all parts) due to the ethnic cleansing happening there at the end of WWII.
    Have the goverments placing the people based on the hair colour?
    You’re blond, you’ve to live in the coastal region…
    Or do blonds prefer living at the coast while brown/black prefer living in the hinterland. That’s stupid!

    On the other side if the data is from the years before WWII, it would also explain the split in Lithuana as the southern part was part of Poland between 1923-45
    ok, not exactly: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Rzeczpospolita_Central_Lithuania.png
    and after all it’s questionable, if 20 years of belonging to another nation are “changing” the peoples colour. Same at the german-danish border…

    So if it should show today’s situation – it’s plain fantisizing .
    If it’s based on data from between the WWI and II aside using modern borders, the data is at least questionable and seems heavily influenced by nationalism at that time.

    And even if unaware of the distressful history of Eastern Europe, one may see that 50-79% blondes in heavily industrialized areas like Northwest England are highly unlikely after 50 years of immigration from all of the world
    (Manchester f.e. has an ethnicity of 81.0% White (acc.Wikipedia) – this means that nearly every white there has to be a blond. Plain stupid!)

    Comment by J. — December 5, 2007 @ 9:22 am

  34. Do the reseachers have the telephone numbers of the blondies they observed?

    Comment by Коллекционер бизнес-идей — December 5, 2007 @ 10:37 am

  35. Interesting map. As noted, there seems some artificialness to the map, I think that it would me much improved if, instead of seeing broad categories of percentage of hair colour, we instead saw something like contour lines. There is a big difference between an area where 49% of the population is blonde and an area where 20 percent of the population is blonde (1 out of 2 vs. 1 out of 5). But the map maker had to make some kind of choice.

    An interesting thing to note is that there don’t seem to be any pockets of ‘high’ blondess, surrounded by ‘low’ blondness, rather the map shows a quickly diminishing core of blondeness. I think its what we’d expect, but still interesting to see.

    As others mentioned, it would be interesting to see the distribution of red-heads here. Are there in between the areas of high blondness and low blondness? Or are there spread out entirely differently?

    Another point of interest is that the ligher areas of italy, as noted, are basically norman derived, and the lighter areas of england are dane derived, so you basically have the same people spreading blondeness to the edges of europe, while the germans (as franks, lombards, etc) spread blondness through the interior of europe.

    Comment by nygdan — December 5, 2007 @ 12:19 pm

  36. [...] multe femei blonde si barbati blonzi pe metru patrat din Europa puteti sa accesati urmatorul site [link]. Pe site gasiti si doua bancuri cu blonde… Q: What did the blonde do when she heard that 90% [...]

    Pingback by Harta blondelor din Europa | www.delfinul.com - delfinul blog - traieste fiecare clipa , destinde-te , afla ceva nou ! — December 5, 2007 @ 1:07 pm

  37. Fantastic topic of discussion..

    Comment by firoze shakir — December 5, 2007 @ 1:36 pm

  38. curioso

    Comment by moncan — December 5, 2007 @ 2:08 pm

  39. I want to see how far the the tail of the map into Russia.

    Comment by Stuart Woodward — December 5, 2007 @ 2:09 pm

  40. In response to 2. Northern Portugal and Galiza belong to different states but linguistically, culturally and ethnically speaking they are the same. It’s the ancient roman province of Gallaecia and the suevian kingdom of Galiza. Probably the blondness comes from the suevians (germanic people) because the Atlantic Celts were mainly dark haired. That includes those of the British Islands.

    Comment by Galego — December 5, 2007 @ 2:24 pm

  41. Blonde hair sometimes occurs together with black skin in Australian Aborigines and nearby Melanesian islanders. It is not attributable to European mixture, instead being some sort of genetic quirk that no one has been able to explain.

    Comment by Peter — December 5, 2007 @ 3:03 pm

  42. One of the most interesting sites on the internet.

    Comment by Thunk Different. — December 5, 2007 @ 3:03 pm

  43. Cool,but a bit pointless.

    Comment by extrapreneur — December 5, 2007 @ 3:13 pm

  44. I just did a project on the stereotypes of blondes in the media. It was ironic that this came up on my home page. It’s interesting though

    Comment by kelleeey07 — December 5, 2007 @ 3:49 pm

  45. Beautiful post! :)

    Comment by Il Secco — December 5, 2007 @ 3:51 pm

  46. The blonder area in northern Italy might reflect a larger Germanic, Celtic and/or Slavic component of the local population

    Wrong.
    They are Veneti.
    From Wikipedia:

    The Veneti were an ancient people who inhabited north-eastern Italy, in an area corresponding to the modern-day region of the Veneto. They spoke Venetic, an independent Indo-European language, which is attested in approximately 300 short inscriptions dating from 6th to 1st centuries BC. Venetic appears to share several similarities with Latin and the Italic languages, but also has some affinities with other IE languages, especially Germanic as well as Celtic.

    Comment by alessandroid — December 5, 2007 @ 3:54 pm

  47. Any chance you could dig up a Redhead Map of Europe? That’d be unique

    Comment by Bieds — December 5, 2007 @ 4:22 pm

  48. You guys really think that western Finland has 80% of the people blonde? :DDDDDD BLONDE MY ASSSS! the number isnt even 40.

    Comment by Jesse — December 5, 2007 @ 4:51 pm

  49. [...] The Blonde Map of Europe [...]

    Pingback by Good to Go Pile . . . « Trading for the Masses — December 5, 2007 @ 4:53 pm

  50. Interesting idea but I think it must be inaccurate. There’s no way that 50-80% of most of the UK is blonde – although I suppose that would depend on your definition of fair hair. And of course if you included in all the bottle-blondes, then Essex should show up more or less white.

    I also second all of those asking for a ginger map of Europe…

    Comment by disgruntled — December 5, 2007 @ 5:20 pm

  51. thats cool. blonde countries. :))

    Comment by I love Idol(s) :) — December 5, 2007 @ 7:15 pm

  52. So few blondes in Switzerland? Really? There goes the film Pane e Cioccolata…

    Comment by cultureonthecheap — December 5, 2007 @ 7:31 pm

  53. About the blonde stereotype: I hope you’re all aware that in the real world blondes would very likely top the chart in an iq-hair colour combo. Btw – Does anyone know when blonde-jokes first became the rage? Non-blonde Norwegian.

    Comment by Norsk Tantra — December 5, 2007 @ 7:44 pm

  54. Thanks for this. I was able to use it in a lesson today when we were discussing the need for melanin in the skin/darker skin versus the need to make vitamin D.

    So, sorry, extrapreneur (43), I and my class of 15 year olds found it had a point.

    Interesting indeed.

    Comment by saturn5 — December 5, 2007 @ 8:35 pm

  55. [...] Diciembre 5, 2007 por jsalinas 214 – The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps [...]

    Pingback by 214 - The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps « Descargas espirituales — December 5, 2007 @ 8:41 pm

  56. [...] Ok… Reinhard Fendrich ist zwar Österreicher… aber die meisten Leute mit blonden Haaren leben dann doch eher in Norwegen, Schweden und Finland. [...]

    Pingback by Schwule, Heten und andere Katastrophen » Blond wie eine Semmel — December 5, 2007 @ 8:44 pm

  57. (40) Indeed, you are right. A map of the germanic toponyms in the Iberian Peninsula (darker indicates more germanic place names):

    http://libro.uca.edu/stanislawski/fig15.jpg

    Map of the arabic toponyms:

    http://libro.uca.edu/stanislawski/fig14.jpg

    This is quite consistent with the Blonde Map and also with the frontiers of the Kingdom of Galiza (and the roman province of Gallaecia).

    Comment by galsatia — December 5, 2007 @ 8:57 pm

  58. nicee. :)

    Comment by backseatlover — December 5, 2007 @ 9:25 pm

  59. brunettes are hotter
    workisboring.wordpress.com

    Comment by workisboring — December 5, 2007 @ 9:39 pm

  60. As to the blondness correlating with dumbness, Iceland has the largest percentage of PHDs in the world, and the Scandinavian countries are consistently in the top 10 best educated countries, unlike the USA which is in the lower middle of the pack.

    Comment by Michael — December 5, 2007 @ 9:40 pm

  61. [...] 214 – The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps: [...]

    Pingback by Dadblog » The Blonde Map of Europe — December 5, 2007 @ 10:31 pm

  62. Is there any Europe map of the age at which men? go bald

    Comment by irishpisky — December 5, 2007 @ 10:37 pm

  63. Why did the blond stare at the can of orange juice?

    It said “concentrate” :)

    Comment by Scavenger — December 5, 2007 @ 10:41 pm

  64. I remember touring Norway back in the early 80’s, and as we got further North, Tromso to be exact, there was a noticeable increase in dark haired people. It really amazed me at the time, but then I conjectured that if you took North to its extreme you’re getting into eskimo country and black hair!

    Comment by kevmoore — December 5, 2007 @ 10:54 pm

  65. [...] under: Europe, Geography — Tags: Blondes, strange maps — omnologos @ 22:58:21 “The Blonde Map of Europe” courtesy of the strange maps [...]

    Pingback by Blondes are Mutants from Sweden and Finland « Maurizio - Omnologos — December 5, 2007 @ 10:58 pm

  66. I’m blonde, and I’m kraut … :-))) …

    Comment by theo48 — December 5, 2007 @ 11:08 pm

  67. [...] Mapa legal! Arquivado em: (insira um título aqui), Offshore thoughts. — Now that you’ve set a preferred language, you can dive right into translating WP.com strings. blog, mapa — odairu @ 9:26 pm Quer saber onde ficam as loiras da Europa? Clica aqui! [...]

    Pingback by Mapa legal! « Café amargo. — December 6, 2007 @ 12:26 am

  68. Thanks for pointing us to eupedia.com. My wife and I love Europe, and we are hoping and praying that we can go back there again.

    Comment by melcartera — December 6, 2007 @ 3:20 am

  69. [...] Posted on Wednesday, December 5, 2007. From Strange Maps: [...]

    Pingback by Mapping the blond « Scavella’s Blogsphere — December 6, 2007 @ 3:46 am

  70. [...] 214 – The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps [...]

    Pingback by 214 - The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps « dont ask | dont tell — December 6, 2007 @ 9:00 am

  71. [...] Blonde map of [...]

    Pingback by the new shelton wet/dry — December 6, 2007 @ 9:38 am

  72. It’s very cool map. You are genius. It’s so funny…

    Comment by belvina — December 6, 2007 @ 9:52 am

  73. very interesting.
    But I was watching something on tv and learned a fun fact about Norway. That most Norway women dye their hair blonde. It’s the style up there, so that blonde map bight not be accurate.

    Comment by nemi21 — December 6, 2007 @ 6:31 pm

  74. [...] Jo, här: [...]

    Pingback by Var återfinns blonda människor? « Nonicoclolasos — December 6, 2007 @ 7:22 pm

  75. I am a natural blond. Ur not. Or maybe u are anyways visit my site!!! Post a comment!!!

    Comment by essmac8 — December 6, 2007 @ 8:48 pm

  76. It seems that this pictures is based on the paper: Frost, P. “European hair and eye color – A case of frequency-dependent sexual selection?” Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2006): 85-103. More information at http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/Frost_06.html

    Comment by Frankie Dintino — December 6, 2007 @ 9:06 pm

  77. [...] are blondes in sweden? Yes, according to Strangemaps we, along with Finland and Norway, is one of the blondest countries in [...]

    Pingback by there are blondes in sweden? « Vintage Swedish Models — December 6, 2007 @ 11:04 pm

  78. Part of Northern Italy is South Tyrol (Suedtirol), an area that until after WWI was Austrian and is still populated mostly by ethnic Austrians. This population is probably the reason that blondness is closer ot Austria’s than the rest of Italy’s (minus the Sourthn blond bit).

    Comment by Kimberly — December 6, 2007 @ 11:20 pm

  79. Fact is that Finland is most blondest country in world because other parts skandinavia in lightest area are really not densely inhabitent and in Finland these areas have dense population.

    Comment by vista81 — December 7, 2007 @ 12:46 am

  80. [...] Baltic Sea Regions Have More Fun 06Dec07 I thought this map of concentration of blondness was [...]

    Pingback by The Baltic Sea Regions Have More Fun « Christopher Colaninno — December 7, 2007 @ 1:57 am

  81. [...] pour trouver une blonde, cherchez sur cette carte. Jeux • Rions un peu • [...]

    Pingback by L’Europe est-elle un pays @ Chacsam — December 7, 2007 @ 4:10 am

  82. [...] Puglia: Biondi Slavoni? Il blog strange maps pubblica la “Mappa dei Biondi d’Europa“: [...]

    Pingback by Puglia: Biondi Slavoni? « Maurizio Morabito — December 7, 2007 @ 12:41 pm

  83. That is wild map.

    Comment by NYBlondes — December 7, 2007 @ 8:07 pm

  84. To everyone using the word “blonde”, can I suggest that you look at the map! It says “light” hair, not blonde, which I would say is not quite the same. I have travelled all over Europe and blonde hair is not common anywhere, not even in Scandinavia. A Swedish friend once told me that only 30% of Swedes are blonde, despite the common stereotype. I think that “light” hair captures everything from platinum blonde through to light brown colour, hence the possibility that 80% or more of Northern Swedes could be included. I could agree that 50-80% of the north of Britain has light hair if you look more at light brown hair in preference to platinum blondes. I would also agree that Germany is not as blonde as the usual stereotype suggests, having been there. The average German I would say again falls into the brown hair category. I thought Poland would have a higher percentage, however, although maybe that is all down to dye?! I wanna see a red hair map too! I dare say that Scotland and Ireland would feature quite highly. I’m sure I saw stats a while ago saying that they were the “gingerest” countries in the World.

    Comment by Pete — December 8, 2007 @ 12:17 am

  85. [...] pour trouver une blonde, cherchez sur cette carte. Jeux • Rions un peu • [...]

    Pingback by C’est l’histoire d’une blonde… à la télévision @ Chacsam — December 8, 2007 @ 1:16 am

  86. [...]   The Blonde Map in Europe [...]

    Pingback by Blonde Frau, Traumfrau! « so cool! — December 8, 2007 @ 11:09 am

  87. [...] 214 – The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps (tags: maps europe blonde visualization demographics biology sociology toread interesting humor design) Related PostsThe best WordPress plugins What I UseTop Ten Countries I would Like to Visit!links for 2007-12-08 [...]

    Pingback by links for 2007-12-09 | Ivoland Personal Diary.. — December 9, 2007 @ 8:23 am

  88. [...] By Map Posted by catholicsensibility under Commentary   The strange maps blog posted the blond/blonde map of Europe last Tuesday. What I found even more interesting were the eupedia maps, first of the majority [...]

    Pingback by Europe By Map « Catholic Sensibility — December 9, 2007 @ 8:58 pm

  89. One thing people need to remember is that lighter hair tends to fade darker as people age. Hence, fair hair is as much a signaler of youth and/or fertility as it is a marker or nordic/germanic blood.

    I’ve watched my brother and sister go from blond through various degrees of darkness to the deep, dark brown my hair was (before my hair started turning grey).

    Comment by Don Hargraves — December 10, 2007 @ 2:50 am

  90. [...] The Blond Map of Europe [...]

    Pingback by Polskaya » Blog Archive » De blondjes van Europa — December 10, 2007 @ 3:44 pm

  91. As a genuine swedish person I can clearly state that 80 % are NOT light haired. We have a HUGE rate of imigration (due to political madness) About 20 % of our population are now of Jugoslavian origin or from the middle east (yes, we take care of more Irakqis than the rest of the western world – 40000 this year and counting).
    Therefor, and because not all swedes are blond, I´d say that about 60% are light haired, and about 30-40 % are true blonds – like me: swedish, tall, blueeyed and healthy!
    In Island, loads are blond. My guess would be 80-95%. In Norway it´s around 60-70% and in Denmark it´s the same.

    Comment by Albert Einstein — December 10, 2007 @ 7:49 pm

  92. [...] I’ve recently added the Strange Maps blog to my daily reads. Want a map of Europe, colored by the percentage of people with blonde hair? It is provided. [...]

    Pingback by Phil Nelson » Blog Archive » Strange Maps — December 10, 2007 @ 10:07 pm

  93. [...] Source [...]

    Pingback by Romanian National Vanguard News Agency » Blog Archive » The Blonde Map of Europe — December 10, 2007 @ 10:30 pm

  94. Just out of speculation: the blonder southern Italian bit in Apulia is (IMNSHO) the result of Slavonian immigration in the X century AD and later.

    Slavonia is the region between Croatia and Serbia and it has the right hair coloration in the map

    Comment by omnologos — December 10, 2007 @ 11:53 pm

  95. But… but… but… what about the distribution of redheads??? Clearly, this is the only question of importance. ;)

    Hmm. Although I wonder if redheads were counted as blondes.

    Comment by Anise — December 11, 2007 @ 1:32 am

  96. who fucking cares, what a waste of research and time

    Comment by betch — December 11, 2007 @ 3:00 am

  97. [...] Post – A great example of how this site is intriguing is the Blonde Map of Europe. It tracks how “Blonde” Europe is by percentage of people who are Blonde. The results [...]

    Pingback by The Jeff Sauer Experience Version 6.0 » My Favorite Web Sites: Part 1 — December 11, 2007 @ 3:34 am

  98. [...] le genre carte à la con, je vous propose celle-là qui vous permet de savoir où on a le plus de blondes en Europe. Et comme par hasard, toutes se [...]

    Pingback by » Mais où sont les blondes ? Le Blog du Blog qui ne l’était plus: Anh Phan : Le Journal du Geek, du Mac, du Gamer et Graphic mais surtout un autre journal — December 11, 2007 @ 7:40 am

  99. [...] une carte utile! Même si nous le savions déjà, la plus forte concentration de blondes est bien dans les [...]

    Pingback by Alexandre’s Blog » Blog Archive » A la recherche des blondes! — December 11, 2007 @ 9:32 am

  100. This was really interesting.
    Thanks for the article :)

    Comment by psychic readings — December 11, 2007 @ 1:13 pm

  101. From what i have seen this map is so wrong. British isles are way more dark haired than nothern germany(over rhine area) and the netherlands. Even Austria and southern germany who arent that blonde as the first mentioned are blonder than britain.
    and i agree baltic area is the blondest , baltic states and central finland. I have been in all those places so i can compare in great britain there is more fake blondes than natural ones, usually continental germanic are taller and blonder than brits (germans,dutch, austrian) that is due large population in britain has native british heritage (of neolithic origin) who are mostly dark haired.
    i would include in lighest area all scandinavia , baltic countries northern germany, low cowntries,northern poland, northwestern Russia.
    and then in a second segment of pigmentations central-southern germany, austria, slovakia , czech republik, northern ukraine central russia central southern poland, Flanders(belgium), belarus where we can find many light types but where darker ones are also present more frequen than the msot light zone where the lighter types predominate by far

    Comment by Devian — December 11, 2007 @ 3:08 pm

  102. [...] Blonde Map of Europe. Had ik al gezegd dat ik pro Europa was? Gevonden via Polskaya, die het bij Strangemaps haalde en oorspronkelijke bron [...]

    Pingback by Blonde map of Europe | Pietel.be — December 11, 2007 @ 3:10 pm

  103. I think in Prague this would be quite true. If we look at the Czech Republic, I thing outside Prague is blonde-ness more common.

    Comment by Elen Prague — December 12, 2007 @ 11:33 am

  104. [...] Blonde kaart van Europa12/5/2007om 08:56 door SteephBlonde kaart van Europa [...]

    Pingback by Blonde kaart van Europa - Sargasso — December 12, 2007 @ 11:55 am

  105. [...] Map: Who has all the blondes? [Strange Maps] (tags: maps demographics europe hair) [...]

    Pingback by links for 2007-12-12 < Travelers Diagram — December 12, 2007 @ 10:18 pm

  106. [...] BBC: The Blonde Map of Europe.  Á þessu korti sést hvar er hlutfallslega mest af ljóshærðu fólki.  Ég hef svo sem [...]

    Pingback by eoe.is » Ferðalög, ljóskur og kossar — December 13, 2007 @ 12:58 pm

  107. Do read Peter Frost’s explanation:

    http://femininebeauty.info/peter.frost.pdf

    Comment by Reinier — December 13, 2007 @ 2:07 pm

  108. HEY…i think that ur not true about one place on the balkan peninsula…MACEDONIA..belive me we are in the middle class…beacouse im sitting right now in an internet cafe
    and i c 10 blond ppl out of 17..its a coincidence but i think that u should study this region a lill better..im blonde as well:):)

    Comment by Teodor — December 13, 2007 @ 2:12 pm

  109. [...] Via strangemaps [...]

    Pingback by Gli uomini preferiscono le bionde… at Stormy Monday Blog — December 13, 2007 @ 11:34 pm

  110. The Blonde Map of Europe

    Check out this ultra important map – the blonde map of europe! This certainly makes geography fun again! Well, I suppose geography wasn’t that fun to begin with, but a blonde map certainly makes it a little bit BRIGHTER.
    So, according to the ma…

    Trackback by Blondelicious — December 14, 2007 @ 3:28 am

  111. As for the blonds in South of Italy, think Roger, brother of William, of the Norman invasions in the 11th Century. Also the Varangians, the Byzantine elite guards. The area was controlled for a century or two by these groups.

    Comment by Onkel Bob — December 14, 2007 @ 4:22 am

  112. I live in the area of 80% blondes, and i’m sorry to say, but it’s quite not true.
    Maybe something like 50%-50% is more near the thruth.

    Comment by ZB — December 14, 2007 @ 9:12 am

  113. [...] From Strange Maps [...]

    Pingback by Paul Mc Namara’s WorldView » Blonde Map of Europe — December 14, 2007 @ 2:34 pm

  114. My mother was 100% Swedish, My father: 100 Norwegian. I am blond; I also spend a lot of money at the beauty salon to keep my hair that golden w/ platinum streaks color….otherwise my hair would be light, but kinda dishwatery!

    Comment by Ruth Olson Reeves — December 14, 2007 @ 3:51 pm

  115. i don’t get it….?

    Comment by Jill — December 14, 2007 @ 10:15 pm

  116. [...] 214 – The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps – “According to this map – and if you really believe that blondes have less brains –a nasty fall like that is more likely to happen in the central parts of Norway, Sweden and Finland, where at least 80% of the population is fair-haired” [...]

    Pingback by … piece 0 plastic - the revolution will be blogged … » Blog Archive — December 15, 2007 @ 5:58 am

  117. [...] invece tinge la chioma di nero per mascherarlo. Ma quanti biondi effettivamente ci sono in Italia? Questa mappa riassume bene la [...]

    Pingback by La mappa dei biondi – Frizzifrizzi.it — December 15, 2007 @ 7:01 am

  118. from an anthropologist/biological possibility on why Northern Europe is more blonde:
    light skin allows more sunlight to be absorbed which in the case of most (not all) light haired people therefore those people who have lighter hair and skin will absorb more vitamin D from the sun which is crucial in places like northern Scandinavia where the sun is fickle.

    Comment by Katrina — December 15, 2007 @ 4:15 pm

  119. I really like this map ^_~

    I´m a russian who lives in western germany. The people in this area are mostly brownhaired but if you go to the north (hamburg, Kiel) there are much more blondes.

    It would be cool, if you´d have shown the russian area ,too.
    <33

    Comment by Mina-Venus — December 16, 2007 @ 1:07 am

  120. Mina that is cause people living over the rhine is often blonder cause germanics in areas over rhine are moer unmixed generally and not mixed with celts and other populations

    Comment by Vader — December 16, 2007 @ 3:48 am

  121. Well the map of the north of england is true, all of the danish and anglo saxons settled in all of these areas and more of less everyone is light haired, 1-100 has very very dark/black hair. Lots of redheads too!

    Comment by northern monkey — December 17, 2007 @ 12:51 am

  122. wow!! greats amazing information.
    here you can get more information about Maps.
    http://www.mapsofworld.com/europe/index.html

    Comment by Map of Europe — December 17, 2007 @ 5:47 am

  123. No way is south-east Italy as blond as depicted on this map. No previous surveys of Italy support this blond element in Apulia.

    Comment by Albert — December 18, 2007 @ 2:32 pm

  124. [...] Blonde Map of Europe / © Strange Maps [...]

    Pingback by Strange Maps: Blonde Map of Europe — December 18, 2007 @ 6:39 pm

  125. [...] preferiscono le bionde è curioso che ci siano mappe che ne indicano la distribuzione sul pianeta. Questa nell’immagine indica la percentuale di donne bionde in [...]

    Pingback by Per gli uomini che preferiscono le bionde: ecco dove trovarle — December 20, 2007 @ 1:10 pm

  126. [...] questa segnalazione apparsa nel blog Stormy Monday, su Pink Blog ed originariamente pubblicata su Strange Maps che riporta la percentuale di bionde in Europa rispetto alle donne con i capelli di altro colore. [...]

    Pingback by La densità delle donne bionde e more in Europa — December 20, 2007 @ 4:30 pm

  127. [...] Но самый шик – это карта блондинок/блондинов Европы: [...]

    Pingback by Странные карты | Блог Алексея Сидоренко — December 20, 2007 @ 7:31 pm

  128. [...] preferiamo le bionde è curioso che ci siano mappe che ne indicano la distribuzione sul pianeta. Questa nell’immagine indica la percentuale di donne bionde in [...]

    Pingback by gege » Blog Archive » Gli uomini preferiscono le bionde — December 22, 2007 @ 7:06 am

  129. [...] в разделе “Странные карты” и [...]

    Pingback by sunshine.by | » Блондинки Европы — December 22, 2007 @ 2:44 pm

  130. [...] via strangemaps  [...]

    Pingback by goderis.com » Blog Archive » blond — December 22, 2007 @ 2:59 pm

  131. Funny, in reality the most blond countries do the best academically(excluding the Pacific rim north Asian countries). In fact, Finland, one of the blondest nations on Earth has ranked #1 in PISA and OECD ratings in education. Even beating the Japanese, Koreans, etc. Also, if one look, those countries with the highest standard of living and quality of life are also the most blonde. The only idiotic blondes I have met were in fact bleached blondes. Cheers.

    Comment by Alex — December 23, 2007 @ 11:26 am

  132. The percentage for the Northern part of Portugal is wrong, 10% will be enough.

    Comment by Francisco — December 26, 2007 @ 11:41 pm

  133. lighest zone is from east to west: northwestern russia , lithuania,latvia,estonia, finland northern poland,sweden, norway,denmark,northern germany, the netherlands and iceland.
    there are also very blond populations in northern ukraine and also in central russia.
    that dont means that in areas like central southern germany and austria, czech republik, slovakia, flanders(in belgium) northern france(above paris)and certain polulations in balkans and also britain blonde(specially northern england and southern scotland) blonde hair is quite common and in general terms fair hair is at least the 50% taking in cound light brown and blonde shades and even red. but in the lighest zone the vas majority of people is blonde …. or at least for people who dont live in those countries the vas majority appear blonde in their eyes since mostly are either blonde or lightbrown …much likely i would say 50% are blondes and 25% are rather light brown shade so just a 25% or even less since we havent counted red heads could be counted as dark haired ones

    Comment by THE MAP IS SO WRONG — December 27, 2007 @ 3:43 am

  134. Make sure you realise that this map is ONLY refering to the NATIVE ethnic population within each region. It is NOT including African, Middle Eastern, Asian etc immigrants. Also i would think that Northern Germany is in fact blonder than it is portrayed on this map because Central and Northern English people decend largely from Anglo-Saxons from North Germany and Denmark.

    Comment by Tom — December 28, 2007 @ 3:13 pm

  135. [...] Blonde map of Europe Varying degrees of ‘blondness‘ in [...]

    Pingback by OTW - December 07 — December 28, 2007 @ 9:09 pm

  136. [...] (an odd favorite for me to check every so often): Strange Maps Filed under: (2) Blogs, Surprise   |   Tags: blonde, europe, map, [...]

    Pingback by Map of Europe’s Blondes « Journey of A Traveler — December 29, 2007 @ 12:01 am

  137. My mother’s ancestors were from Ireland/Scotland- Scots-Irish, and we are as blonde as any Finlander. My father’s ancestors were from Scotland and they are dark haired. A very interesting map.

    Thanks

    Comment by John Sharp — December 29, 2007 @ 3:04 am

  138. The best blonde map is anyway unitedblondes.com

    Comment by Max — December 29, 2007 @ 5:35 am

  139. [...] map of Europe HERE, illustrates how the percentage of blondes in the total population increases as you travel north, [...]

    Pingback by Do Blondes Have More Fun? « Leatherhead Matters — January 1, 2008 @ 9:11 pm

  140. it is sad, but soon there will be no blondes left… as we speak, less than 6 % of the world’s population is blonde. it sure will make those left a real rarity though!

    Comment by haans — January 2, 2008 @ 5:30 pm

  141. This map is as much pure rubbish as several other maps on europedia. The prevalence of blond hair is not nearly that high in Scandinavia, and the myth that Germans are stereotypically blond haired and blue eyes has its origins in racial propaganda, not fact (in fact, you can credit the assimilated Slavonic people of the eastern half of Germany for part of the occurrence; studies show that Germanic tribes were largely dark brown haired/eyed). In fact, Poland has a much higher prevalence of blond/blue. (Czechs, which are their close relatives, have a bit of a lower percentage I would say). Also, in my experience acquired during my trips, the spread of blonds was about uniform (no shortage in Cracow, let’s just say).

    Anyway, the map is quite poor. 30% ranges are quite a wide metric, blond is not defined, and how was the information gathered?

    Comment by Bob the Chef — January 5, 2008 @ 9:15 pm

  142. [...] The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps [...]

    Pingback by mdq » Blog Archive » The Blonde Map of Europe — January 6, 2008 @ 11:24 pm

  143. The Hungarian mass in Romania actually doesn’t live close to the border. And as among these Hungarians -called székelys -there’s a lot of faired haired persons the location of the dividing line in Romania is questionable I guess.

    Map about Transilvanian ethnic setting:

    http://sebok1.adatbank.transindex.ro/terkep/erdely_terkep.jpg

    Comment by Kollegák — January 6, 2008 @ 11:54 pm

  144. [...] strangemaps  Tags: avrupa, harita, sarışın Son [...]

    Pingback by Sarışınlar En Çok Nerde Var -- Kolaj — January 7, 2008 @ 8:28 am

  145. comic sans is for cunts.

    Comment by damian — January 7, 2008 @ 12:48 pm

  146. There was a Normand kingdom in the blondest part of South Italy (the heel of the boot.

    Comment by Adolpho Gordo — January 7, 2008 @ 6:30 pm

  147. [...] The Blonde Map of Europe « strange maps [...]

    Pingback by slash » Blog Archive » The Blonde Map of Europe — January 8, 2008 @ 1:11 am

  148. [...] 1870, a map of the Kaballah Tree of Life depicted in the style of the London Underground, and a Blonde Map of Europe, featuring percentages of light-haired people in [...]

    Pingback by Strange Maps « New Risks’ Weblog — January 8, 2008 @ 4:26 pm

  149. [...] blonds just wanna have fun: http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/214-the-blonde-map-of-europe/ c’est bien meilleur le matin… et le soir?: [...]

    Pingback by Menoum! » Blog Archive » Les trouvailles de ze-nana — January 9, 2008 @ 3:49 pm

  150. [...] Strangemaps habe ich jedoch eine interessante Karte entdeckt welche den Prozentsatz an blondhaarigen Menschen [...]

    Pingback by Magst du Blondinen? — January 9, 2008 @ 7:02 pm

  151. [...] de Strangemaps [...]

    Pingback by El Mapa Rubio de Europa « entertothematrix — January 10, 2008 @ 6:15 pm

  152. For all the complainers, comments #76 and 84 tell what you need to know to understand this map. Admittedly, the title “Blonde Map” obscures the fact that the study was about light, not blond hair.

    Another way of looking at this map is to consider hair lightness as a mutation spreading out from the Baltic coast of Sweden, rather than away from the equator. Frost’s explanation of sex selection (as linked in comment #76) suggests why such a spread might be rapid. Lightness of hair would be a more powerful selector where it was rarer.

    Comment by Assistant Village Idiot — January 10, 2008 @ 9:12 pm

  153. Blondness has nothing to do with geography. Blue eyes and fair hair are a consequence of the genetic mutation which happened long time ago in the baltic region. Such mutations happen everywhere in the world but they normally vanish immediately. For some reason , this genetic mutation in the Baltics kept to proliferate. The most probable cause may be the attraction of females to blue eyed/blond males.

    Since the hair is being much dyed today, you rather post the map of blue eyes.

    Comment by Lucijan — January 12, 2008 @ 1:37 pm

  154. [...] This is so true, found here [...]

    Pingback by FatSox.com » Blog Archive » The Blonde is i — January 16, 2008 @ 7:34 pm

  155. This map is completely inaccurate, obviously! It made me laugh to see that there shall be parts in Britain with more blondes than in Germany and the Netherlands. Ridiculous…

    Comment by gnome — January 19, 2008 @ 10:41 am

  156. This map is completely inaccurate, obviously! It made me laugh to see that there shall be parts in Britain with more blondes than in Germany and the Netherlands. Ridiculous…

    you have notices some noticiable mistake.. britain is much more brown haired nation than netherlands and germany… in germany and netherlands according to my experience predominate blonde hair ..specially dark blonde hair…. being the north of germany(over the rhine) and the netherlands not darker than scandinavia… even austrians and southern germans are blonder in average than brits… brits seem a quite brown haired nation to be considerated germanic.. if u see at the british population they have obvilius native briton and mediterranian traits..they are a mixed population..being far to be considerated of “predominant nordic” as the continental germanics. well and estonia is the blonder country of the world …blonder than anywhere in scandinavia…thats my humble opinion.. and observation… also russian populations in karelia are :)

    Comment by Radekk — January 20, 2008 @ 3:31 am

  157. [...] Där publiceras obskyra kartor över alla möjliga fenomen. Kartan över andelen européer med blond hårfärg har växt många reaktioner (i dagsläget 156 kommentarer!). Som den kartälskare jag är blir [...]

    Pingback by Jonas Mosskin» Blog Archive » Strangemaps om Europas blonda befolkning — January 22, 2008 @ 12:36 pm

  158. Great map! I think the blondest area in south-estern Italy is less of a mystery if one remembers that it used to be the center of the Norman Kingdom between the X and XIII century A.D.

    Comment by Luka — January 23, 2008 @ 1:42 pm

  159. So viele Blonde in Galizien wie in Deutschland? Nicht wahr, überhaupt nicht!!

    Comment by Pauline — January 25, 2008 @ 7:30 pm

  160. Interesting but incomplete. Where are the Canary, Madeira and Azores Islands?

    Comment by Ricardo — January 25, 2008 @ 10:40 pm

  161. [...] In looking for more details about this graphic I came across an article about it on the Strange Maps blog, and I was hooked immediately. Recent entries contain gems such as Papua New Guinea as linguistic superpower, a caricature of Europe in 1870, and a Blonde map of Europe. [...]

    Pingback by Strange Maps - Another fascinating website « Sunny spells and scattered showers — February 1, 2008 @ 1:58 am

  162. [...] these quirky cartographers. My personal favorite include the night-time illumination map of Korea, the blonde map of Europe and a maximally fragmented North [...]

    Pingback by The Quixotic Engineer — February 3, 2008 @ 8:56 pm

  163. [...] Nifty(”div#wrapper”, “tl tr normal”); 0+shareThe blonde map of europeThe highest percentages of fair-haired people can be found around the Baltic Sea (e.g. Denmark, the [...]

    Pingback by UriShare - The blonde map of europe — February 5, 2008 @ 11:13 am

  164. [...] neuen knight rider-film (läuft wohl bals im US-Fernsehen) oder etwas über kuriose karten (e.g. The Blonde Map of Europe). nicht mal die unglaublich wahren Briefe der Therese Manko regen mich heute zum schreiben an. [...]

    Pingback by neues aus der roiberhöhle » Blog Archive » Er kommt - pixelroiber - Ein Blog, ein Computer, ein Mann. (Pause) pixelroiber - Ein Mann und sein blog kämpfen gegen das Unrecht. — February 7, 2008 @ 12:06 pm

  165. Very interesting topic.
    Im from Croatia,100% blond and blue eyes. and this precentage of light hair for balkans are pretty correct(except Macedonia, they are also slavs like us).Dividing on balkan is logical.Montenegro are slavs, Kosovars are ilyrs (like albanians, darker).
    It will be interesting to see map of world like this.
    Or map of people height in Europe (I read that we Dalmatians and some part of Belgium/Holand are the tallest in Europe with average 185 cm).

    Comment by Zagor — February 11, 2008 @ 8:33 am

  166. [...] ilustrada como o mapa do metrô de Londres. Quem gosta de pessoas loiras, por exemplo, pode usar esse mapa aí de cima para planejar sua próxima viagem. Fica a [...]

    Pingback by Lápis Raro » Estranhas cartografias. — February 14, 2008 @ 5:31 pm

  167. [...] I originally saw the “The Blonde Map of Europe” here. [...]

    Pingback by The Blue Eye Map of Europe « Western Paradigm — February 27, 2008 @ 6:32 am

  168. How about this site, the Blue Eyed map of Europe:
    ohttp://westernparadigm.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-blue-eye-map-of-europe/f europe.

    Stephen Roney

    Comment by Stephe Roney. — February 29, 2008 @ 8:37 pm

  169. lol did’nt see that the above poster has already given you this information. Sorry.

    Comment by Stephen Roney. — February 29, 2008 @ 8:38 pm

  170. [...] La carte des blondes en Europe [...]

    Pingback by Guilhem Bertholet » Blog Archive » Toutes les cartes en main… — March 1, 2008 @ 6:45 pm

  171. I live in sweden, and im sorry to tell but most of the girls with blonde hair here has coloured it. So there is A LOT of fake blondes here. Im one of them with my bleached blond hair :)

    Comment by Linda — March 7, 2008 @ 3:55 pm

  172. Get your nordic butts down here,lets lighten Spain lol xD

    Comment by Spaniard — March 7, 2008 @ 10:39 pm

  173. I wonder what you would see if you overlayed the blonde map over a map of muslim density… or christian density…

    Comment by oddThought — March 12, 2008 @ 6:58 pm

  174. theres only fake blondes in sweden!! i went to sweden with my friend and almost everyone had fake blonde hair, we got realy disapointed, but the country was beautiful tough :)

    Comment by Armando — March 16, 2008 @ 3:35 pm

  175. I live in Finland and I have seen lots and lots of natural blondes. I am sure that Finland has the biggest amount of blondes in the world. Think for example f1-drivers: All of them are blondes. Almost every child in FInland has blonde hair too.

    Comment by I — March 23, 2008 @ 7:29 pm

  176. And if you want to see a beautiful natural blonde go check Laura Birn

    Comment by I — March 23, 2008 @ 7:30 pm

  177. Ok, this map gives an idea but it’s not totally correct, and i’m talking about the regions I know, i just trust the others : )Southern Italy is surely wrong: yes there are many and many cases of very light blonds, but not as many as 20%.While in northern part the blonder area should be enlarged to the boundaries with Austria and Switzerland, and a little bit more.
    Romanians are also blonder than depicted here, while british and galicians are not.Yes Scandinavia is Blond but doesn’t get to 80%, it’s too much.i’d say 60% or something like that.I don’t know about the rest ’cause it looks right to me.

    Comment by Name_me — March 24, 2008 @ 12:09 pm

  178. In northern Spain(The Basque country) there are a lot of people with light hair but i guess that doesnt count as blonde.

    Comment by Spain — March 24, 2008 @ 6:47 pm

  179. Stumbeled across this. Well, I live in norway, and i for a long time wondered why females are blonder than men here. Well, it seems to have something to do with hormones, females with a high estrogen level, meaning they are healthy, are generally more blonde (if genes allow it). I see that in my family, almost all females are (naturally) blonde, almost all men have dark hair. I had blonde hair as a boy, but as i reached 20 years of age, it had turned dark, as Ive seen with many. There are quite a few blonde men aswell but theyre less common. My guess would be 70% blonde hair for female, 30% blonde hair for men. It cant be that far off because unless haircoloring and lying about it is really common here.

    Im now not counting in the large and increasing propotion of muslim people here.

    Comment by Roar — March 29, 2008 @ 8:54 am

  180. Wow. I am always amazed that Germans are still portrayed as blond and blue eyed.Hitler had a great propaganda machine…years late people still buy into it. My sister (we are German) has constant arguments with visitors to Germany that insist she is Italian or Turkish. My friend constantly has to tell people that she is German…not Spanish. I would say in general we fall somewhere in between!! Brown would best describe it. It is not uncommon in German families to have children from the same parents with very different hair colors and complexions (one blond one black)

    Comment by d.america — March 30, 2008 @ 8:36 pm

  181. This map has many mistakes.The part related to Spain is wrong ,there are many blondes in the south and in madrid too,the basques country too,not only galicia .That is a big lie I dont know who designed this map sowrong.
    I can assure you that if you go top the basques country ,you will find more blondes that in Wseden and all the blondes that you see are natural,not bleach hair.

    A study made in the basques country showed that 40 % are blonde with blue eyes,7% black hait and the rest brown and reddish brown.So it is totally wrong not to include the Basques country.

    Great Britain and Ireland have many many ,lots of people with jet black hair.

    Comment by al — March 31, 2008 @ 12:55 am

  182. I am from the …italian boot..I must confess that maybe the map is not so wrong, because actually I have met a few blondes in my life spent here, though I don’t know other places of Italy very much…
    if I must think of some historical reason for this, what comes to my mind is the rule of Normans…as far as I know, their presence here has been kinda relevant..if I am not wrong,also the famous emperor Fedreric II of Svevia was norman or had norman relatives and he built the famous “Castel del Monte” in Trani…about Lumbards, never heard of Lumbards down here

    Comment by Pierluigi — April 2, 2008 @ 6:18 pm

  183. I am sorry ,but I can do a better map.While there many blondes in Sweden it does not reach that amount.It is too high for this country..Also men in Sweden tend to have dark hair not blond and most of the women bleach their hair to blond.You can see the roots of the dark hair up to their foreheads.I would say that you see more natural blondes in Finland and Norway.
    Great Britain does not have many natural blondes,black hair and dark brown is predominant.There are few natural blondes.

    Northern Spain has lots of natural blondes,Cantabria,Asturias,Galicia,The Basque Country,La Rioja,
    Aragon,Gerona,Madrid in the center,even in areas of the south you see many Spaniards who are natural blond with green or blue eyes.
    France has also many blondes especially along the northern coast and in the mountain villages.

    Comment by al — April 5, 2008 @ 1:55 pm

  184. People in Northern Europe have a different view on the definition of the word “blond” than in Southern Europe. Blond is yellowish, very light hair.

    An example – http://www.esec-alcaides-faria.rcts.pt/Delegacao.htm. The first girl thinks she has brown hair, while it’s easy to see that they’re black as black they could be. The first guy thinks he has blond hair while he clearly has dark brown hair. It’s up to the definition of the word “blond”. I’m sure that in the map people with dark brown hair are listed as people with “light hair”.

    Comment by Latvian — April 9, 2008 @ 8:58 am

  185. germans are more blonde that brits in average , that is easy to see.. in britain you got much more % of people with black or dark brown hair while in germany most of dark haired people got something between medium and light brown hair. There are also far more “natural” blondes in germany than in britain. Ireland is very dark haired in average compared to rest of northern europe. also is wales.

    Comment by VAN DIJK — April 14, 2008 @ 12:40 am

  186. most blonde people live in northen continental europe and scandinavia.

    so you expect the blondest people to live in Nowesternrussia, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Belarus, Northern Poland, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, The Netherlands, Northern germany (over the rhine) the rest is DARKER!

    Comment by VAN DIJK — April 14, 2008 @ 12:45 am

  187. [...] I recently came across this diagram at Strange Maps. The map shows the one place in the world where at least 80% of the population is fair-haired—in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Indicating the varying degrees of ‘blondness’ in Europe, it shows “how fair hair gets rarer further away from this core area—towards the south, as one intuitively might presume, but also towards the east, west and even towards the north. The consecutive bands (coloured in such a way as to approximately represent the ‘average’ hair colour in each area) surrounding the core blonde area in Scandinavia in most cases don’t correspond with national boundaries, but could be taken to represent certain degrees of ethnic variation, often with a possible historical explanation.” For the full scoop, visit here. [...]

    Pingback by Robert L. Peters » Of blonds and blondes… — April 14, 2008 @ 5:20 am

  188. I’m an Englishman with blonde hair and brown eyes, so this subject is close to my heart after some of the comments I’ve had in the past.
    People saying “you must dye your hair”, because I don’t have blue or green eyes, but my combination isn’t that unusual! I lived in Glasgow, Scotland, and people there were always asking me if I was German or Scandinavian! I think there is a variation throughout Britain, where those in the darker areas think Brits have dark hair and those in the fair regions think Brits have quite blonde hair. I am from North East England, where there are lots of blondes, as with much of Northern and Eastern England (the part closest to Scandinavia and historically Anglian and Viking). I went to Sweden once and I didn’t think there was much difference! You see a lot of dyed hair there and I think they like to exaggerate the Swedish stereotype.
    The South and West of England, plus the West of Scotland, is considerably darker than the North and East of England, probably due to the lack of Viking influence and more Celtic influence. I think most visitors to England stay around London and the South, so they don’t see the blonde Northerners. Hence the surprise in the above comments that Britain has a high blonde rating. Also, I think people see what they want to see. If people think all Swedes or Germans are blonde, then they ignore all the dark-haired Swedes and Germans and imagine 100% blondeness! My sister, myself, my Dad, my uncle, my best mate, we all have blonde or fair hair, but if people want to see dark hair in England, then they ignore this fact and ask if we’re from abroad!
    Anyway, I don’t suppose this map is entirely accurate, but there are a lot of opinions and stereotypes around Europe generally about the appearance of different nationalities. Personally, I think a lot of Europeans could be from any country in Europe. There is a bit of a North/South divide, but I’m sure some Norwegians could pass as Italian and the other way round, if their nationality was unknown to the person looking at them. As soon as we see a person from X-country, it’s easy to see the national stereotype. Also, someone made a good point about perception – If you’re from a Mediterranean country, maybe you see dark brown as actually being blonde! But if you were from Finland, you might see light brown as being very dark. That’s that settled, then 8D

    Comment by Pete — April 17, 2008 @ 6:02 pm

  189. actually the map is very nosense
    how would you expect an average dutch and northern german be into the same category as an average bosnian, not accurate at all
    frisians are even more nordic looking than average scandinavian, no doubt about it

    Comment by Zakk — April 18, 2008 @ 4:05 pm

  190. Very funny and intresting

    Comment by Christopher Williams — April 20, 2008 @ 6:29 pm

  191. slot machine gratuit…

    Trackback by roulette portales — April 22, 2008 @ 2:32 pm

  192. [...] source: Strange Maps [...]

    Pingback by Map of Percentage of Blonds in Europe : Raw Number — May 5, 2008 @ 3:53 pm

  193. texas holdem…

    Call free poker poker gratis para pc…

    Trackback by advance cash fax no payday — May 6, 2008 @ 7:59 am

  194. gratis poker spilen…

    Of the record download casino games poker regeln reihenfolge…

    Trackback by texas holdem jeu gratuites — May 6, 2008 @ 10:21 am

  195. I’m Danish but blonds and blondes aren’t very common on my side of the family. My mother in-law’s side of the family is about 80% or more blond/blonde and it’s over 95% blond/blonde on my father in-law’s side but they’re also from a north western side of Jylland where people didn’t move away to find partners until recent decades.

    My mother in-law is from the eastern part of Jylland. My husband is blond, fair/rosy and light blue eyed. Both he and all of his family look very Nordic as a phenotype. I can’t quite pin point it but even those with brown hair have some “viking” appeal over them that I can’t explain. I certainly wouldn’t guess any of them to be from a country outside north western Europe if I didn’t know better.

    My mother is mixed Fynbo and Jyde and I think the side of her family from Fyn which is the middle Island in Denmark is darker haired than the side of her family from north west Jylland.

    I’m adopted from Thailand so I don’t count but my boys are the first with brown eyes in both of my in-law families.

    My mother says there was some French intermarrying to our family which might explain why quite a few of my mother’s family have brown hair and light brown or hazel eyes. The facial and other phenotypical features of my mother’s side of the family are more common in Mediterranean countries than here in Denmark.

    My adoptive dad is American and I don’t think there are any blondes in that family but quite a few of the males are blond. They’re of German/Welsh/Norwegian descent.

    Comment by Joannah — May 15, 2008 @ 11:43 am

  196. this map is not at all scientifical. It lays only on common prejudices. Just

    this is very funny to see all these people believe everything in it… !!!!

    My mother is Finnish and I can tell you there is not 80% of blond people in Finland. My father is French from Normandy and I can assure you that there is much more blond people that in Northern Portugal (where I have been too)…

    I think this map was made by an eccentric person who cannot know Europe…

    Comment by chriss — May 17, 2008 @ 12:23 pm

  197. Thank you for good information~~*

    Please comeback to visit my blog too : http://about-freeonlinepoker.blogspot.com/

    I’m sorry , If you think this is spam. but may i thank you again.

    Bye

    Comment by Mint — May 19, 2008 @ 2:15 pm

  198. My hypothesis is that recessive genes for blond / red hair and blue / green eyes are the result of inter-breeding with Neandertals. If these traits are the result of high latitudes, these traits should express themselves more evenly in all high latitudes, in both hemispheres, and not be so concentrated in Northern Europe. Awaiting better DNA testing of Neandertal remains… Not a geneticist or anthropologists – just a design engineer used to looking for outliers.

    Peter’s comment (#41) of Australian Aborigines and nearby Melanesian islanders is the only exception I’ve ever run across. But perhaps a branch of Neandertals got there first also.

    So do populations with high blond ratios tell brunette jokes? I suspect not.

    Comment by JGsez — May 21, 2008 @ 5:21 pm

  199. [...] http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/214-the-blonde-map-of-europe/ [...]

    Pingback by ¿Son rubios en Galicia? « Blog del español en Pilsen — May 23, 2008 @ 11:46 am

  200. ok this is a serious map..

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Lighteyesmap3.jpg

    Comment by kranzl — May 31, 2008 @ 6:16 pm

  201. the map of Frost is totally wrong..i can make a better map with Paint..lol..

    this map is by Coon an anthropologist with the balls !

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Lighteyesmap3.jpg

    Comment by kranzl — May 31, 2008 @ 6:22 pm

  202. “A study made in the basques country showed that 40 % are blonde with blue eyes,7% black hait and the rest brown and reddish brown.So it is totally wrong not to include the Basques country.”

    ahahahahah 40% of blondes in Spain ??? LOL ! c’mon what have you smoke ?? even in Denmark there isn’t such an high percentage of blondes !

    Comment by kranzl — May 31, 2008 @ 6:29 pm

  203. [...] an almost entirely blonde-bounded lake. Only the German part of the baltic coastline is remarkablyhttp://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/214-the-blonde-map-of-europe/cpmr baltic sea commission&quotRegional Innovation Strategies In the baltic Sea&quot, PPT, speech. [...]

    Pingback by baltic sea — June 3, 2008 @ 6:31 pm

  204. [...] Blonde map of Europe Varying degrees of ‘blondness‘ in [...]

    Pingback by Links for December 07 « markbradshaw.wordpress.com — June 12, 2008 @ 1:00 pm

  205. There isn’t as many blondes in sweden as they claim there is.
    I have met more norwegians that is more blonde than swedish.
    Also what is blonde? there are many varieties. Also people whose hair that gets blonde in the sun? Does that count? If I was compared toa girl with black hair, then I would be considered a blond. but in Denmark, I am not considered a blonde. I am in the middle.
    I root for blue eyes instead.

    Comment by Rikke — June 16, 2008 @ 11:57 am

  206. Nobody seems to have noticed that dumb “blondes” are never actually blonde, they’re all dyed. Most true blondes I’ve ever known have been rather intelligent!

    Comment by Jon — June 16, 2008 @ 9:20 pm

  207. I’m surprised the Netherlands doesn’t have a higher percentage. When I was there it seemed like everyone was blond or light brown-haired. The same seems to be true for Americans of Dutch ancestry.

    Comment by James — June 19, 2008 @ 5:50 am

  208. the map is bad done

    Comment by hans — June 21, 2008 @ 11:36 pm

  209. I am surprised that the blonde map of Europe is not just: Iraq, South Africa and Asia!

    Marina
    Your trusty philologist

    Comment by marina — June 23, 2008 @ 1:05 am

  210. I can make a better map than this.Some people believe all the crap that one person did here.ohh please give me a break.I have photoshop and I can make a better map than this.

    Comment by jhu — June 26, 2008 @ 2:39 am

  211. I just spent 2 weeks in Germany and I did not see all these blondes.I was in Berlin and what I saw there was brown and black hair ,very few blondes and besides that bleached blondes with dark eyebrows and brown eyes.

    Please the nex time desing a map with scientific explanations.I saw most of the time that men in Germany tend to have dark brown hair ,so you can tell by that, that women are not naturally blonde.I saw more natural blondes in Argentina than in Germany ,a South American country.

    Comment by mark — June 26, 2008 @ 2:51 am

  212. I want to know where I can find cute blonds in the U.S. hehe

    Comment by MD — June 29, 2008 @ 3:53 pm

  213. You forgot Southend, capital of the Essex blonde, 100% blonde (or maybe she did tell you but forgot where on the map Southend was).

    Comment by Hillary Shaw — June 29, 2008 @ 4:01 pm

  214. This map is so bad.The person who made this stupid map put more blondes in Iraq ,the middle east that in France,Italy ,portugal ,spain and eastern europe.That is so funny,,,ja ja ja ja .

    Funny beacuse Iraq does not have even a single blonde human being.

    Comment by carl — July 2, 2008 @ 2:40 pm

  215. Indeed, this map, which was made by scientists of the early 20th century, is absolete. Today, the percentage of blondes is unfortunately lower in every country on this map. Well, I try to make a realistic estimation:

    Scandinavia: 40 – 45 %
    Baltic Countries, Iceland: 35 %
    Russia, Belorussia, Denmark: 30%
    Northern Germany, Eastern England, Netherlands, Poland: 25%
    Celtic (British) Countries, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, Czechoslowakia: 20%
    Hungary, Northern France, Lombardy, Slovenia, Croatia, Ukraine, Moldova: 15%
    France, Romania: 10%
    The rest remains below 10%.

    If you want to get a realistic view of the blonde proportion of a region, city or country you must count the proportion of blonde men: Because women tend to bleach their hair. Many “blondes”, especially in southern countries, are definitely fakes.
    The blondes in Padania are partly of germanic (lombardic) derivation, partly from pre-germanic celtic influences, partly of Austrian derivation (Southern Tyrol is ethnically Austrian). Some are descendants of migrants from the north in modern times. Very few have their roots in normannic sailors.
    The blondes of some regions in Spain (like Asturia and Galicia) are mainly of celtic derivation, but also descendants of germanic tribes. The ancient celts were much fairer then the mixed celtic people of today’s so-called “celtic” countries. (However, they were less blond then ancient germanics.)
    You can’t estimate an country after their cities, because cities in northern countries tend to be significantly darker than the rural regions. In the south it is possibly contrary.

    Well, there are some desideratums. The researchs have not provided maps for the:

    1. Percentage of blondes in the United States and in Australia
    2. Percentage of redheads
    3. Percentage of especially long-legged, blue-eyed blondes (indeed, that’s what men need)
    4. Percentage of fake blondes (to get a realistic view of the percentage of the naturals)

    On the impertinent IQ-debate: Blonde yokes are a creation of the resentments of the non-blondes. All maps show a significant increase of morality, intelligence und human development with the increase of blondes. For that reason, earlier scientists believed in the “superiority of the nordic race”. However, I do not believe that darker people are generally less intelligent. That topic is too difficult for conclusive statements. From my point of view, blondes are quite intelligent, but more or less naive. That’s the point, indeed. The conservative asians are laughing about the blonde european benevolence and so-called “liberalism”. Blondes tend to liberal and tolerant politics, you can’t found that type of policy in asian or african countries.

    Comment by Addick — July 4, 2008 @ 7:05 pm

  216. Minho and Galicia are the SAME COUNTRY in different states…Whoever able to think out of the box knows that Galecia/Galiza is the birth of PortuGAL (who was originally the Southern Galician realm later expanded towards mozarabic lands southwards)…But Galiza and Minho are culturally and anthropologically speaking THE SAME THING…

    Comment by Mailoc Dumiense — July 15, 2008 @ 10:18 pm

  217. [...] в разделе “Странные карты” и здесь Конекстная реклама Развитие темы [...]

    Pingback by » Блондинки Европы • Гей-сайт Беларуси | sunshine.by — July 25, 2008 @ 11:01 am

  218. [...] Foto vía: strangemaps [...]

    Pingback by Rubias, de donde vienen y adonde van — July 25, 2008 @ 6:56 pm

  219. ive got nautrally blonde hair and im from the north-east area of england, but i wouldnt say that 50-79% of people in my area have blonde hair lol i think this map is out of date xxx

    Comment by Suzannah — July 27, 2008 @ 9:55 am

  220. Look at this picture. Its a picture of choir from Finland. There are many blondes whit blue eyes.

    http://naistenmatka.pirkkala.fi/naistenmatka8/kuoro0607.jpg

    Comment by Kaisa — July 29, 2008 @ 3:59 am

  221. most british people arent blonde at all just go and check http://www.bebo.com most of those people have celtic features and arent blonde , so we can say british people arent of nordic or northern european origin at all, many could pass for french or even spaniards and italians without any problem

    Comment by Rodderik — July 29, 2008 @ 11:46 pm

  222. Well, that map is “saying” that there are more blondes in the north of portugal than in moldova. I’m from moldova and I live in Portugal and an assure you that is not true. I’ve got a huge family(my mother has lots of brothers) and we’re almost all blondes. In portugal, blonde hair is rare and most of the existent portuguese blonde are not even 70% portuguese.

    Comment by Doina — August 2, 2008 @ 2:50 pm

  223. i agree with you moldova and even southernmost countries of eastern europe have their share of blonde hair, you can find many moldovians who can look baltic or polish, while portuguese, and most iberians, italians and greeks are very dark haired

    Comment by Radd — August 2, 2008 @ 11:37 pm

  224. in northern europe blonde hair is reducing because of the mixture, if they have been very blonde it’s because of teh lack of mixture. I think Spain has an important number of blondes(it’s not rare) in comparison with the world average

    Comment by serlon — August 13, 2008 @ 9:44 am

  225. Everybody knows in Spain that Galicia is a celtic land (Asturias so).In addition, it is not so known that Galicia was the area conquered by the Suebi at 5th Century A.D…..

    Comment by Gadella — August 14, 2008 @ 12:15 pm

  226. very intresting map and i totaly agree ,seem to me ppl have different concept of blonde, spaniars go crazy and dyed their heads … anyway the thing is in genes, long time ago they were eskimoids all over scandinavia and ussr(russia ) , so were the most isolated of all .. FINLAND! they are isolation of genes , u can be dark mongoloid finish but still have the blondest kids im russian with very strange heritage ,my granma is russian kinda eskimo type too , green eyes

    Comment by duren — August 19, 2008 @ 3:34 am

  227. black hair , flat small nose : ] and my granpa was adugey a small isolate minority from caucus , they are the most anciet tribes of europe, and most isolated too . so my mother is redhead with brown eyes,her brother black hair and greenblue eyes, so what about me , from russian blonde father well im damn brunette and dont really look like a russian but i think is good to keep blonde identity and watch how those dirty mixtage between europeans fuck each other to becom more “fair”:]

    Comment by duren — August 19, 2008 @ 4:28 am

  228. dirty european gypsies go back to caves or ur inferiorety will kill us all

    Comment by duren — August 19, 2008 @ 4:37 am

  229. Im an australian with Irish and aboriginal ancestry and me and my brothers all have blonde hair even though all our grandparents have red hair and our my and dad both had brown and black hair, though I still got the dumb red head effects of in-tannability =( I think about going outside and I get sunburned…

    Comment by Sean — August 24, 2008 @ 10:13 pm

  230. Also there are alot of blondes here too like in my street alone about 60% of the houses have at least one natural blonde. There are also blonde and red haired aboriginies in the desert towns too which is wierd coz when I went through the desert in SA I kept seeing these little black kids with blonder hair than mine =S But it makes more sense for people who live in sand to have hair of that colour instead of people like scandinavians and europeans who live in relatively green areas.

    Comment by Sean — August 24, 2008 @ 10:19 pm

  231. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Naturally-Blonde-Blacks-48181.shtml

    Comment by Sean — August 24, 2008 @ 10:25 pm

  232. And also the whole blondes being prettier thing is bull it depends more on the facial features. I personally would HATE to live in a world of all blonde blue eyed supermodels. Then they would think that black or red hair with brown eyes was the best =D

    Comment by Sean — August 24, 2008 @ 10:56 pm

  233. [...] The Blonde Map of Europe [...]

    Pingback by *** « Стежинка — September 2, 2008 @ 12:29 pm

  234. Many kids in Spain have light hair but as we grow up it gets darker.You can see people with light hair all over Spain.

    Comment by Spain — September 2, 2008 @ 11:09 pm

  235. north eu ftw , i love blondes:)

    Comment by ian — September 8, 2008 @ 12:10 am

  236. [...] (tags: humor via:mento.info) 214 – The Blonde Map of Europe « Strange Maps "According to this map – and if you really believe that blondes have less brains –a nasty [...]

    Pingback by links for 2008-09-12 at dekay.org — September 12, 2008 @ 2:32 pm

  237. [...] ni kollar på kartan så finns det en del som har ljust hår t ex i Spanien,Portugal och [...]

    Pingback by Jag är nog inte så dum som en blondin! « Nu eller aldrig… — September 14, 2008 @ 10:10 pm

  238. This map is interesting, but complete bunk. I showed it to a Swedish friend of mine, and she simply laughed, mainly because the definition of “blonde” differs by culture anyway (she is what we Americans would call a “dirty blonde” but what Swedes might consider a brunette).

    These ideas do seem pretty common, and seem to be rooted in racial/ethnic stereotypes. When you begin to pick through them, you discover the contradictions. For instance, notice that there is talk on this map of how the Scottish Highlands have less blondes than northern England because of “dark haired Celts” – but then Galicia has MORE blondes than Spain because of the “fair haired Celts!”. Same goes for the Kola Peninsula being non-blonde because of the “dark-haired Saami/Lapps”. Aren’t the Saami related to the super-blonde Finns? Aren’t they technically MORE blonde??

    It reminds me of the old saw about blondes living in Afghanistan because of “Alexander the Great’s army”, which is cute except that I don’t recall Macedonians and Greeks being more blonde than, say, Iranians or peoples from the Caucasus. I lived in Central Asia for some years and I can say that there are quite a few naturally blonde-haired blue-eyed Central and Northern Asians (to say nothing of green-eyed redheads as well) with no more distictive European lineage or features than the general population. And plenty of Russians and other European inhabitants of the region are not blonde. So these theories be damned.

    Comment by Kochevnik — September 20, 2008 @ 1:26 pm

  239. can somebody provide real data??
    the map seem fall in big mistakes
    i dont believe anyshit in this map
    i would like to read some real stats.

    Comment by MARK — October 8, 2008 @ 4:43 pm

  240. To Doina, from Moldova:

    Hi Doina! I am 100% Portuguese, with natural blonde hair and blue eyes. Actually, the region where I come from (and that region is not signed on that map) people are mostly blonde, light eyes and fair skin. So, it all depends on the region those Portuguese you know are from.

    Lots of people are saying here, blonde in some areas come from their Celtic origin. This is extremely wrong. Celts were far from being blonde. The Celts had dark hair.

    Comment by Isabel — October 9, 2008 @ 7:52 pm

  241. isabel the mistake is that what you call blonde in europe we call it brown, and what u consider brown there we consider black.

    blonde hair in northern-central europe you must have a hair color to be in this category. im sure you are a brown haired girl and as almsot every portuguese have black or very darj brown hair then u seem blonde in contrast to them.
    Have u been in denmark? sweden? holland?
    google kimi raikkonen and compare his hair wich yours ;)
    i bet yours is way darker

    Comment by MARK — October 11, 2008 @ 3:22 pm

  242. Hi Mark,

    I understand your point and though my hair is slightly darker than Raikkonen, but my brother is of the same shade. My father had an extreme light blonde hair. I think this comes from lots of stereotypes, that in southern Europe nobody is blonde. I was born in the North of Portugal, and almost everybody from my small village is blonde (some darker, others much lighter). If it’s true the majority of Portuguese have brown hair – the predominant color – it’s not correct to say, Portuguese or Spanish do not have blonde hair. Two years ago, I was in Tallin, Estonia and both my hair and skin, were lighter than lots of locals. Bizarre as it may seem, you can believe it.

    Comment by Isabel — October 17, 2008 @ 10:36 pm

  243. yeah can be i heard lighter zone of iberian perninsula is in portugal and not spain . it is called minho .. are you from there? yes most spanish and italians have dark brown and black hair … so dont think in medium or light brown, even genetic studies show that 44% of spaniards for dark brown hair and 28 % got black hair, so it is not the kind of brown hair u will find often in brunnete popularions within germany countries as a brunnete german,dutch or scandinavian will be often msotly light brown, or golden brown, and hardly darker than medoum-brown.
    UK and ireland got the exeption they got by far the highest amount of really dark haired people in northern europe, people with black and very dark brown hair is found in dozens if you visit wales, ireland, western scotland and western england and even present in eastern parts of scotland and england in lesser degree.

    well as i have noted estonians can be quite light complected but they also seem to be more heterogeneus than northwestern euros u can find people with very light blonde hair but also exist those with really dark hair wich still look baltic and they would never be confused with spanish or italian as “dark brits” often tend to do.

    by the way if u saw that portugal is so light on some areas . how come only 7% have blue eyes and likely a 4% is blonde haired? explain me it…

    carletoons coon said blonde hair in spain is 7% and blue eyes are 18% while he only stated 7% of blue eyes for portuguese wich correlates a even smallest % of blonde hair wich should be around 4%.

    Comment by Mark — October 18, 2008 @ 1:14 pm

  244. Mark, go fuck your sister!

    Comment by Blue Haired — October 19, 2008 @ 6:46 am

  245. Isabel, if you are in Braga, call me! I like blondes, even the dark type ones.

    Comment by Blue Haired — October 19, 2008 @ 6:48 am

  246. It is a matter of course that this matter does not matter. It is a matter without spirit, a passion without heart, it is a vein without blood, a cheese without salt but filled with an extreme amount of holes.

    Minho,pronounced like Miño in spanish, Migno in italian or french, is a small area in the north of Portugal, formerly the south of Galicia. The Suevi, a germanic people settled there. They were brave and good barbarians that fought alongside the slaves against the slave owners of the then moribund roman empire. Its most famous hero is Quim Barreiros and its national anthem is A Cabritinha.

    Comment by Blue Haired — October 19, 2008 @ 7:12 am

  247. [...] 214 – The Blonde Map of Europe Strange Maps __________________ Fresh! Funky! New! *blink* *blink* Umfrage: Haarfarbe bei Frauen Umfrage: Haarfarbe bei Mnnern === Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven === [...]

    Pingback by Lsterecke - Seite 180 - Lovetalk.de — October 20, 2008 @ 3:44 pm

  248. this map is very inaccurate and based on stereotypes. it would be interesting to know what the authors of people intend with blond because the are various gradation. So a person who is considered blond in bulgaria would be considered brown in germany as german person would be considered nazi in every other country except germany ;)

    Comment by dsdsd — October 31, 2008 @ 10:02 pm

  249. wow, are we still living in nazi times?
    What the fuck does your hair color and your eye color have to do with anything? Aren’t we all humans?

    It’s this thoughs, that are keeping us apart. That creat hatred.

    Grow up. All of you!

    Comment by Portucale — October 31, 2008 @ 11:46 pm

  250. [...] Sweden.  Pros: I think I would like the weather there.  It’s nice and cool in the summer, snowy and cold in the winters.  The people seem to be nice and have good personal hygene.  They have a Prime Minister too, so that’s always a plus (actually I don’t know why, but I’ve always had a president, so it’s time for a change).   Also, one of my top fave bands of all time is ABBA.  Cons: I don’t think I’d like the food there.  The other day I went to IKEA and the food looked disgusting! Would you like some fries with your doggie barf?  I wouldn’t be surprised the government makes people eat shit like this.  How else would you eat barf-covered poopballs?  Also, I’m into brunettes. [...]

    Pingback by If John McCain wins, I’m moving away to… « St. Alex of the Knife — November 4, 2008 @ 7:54 pm

  251. Hello I’m from lithuania
    Firstable, in lithuania actually is a lot of blondes, i’m dark blonde, or light brown if you like, but when I was like 7 years old I had nearly white hair, and later my hair start to getting darker :(.

    But whatever. I noticed that most of blondes hair people, are in norway, sweden, finland, estonia, latvia, lithuania, north poland and a little bit of west russia, and that area is when was last ice age in europe 10000 BC. Isn’t that weird? Maybe that area near baltic sea it’s kinda special, where people are born with light hair

    Comment by Robert — November 11, 2008 @ 10:02 pm

  252. People from britain is mostly dark haired. Over there dark haired people really outnumber natural blondes. Tell me how much natural blondes are there in UK, North america, Australia or New zeland, there are more fake than natural blondes over there checking random profile sites they happen to be mostly brown haired and they dont remain too often in blonde when they are over 15 years old!!!!!!!!!! In other part we have scandinavia and northern continental europe, places like denmark, northern germany and netherlands where most people is natural blonde and are way taller, fit and slender than rounder fat americans and other people in english speaking countries that have native breton and dark british heritage

    Comment by Mark — November 13, 2008 @ 3:11 pm

  253. But whatever. I noticed that most of blondes hair people, are in norway, sweden, finland, estonia, latvia, lithuania, north poland and a little bit of west russia, and that area is when was last ice age in europe 10000 BC. Isn’t that weird? Maybe that area near baltic sea it’s kinda special, where people are born with light hair

    you are right but you forget also the danish,dutch and northern german people who also happens to be very blonde in average. so blondest countries are baltic countries (estonia,lithuania.latvia) + scandinavia (finland,sweden,norway,dernmark,iceland) + netherlands and northern provinces of germany (westfalia, lower saxony, shwelstig holstein and around mackleburg valley)

    If you see all europe above the rhine is quite blond but with the exception of uk and ireland wich happen to be mostly brown haired cause they got neolithic (native breton and celtic heritage) wich happen to be linked with basques. The irish,welsh,cornish,devonish,western scot and western english happen to be very dark compared to other northern european populations

    Comment by Mark — November 13, 2008 @ 7:46 pm

  254. super!!

    Comment by nicolas — November 16, 2008 @ 6:57 pm

  255. Many Americans are of German heritage and they are still fat and round faced. From what I have seen English people are probably more blond than Germans, especially those in Southern Germany, visit Eastern England instead of London and you will see.

    Comment by Tom — November 21, 2008 @ 6:04 am

  256. I agree east anglia, yorkshire, etc are the blondest parts of uk. Much blonder than the western part of the isles,and blonder than southern germany, but it isn’t as blonde as the north of germany, scandinavia, netherlands or the baltic states (estonia,lithuania,latvia) and norwestern russia and northern
    poland.

    There is big difference between average east anglian and average cornish, welsh and devonish.
    Wich percent of east anglians would u say are in the category fair? i mean blonde hair including lighbrown shades? how many of them are just blonde (light and golden blonde)?
    Imo australians are darker haired than americans cause australian have much higher irish component wich happens to be by far the most darker haired europeans , along with the welsh, devonish ,cornish and western scots

    Comment by Mark — November 22, 2008 @ 3:05 am

  257. i mean about irish the most dark haired northern europeans. they even shouldn’t be considered so since many of them are decendent of celts wich came originally from southern areas of europe.
    galatia, wales, wallonia,galia, galicia are all related celtic names.

    Comment by Mark — November 22, 2008 @ 3:08 am

  258. Northern italian….from the veneto region are stunning…mediterean shaped eyes, but often blue or green, light olive skin and dark blonde to medium brown hair. Does the blondness reflect in the neatness and order that is found in this part of italy unlike other areas???

    Comment by Adam Rigoni — November 25, 2008 @ 6:34 am

  259. Being a blonde myself have to say I love this blog…

    Comment by GoldieLocks — December 1, 2008 @ 1:39 pm

  260. hi, i am from moldova and i have chestnun-brown hair and hazel yes. the majority people of moldova and romania has this hair. there are and persons with black hair and green eyes. and there are persons with black hair and blue yes, but the majority are brunets

    Comment by Ştefan — December 13, 2008 @ 5:07 pm

  261. the map is a whole shit..
    northern germans and dutch are far blonder than english people.
    Austrians, southern-germans and czech (even if they arent as blonde like northern germans) are definitely way blonder than majority of french people.
    flemish are blonder than wallons wich resemble mostly french. and dutch are blonder than flemish specially those living over the rhine. There are not big differences between different areas in scandinavia as the maps show, but just western norwegians got sometimes more commonly dark features than other scandinavians (wich no means by anyway that they are dark since they are still far blonder than most of europeans) but somewhat lesser people with ash blonde shades compared to the east of norway. baltic countries are quite blonde specially estonia, same goes for western parts of russia.

    for me that map is nonsense if i should group europeans by pigmentation it would be mostly likely that:

    1)Very light europeans: Swedes, Norwegians, Finns, Icelanders, Danes, Dutch, Northern Germans, Estonians, Lithuanians, Latvians, Northwestern Russians, Belarus? (maybe ) Northern Poland? (not sure of the last 2)

    2)Light Europeans: Germans (from central Germany) ,Flemish, East anglians, Most poles, czech, Ukranians, Western russians,

    3)Intermediate europeans: Germans (from bavaria and baden), Austrians, Swiss (mainly from germanic speaking switzerland)Northern French and alsatian, Walloons, Western brits.

    4) Intermediate to dark: Most French, south tyroleans, croatians, hungarians? , Irish, north balcans.

    5) Dark: Spaniards, Italian,south balcanic.
    6) Very dark: sardinans, calabrians, andalusians, Greeks, Cypriot, Maltese.

    All those are about hair color, not skin or eyes.

    Comment by Mark — December 16, 2008 @ 2:10 am

  262. sorry for my bad english.I think all about spain is wrong or myts.
    I am from leon(center north).blondes in galicia are mith and i think there are more blondes in andalucia than north areas of spain.and in other areas of spain little villages have many blondes and other littles villages near 10 km people are different and dark complexion.too i worked in airport and is very difficcult know is italian or spaniard.

    Comment by luciano — December 16, 2008 @ 10:16 pm

  263. [...] Strange Maps Este post fue escrito por alsanan y publicado en Sun 11 May 08 at 19:12 and filed under Uncategorized. Bookmark the enlace permanente. Sigue los comentarios introducidos aquí con el feed RSS de este post. Introducir un comentario o dejar un trackback: Trackback URL. « Microsoft y Yahoo! y Facebook y quien se ponga a tiro Post-it transl » [...]

    Pingback by alsanan.info » Mapa europeo de personas rubias — December 17, 2008 @ 8:29 pm

  264. There is more blond hair in the East of Britain and more brunette in the West of Britain, mirroring the coastline of Europe in fact. If you are Welsh, Irish Scottish your ancestors were most likely Spaniards, the English are descended from the Anglosaxons – from Holland through to Norway. The English days of the week are still named after gods from anglosaxon times, Thursday is old english for Thor’s Day for example.

    Comment by Paul White — December 18, 2008 @ 1:34 pm

  265. Then explain me why such fascination in english speaking countries such as Usa, Canada , australia and britain?
    Most girls there dye their hair blonde cause they are natural brunettes (mostly mousy brown)
    so tell me why they want to imitate real blonde people from northern europe??
    i bet there are even more natural blondes in central europe or eastern europe by a large margin than let say canada, australia or nz. so does that means the Brits are not really northern european in genetics? since what i have seen about them is mostly dark haired people with rounder heads rather than tall blonde leptosome nordids…

    Comment by Mark — December 21, 2008 @ 6:31 pm

  266. So that means most austrialians ,NZ. canadians and americans are descendants from mostly west britain since they are mostlu dark haird, or fake blondes, compare them with denmark hahaha

    Comment by Mark — December 21, 2008 @ 6:33 pm

  267. [...] am listening to mariah carey’s always be my baby right now. this reminds me of traveling to europe. me and keenan had a handful of songs we sung while strolling the streets and this was one of them. [...]

    Pingback by about: _______ » Blog Archive » winter vacation — December 22, 2008 @ 11:44 pm

  268. [...] Resulta interesante ver que la parte central de Suecia tiene más porcentaje de población con el pelo claro que el resto. Así mismo, a pesar, de la inmigración sufrida por el país escandinavo, la tasa global sueca se mantiene siempre por encima del 50%. También resulta curioso ver que en el noroeste de la península ibérica, en Galicia en especial (quizá por su origen céltico), el porcentaje es similar al de países como Alemania, Polonia, los países del este y superior al del resto de España. ¿Conocíais ese dato? A mi me ha sorprendido bastante. Si os apetece una explicación detallada del mapa (en inglés) podéis leerla aquí. [...]

    Pingback by Blog de sweetsweden.com - explicando Suecia en español » Blog Archive » Blondinjakt — December 26, 2008 @ 7:54 am

  269. I think the most of men like women blondes.maybe this is the reason of this pages.women blondes or walkirias. but the blondes women of east of europe, for example russia,checkia,ucrania poland etc are with oriental features,bodys with tight arms and legs.to me this women are the most beatiful of all.i saw women from scandinavia,england, german,east europe,french,italian etc because i had live in mallorca many years and i like all but east europe are the best for me.and for you? Who are the most beatiful women in europe?.Thanks and sorry for my bad english.

    Comment by luciano — December 26, 2008 @ 4:27 pm

  270. maybe thats your impression cause you live in a dark-haired country like spain, so in most of world countries people will see blondes as something different. look all asians and africans have black hair. most southern europeana and people from southern balcans have black or dark brown hair (with a minority lighthaired wich often aren’t lighter than lightbrown-dark blonde) so for all the rest of world population women from central, eastern and northern europe will be different , specially those very blondes that you will find everywhere in northern europe

    Comment by Mark — December 27, 2008 @ 4:50 pm

  271. I know people in spain that like mixed or mulato people from southamerica,too spain girls with boyfriend from africa ,nigger or black,without money.,even spaniards that travel to cuba or southamerica and bring a girlfriend from this poor countryes.for me its incredible and stranges tastes.too in mallorca i saw many english women with boyfriends black,hindu or very dark skin.generallly i think dark or black skin like more women than men.
    pleae put or calificate from 1 to 10 my english letter and expresion or composition.thanks

    Comment by luciano — January 1, 2009 @ 5:06 pm

  272. BLONDES DO IT BETTER who think anything else is just jealous :)

    Comment by Mark — January 13, 2009 @ 9:55 pm

  273. STUPID TITLE OF THIS MAP! Light hair mean- light blonde, dark blond and light brown.

    Comment by Abc — January 15, 2009 @ 9:38 am

  274. “Light hair mean- light blonde, dark blond and light brown”

    then i think 75% of northern europeans join in this category.. either light/golden blonde , red, darkblonde, lightbrown.

    Comment by Mark — January 19, 2009 @ 4:54 pm

  275. british people is not blonde
    most of the blondes get the color from a bottle
    its the same case in the US, Australia, Canada, NZ.

    Comment by Markzz — January 22, 2009 @ 12:32 am

  276. HAVE A LOOK AT THE MAP HERE, in the 2nd post by Peewee:

    http://www.eupedia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=24315

    Looks very accurate, according to my personal experience around Europe.

    I think this survey should be conducted on men only, as children are generally blonder than adults, and men tend not to dye their hair. That would give the truest picture.

    On the British, they cannot be treated as one, due to waves of invasion and variable mixtures of Celtic and Germanic. I would say the Welsh are mostly dark-haired. The English are the lightest-haired in Britain, but darker in the South and West. The Scots are mostly dark-haired, except on the East Coast.

    Also Britain and Ireland have one thing to be proud of. They have the largest percentage of red haired people in the World, which I think is rather beautiful!

    Comment by Pete — January 22, 2009 @ 6:19 pm

  277. I’ve found the English to be definitely fairer-haired than the Southern Germans/Swiss/Austrians. Recent stats actually show them to be taller (and heavier not surprisingly) than most continental ‘germanics’ too. Obviously the Irish and Welsh have more dark hair, but are still on average much fairer than the meditteranean countries, perhaps it’s just the prevalence of light eyes and very fair skin amongst them that gives that impression.I live in Denmark, where black hair is much more common than stereotype allows.
    As for Spain, it seems there are people there with Nordicist delusions/wishes. I’ve been right through the areas often cited as ‘blond’ and natural blonds or even lighter brown-haired people are too few to mention. Also what they (and likeminded french too) call ‘blond’, a northern European would call ‘brown’, even ‘dark brown’. This kind of Spaniard will generally insist foreigners who think them dark are mistaking gypsy immigrants for real Spaniards – it’s strange how adament they get about this. I was there for work and was hassled a couple of times: I’m mousy brown-haired-blond by their definition-and actually a NZer of Irish/Danish ancestry, they thought me English and felt obligated to tell me how how fair a lot of Spanish are, despite what every foreigner who’s visited Spain thinks…

    Comment by Christian — January 23, 2009 @ 10:28 am

  278. Pete the map you posted doenst make sense the dutch are far blonder than the english, and nowhere in the british isles is as blonde as scandinavia,holland or northern germany. The people from estonia lithuania and latvia is also generally far blonder than any brit even english.

    Comment by Mark — January 24, 2009 @ 7:55 pm

  279. christian go away… brits tend to be taller than continental germanics? no way
    average dutch is 184.8 cm
    average northern german probably aroundd the same since i was there.
    average danes is around 182.5 cm
    average brit is listed as 175/176 cm lot of brits are dwarf , even english people-

    Comment by Mark — January 24, 2009 @ 8:01 pm

  280. Mark, I said ‘most continental Germanics (and I use ‘germanic’ purely in the language sense). I took it for granted that everyone knows the Dutch are Europe’s tallest, followed closely by the Scandinavians. It’s certainly been covered in the news enough lately. But Brits are, apparently, number three on the height scale. Surprised me too.I think that 175/76 figure is decades old.The Northern Germans obviously get lost in their national average. You seem to be very prejudiced towards British/English so your comments lack objectivity. Perhaps you should go away or at least read people’s posts properly.
    Anyway this map is nonsense – blondism, as in really blond, is only at 30% for Scandinavia, which makes this map kinda suspect.

    Comment by Christian — January 25, 2009 @ 9:38 am

  281. i just point that brits are a mix of northern europeans with southwestern europeans (basques and others. They dont usually look northern germanic as other native people in northern europe

    Comment by Mark — January 25, 2009 @ 4:07 pm

  282. i take this from wikipedia

    United Kingdom 176.8 cm (5′ 9.6″) 163.7 cm (5′ 4.4″) 16–24 Measured 2006

    United Kingdom 175.2 cm (5′ 8.9″) 161.6 cm (5′ 3.6″) 16+ Measured 2006

    Germany 178.1 cm (5′ 10.1″) 165 cm (5′ 5.0″) Entire population 2005 [19][20]
    Germany 180.3 cm (5′ 11.0″) 167 cm (5′ 5.7″) 18–19 2005 [19][20]

    germans are fall taller than brits
    and if they would ahve included just northern germans the difference were even more big.

    Comment by Mark — January 25, 2009 @ 7:40 pm

  283. How do you measure ‘Northern Germanic’? I think Germans, Dutch, Scandinavians and English (at least the stereotype exemplars, a minority everywhere) all look distinct from one another, so who’s the yard stick?
    And Dutch exhibit actually similar frequencies of the Rb1 haplogroup, the so-called ‘Basque’ genetic marker, to the English (70 compared to 75%). Danes have 50%. So all Atlantic fringe people have an ancient Basque mix.Personally I’ve never seen a Brit who would really pass for an Iberian/Meditteranean, not even in Atlantic Ireland or Wales, despite what Victorian Englishmen stereotyped. Beyound hair color there is also complexion, eye color and set, beard density etc. Variety is what I love about Europe.

    Comment by Christian — January 25, 2009 @ 7:46 pm

  284. Well then i think you have never been to britain before. They are mixed with sowestern europeans , everybody know this
    Look at tom jones, victoria beckham, catherine zeta jones, colin farrel , orlando bloom. none of them looks germanic but rather native brit. Greetings .

    Comment by Mark — January 25, 2009 @ 8:13 pm

  285. I’ve lived there in fact, whereas some of your comments suggest you’ve only ever been a fleeting visitor in this part of this world, sorry if I’m wrong. The people you cite mostly come from that Atlantic fringe, where the DNA reads the highest rb1 frequency-Wales, Ireland etc so they definitely are ‘native brit’, with the exception of Bloom, but I know curly dark-haired Danes too. But if you actually read my post you’ll see that ‘Basque’ percentage is high accross the Atlantic seaboard-including Holland and Western Germany and Denmark. So I wouldn’t wield Atlantic Europe’s ancient ’south west’ roots as an accusation, as you seem to, because assuming you do have some connection to this area they’re your roots too.

    Comment by Christian — January 26, 2009 @ 7:57 am

  286. why should this map be informative to anybody?
    I suggest to you people to use your free time and help the poor and the weak of your time (whatever their hair color…).
    FYI, many humain beings are starving due to wars.

    regards,
    John Doe

    Comment by john Doe — January 26, 2009 @ 1:52 pm

  287. You’re totally right.
    So that’s one lot of bloggers chastised, “John”, about a billion or so to go. Guess we’re not the only ones not spending our time wisely.

    Comment by Christian — January 26, 2009 @ 7:12 pm

  288. PS. Mark, i shouldn’t have to tell you to beware wikipedia stats, they are obviously at the mercy of people like you and me. Keep an eye on the height chart, you’ll see come countries heights go up and down.

    Comment by Christian — January 26, 2009 @ 9:38 pm

  289. to comment 277 by cristian:

    maybe,shoutern germans or austrians could be less fair than brits but nothing way brits taller.
    i worked trhree years in airport mallorca in security with miles of people brit,german,austrian etc every day in check machine.
    as for spain its difficccult to me understand the mean you want to tell.gipsys,real spaniard,inmigrants,mistaking,foreigners thinks?.
    stranges words:delusions,likeminded,adament,hassled, mousy brown.
    speak clerly,please.

    Comment by leones — January 27, 2009 @ 11:16 am

  290. to comment 283 by cristian:

    i think you never go out home.

    you never know nobody in britania that pass for iberian mediterranean people?.its a joke.sure.
    gordon brown,zapatero,fernando torres,xavi alonso,lampard,could be from iberia or britannia for exemple if yoy no know them previously.
    i worked in airport mallorca three years and every day sow many people.
    you no have idea about nothing.

    Comment by leones — January 27, 2009 @ 11:35 am

  291. to leones.

    Yes you are right what i meant is that brits have different features than continental germanics , specially if u mean by that ( nothern geramans, netherlanders, and scandinavians) they usually have more dark hair also, correct me if im not wrong, many of them wouldn’t look that out of place walking in a street in iberia as some average swede, dane, dutch or northern german would.

    Comment by Mark — January 27, 2009 @ 2:06 pm

  292. Leones, you must be the first Spanish person I’ve encountered who thinks Brits look like them (god others I’ve met would be horrified by the idea). Yes they can be dark-haired more frequently than many of their northern neighbours but their features aren’t the same as Iberians. Mark, go to the holiday spots in Spain and Brits stand out a mile away, even the dark-haired ones – it’s not a compliment to them. And I think Germans and English people do look alike in many cases. The Dutch and Scandinavians are more distinctive. I saw another survey lately that said physically Brits are most often confused for Belgians (??!!) I don’t get it either.
    As for the height thing, I withdraw it – I was simply quoting a recent, European-wide study by the University of Nottingham. It was purely FYI.
    Leones, I was recounting my encounters in Spain with Nordicist Spaniards who thinking me British decided to lecture me ir on how ‘blond’ Spanish people really are. Which was news to me-though I agree that Spaniards are frequently fairer than foreign stereotype allows. It happened three times, I thought I was jinxed. Of course I know these weren’t typical Spanish people.
    And I do speak clearly, if you want to participate on an English blog you can’t insist people dumb down their language, try google translate, it’s much more effective these days.

    Comment by Christian — January 27, 2009 @ 3:27 pm

  293. Christian i agree with you in the fact you can tell apart brits from spaniards easily. But there are some case of people from the british isles and ireland, not only cause their pigmentation but also features who could look not so out of place in spain such people like colin farrel or other people in cornwall,devon and wales. But im not telling with this point that most british look iberian at all and yes the thing you said that most brits are confused with belgians is not too far from reality since both populations could be considered celto-germanic , even some parts of north eastern france could.

    germans depends form where they are also , the norther germans over the river rhine are often as northern european looking as any scandinavian of dutch person. but southern germans look often different and you can spot them in those other countries , same goes for austrians. the later being more stockier and being less often displaying extreme blondism.

    btw aren’t you some of those people who join in racialist sites such as skadi, stirpes or stormfront? cause you sound like one of those. greetings

    Comment by Mark — January 27, 2009 @ 5:11 pm

  294. I read them out of interest, which is why I got the impression you were the one of them, a foreigner with some ancestry from here fixated on the idea that the typical-or worthy-Dutchman or Scandinavian is Rutger Hauer or Dolph Lundgren, which I can assure you, as a local ain’t quite the reality. Correct me if I’m wrong, in which case we should both choose our words more carefully. “Greetings”.

    Comment by Christian — January 27, 2009 @ 5:41 pm

  295. PS. I’ve agreed with you on the dark element in Britain,I’ve even bored you with the DNA proof. But believe it or not there are people in Scandinavia and Holland on the same level of darkness, granted not quite to Mr Farrell’s level. They even have a similar myth to Ireland here in Denmark: that black-haired people in Jutland are Spanish-descended, in this case from Napoleonic era Spanish mercenaries employed here. I know not to the same level as Atlantic Britain.

    Comment by Christian — January 27, 2009 @ 5:58 pm

  296. i also heard the same about parts of norway such as westernmost norway belong a bit to the atlantic fringe and you can find some dark haired people more often than eastern norwegians.

    BTW Rutger Hauer or Dolph Lundgren are quite common types in their home countries but that doesnt mean that everybody should be like that over there , for sure there is a bit more variety , but finding a dark person form those countries who pass as spanish is very hard, but some who could pass as french is not so uncommon , still not stereotypical and easy as meeting a typical nordic looking person.

    Comment by Mark — January 27, 2009 @ 7:33 pm

  297. The Map is fantastic.

    Comment by jeff(Visitedeurope.com) — January 28, 2009 @ 11:22 am

  298. to mark 291:

    I agree with you,specially scandinavians and netherlanders(taller than brit too).as for german sorry but i not distingued shoutern german and northern german( but all german are taller and strong than brit).

    Comment by leones — January 28, 2009 @ 3:49 pm

  299. to cristian 292:

    sorry i dont know work with google translate.
    i agree with you,generally the features of brit arent the same the brits but you tell in 283 you never see somebody in brit could pass for iberian or mediterranean.its exagerate.
    and too in 283 told relationship between german and basque country and for me basque and german are totally different .fisically spaniard and basque are the same and i know well both.i worked in vitoria,pamplona,san sebastian several years.
    sorry but other parts of yours post i dont understand you.

    Comment by leones — January 28, 2009 @ 4:11 pm

  300. i dont know if cristian only have been in north of spain but in spain more ligter or less no relation with south or north.in fact studies show that in the south and east there are less traces of africaans or jews genetics than in west and northwest spain.
    on the other hand i think in brit there are people only could be brit.its funny for me.for example paul shooles or wayne rooney.both in all street of nort of south of europe them walked.. people thinks them as brits and only brits.

    Comment by leones — January 28, 2009 @ 4:30 pm

  301. i want to see in first line 292:
    generally the features of brit arent the same iberian……

    Comment by leones — January 28, 2009 @ 4:35 pm

  302. leones you are right they have a distinctive look, but what i pointed is that people from scandinavia, holland, and germany(specially the north) tend to looks more often as people imagine northern europeans, tall , blonde , narrow horse faced or strong jawed, with big build and very blue eyes. People from britain often looks as if they come from nowhere but britain, and they are not often fitting in the classical nordic looks of very blond tall leptosome narrow faced dude like the scandinavians, dutch and northerngermans do most of time.
    There are also very blonde tall people in estonia, lithuania and latvia (though not so tall in average) but still tall and quite blonde and display some eastern nordic variants of faces, also many belarusians and northwestern russians look as nord as it comes, just look at elena dementieva.

    Comment by Mark — January 28, 2009 @ 5:43 pm

  303. i think finns are the blondest of the world.. everybody envies them..they are the blondest..all people want to be blond, for that there are so many jealous brunettes outside northern europe, in countries like usa, uk, australia, asia , northafrica, latin america

    Comment by Mark — January 28, 2009 @ 5:52 pm

  304. kovalainen. hakkinen, raikkonen 3 very blonde finish drivers.

    Comment by Mark — January 28, 2009 @ 5:53 pm

  305. Leones, I think we’re in agreement. And I don’t believe ethnic Spanish people anywhere are anything but entirely European.
    Mark: You come clean and say ‘Everyone wants to be blond.. jealous brunettes etc’. Do you want to blond, Mark? You haven’t denied my suggestion you don’t come from these countries you claim to be an expert on. As for Finland: yes some can be very blond, but others,not just a few, very, very dark. Here in Scandinavia blond Finns are usually assumed to be from the small ethnic Swedish minority – and I know that isn’t correct, as the surnames you list prove.

    Comment by Christian — January 28, 2009 @ 7:28 pm

  306. Actually ‘narrow horse-faced’, as you phrase it is one of the most common descriptions for British-once again not intended as a compliment. ‘Teutonics’ are stereotyped as broad-faced, hence the insulting WW1/WW2 name ’square-heads’.And I wouldn’t get too carried away with your Aryan fantasies about ‘big build etc’, remember average height means there are as many people below that average as above it.To quote you precisely: *the classical nordic looks of very blond tall leptosome narrow faced dude like the scandinavians, dutch and northerngermans do most of the time’…try visiting here, and maybe lift your head from you Coon and Beddoe books this time.

    Comment by Christian — January 28, 2009 @ 7:40 pm

  307. i have been in northern europe and i dont have to my head from coon and beddoe books.

    i wasnt talking about all people want to be blond, but rather talking about women, seem nowadays all women want to be blond, if they dont have it natural they bleach it. Men couldn’t care less often as there is portrayed dark haired men more masculine than blonde one by the media.

    Comment by Mark — January 29, 2009 @ 1:25 am

  308. Well that’s true enough. Though Australian sportsmen do have a tacky fondness for bleach.

    Comment by Christian — January 29, 2009 @ 12:05 pm

  309. to christian 305:

    according studies genetics spaniard show south(andalucia mainly),east and noreast of spain nothing traces of africaans and traces of jews i dont remember.
    but in northwest,west spain:
    5 per cent africaans traces aproximately and 10 or 15 per cent of jews traces.
    and i think christian you are very young.to be or not to be blond is not important if you are man.the most important is to have money for blondes or brunettes.

    Comment by leones — January 29, 2009 @ 2:22 pm

  310. generally i agree with the mark comments and i understand him.
    i like to know where christian are and which is the mother language because i dont understand well his comments.sorry
    i can to explain you how are the kosovo features people (albanian origin mainly)i have been 2 months here if somebody want.

    Comment by leones — January 29, 2009 @ 2:36 pm

  311. Leones, you’re right, you’re not understanding me. I’m not blond and perfectly happy with that. Don’t have much money either – not so happy with that.

    I’ve just been explaining that it is ridiculous to stereotype Scandinavians, Dutch etc as all blond, it’s not reality. More like 30-40% are blond at the very most. People here in Scandinavia are actually far less obsessed with blondness than some people in other countries where it’s less common. Thankfully the Nazi invaders never won Danes over to their master race crap-

    And what do Albanian people look like? I read Al Qaeda is trying to recruit ‘blond’ muslims in that area. Will they find many?

    Comment by Christian — January 29, 2009 @ 4:00 pm

  312. people albano-kosovar is fairer than spaniard or italian people.taller than spaniard and generally tights.could described as mixed between mediterranean and slave people more or less.i knew too here serbian people but for me is not easy distinguised against albanian.i knew too eslovenian people that look like german people(similar austrians).
    albano kosovar people dressed normal,not dressed as muslim and i think not practise nothing muslim religion,only very old people practise some.i think al quaeda not succes recruit in albania because religion not have many interest to albano-kosovar.

    Comment by leones — January 29, 2009 @ 6:56 pm

  313. christian ,i understand you lives in denmark and english is not you languague mother.What is the official languague in denmark?dannis,a languague similar to norwege or sweedis?

    Comment by leones — January 29, 2009 @ 7:02 pm

  314. Danish is a Germanic-Scandinavian language. It’s almost the same lanquage as Swedish and Norwegian. The differences are a bit like those between Catalan, Aragonese and Galician-more to do with local dialect and accent than really different languages. I should add though I live here, and was born here, I first started speaking and going to school while my family lived in New Zealand, so English is kind of my first language. Sorry you find me so hard to understand.

    Comment by Christian — January 29, 2009 @ 7:18 pm

  315. to christian: depends what do you consider blonde , but i have seen studies in farmers where people with blonde (light and golden) , people with darkblonde, light brown and red hair make around the 75% of the population in scandinavia,holland and northern germany. so that means that people with dark hair (darker than light-brown) makes nothing more than 25% of the population, so this depends how do you define blonde , but of course if you exclude dark blonde (as it is the blonde definition in northern europe) then probably real northern european blonde
    doesnt make more than 40%. and there is a difference between scandinavian brunettes, dutch brunettes and northern german brunettes ,… with brunettes of southern europe or outside europe, since the first ones have light brown hair often , while spanish or italian people have often black or dark brown hair. I have been in northern germany and netherlands and also been in italy. so for that they gained this stereotype since even most scandinavian sutch or nothern german brunettes would be called blonde in italy or spain , cause the blonde definition of northern countries is MUCH different than the one people outside europe and in southern europen countries use.

    and i agree populations in west europe are more mixed, u find more often a very dark haired estonian than a very dark haired northern german. but at the same time u find more often a blond albanian than a blonde portuguese. for that there is hard to find a 100% stereotypical southern european looking population even in southernmost east europe.

    Comment by Mark — January 30, 2009 @ 12:38 am

  316. Ok. Your figures seem in order. But remember 25% is a quarter of the population so pretty visible. Like most Northern European and Anglosphere people I consider blond to be just that: blond as in yellows and white. And I’ve firsthand experience of Meditteranean and South American peoples definition of blond. I’ve been called blond there – though in Danish my hair is called
    “leverpostej coloured” leverpostej is a light-medium brown pork liver paste people put on bread, (flattering, huh). Here it’s joked about as the boring norm.

    Comment by Christian — January 30, 2009 @ 8:14 am

  317. i agree totally with the mark explanation 315.
    thanks to christian for you answer in 314.I started to studied english at 33 years.i studied french when i was child.then my engllis is not good.

    Comment by leones — January 30, 2009 @ 11:48 am

  318. to christian:

    i used translated languague google.
    in a post before you say a family of brits in spain are distinguised from natives easily.i agree with you in this cases when you see a people group.
    but individually you think:
    spaniard tennis:nadal could pass to philippine man,carlos moya spaniard from mallorca like nadal and former number one tennis too could be to centroeurope man,verdasco could pass to algerian,ferrer could pass to french or swiss,ferrero former number one to could pass to britain,feliciano lopez could pass to centroeurope man ,tommy robredo centroeurope man etc.of course sportman in all countrys are taller and strong that ordinary people.to me is funny this variety.

    Comment by leones — January 30, 2009 @ 5:59 pm

  319. almagro looks really exotic..

    Comment by Mark — January 31, 2009 @ 10:06 pm

  320. almagro and verdasco are by far the most exotic lookin spanish tennis players (they look moroccan or algerian), nadal is just tanned nothing more and his hair isnt as dark like some asian person

    Comment by Mark — January 31, 2009 @ 10:08 pm

  321. mark.for one time i dont agree with you.i think the look like of almagro is very common in spain,but could pass for algerian or greek too,not moroccan.i saw now the final o australin open and the look like of nadal are by far the most exotic lookin spanish tennis players.nadal not could pass for normal spaniard,but federer could pass for spaniard perfectly.greetings

    Comment by leones — February 1, 2009 @ 10:34 am

  322. sorry mark, you are right.i saw almagro pictures now and he could pass for moroccaan too

    Comment by leones — February 1, 2009 @ 10:57 am

  323. the who , the beatles, pink floyd , black sabbath, deep purple, oasis, radiohead, tom jones.
    all of them happens to be predominantly dark featured that’s due to the fact most britons genetics come from pre-celtic inhabitants wich happens to be quite dark

    Comment by Mark — February 5, 2009 @ 6:28 pm

  324. germans way more blonde than brits.
    britons are dark like tom jones
    germans are blond like olive khan
    that’s in the rules :)

    Comment by Mark — February 5, 2009 @ 11:27 pm

  325. im not sure germans more blonds than brits.i was living years in area with germans from the whole german country(mallorca near the famous ballerman 6).i spoke with many of them and there are many germans with dark hair and tipical german noses and features,maybe them could come from the south of german.unfortunately i never ask me when i spoke them if they are fron north or south.not all germans are like khan or shuster(probably pure german features without mixed),but gerd muller,uli stilike,metzelder…
    are you english mark?

    Comment by leones — February 6, 2009 @ 7:01 pm

  326. If you see someone like ballack he have strong jaw and big features even if he has dark hair he don’t look mediterranean. Dark haired brits have often more Gracile features, therefore a more mediterranean looks

    Comment by Mark — February 6, 2009 @ 9:59 pm

  327. wow my first post in this discussion was 11 december of 2007 and it’s 6 february 2009 and i keep posting LOL

    Comment by Mark — February 7, 2009 @ 12:14 am

  328. Celtic blood is present in the majority of spaniards; what happens in Galicia is that they also have an important german influence (suevi peoples).

    In my town, south central Spain, i think blonde people average is similar to Galicia. My three surnames are of galician origin. The repopulation after the expusion of muslims can be the answer of this.

    Comment by castilian — February 7, 2009 @ 1:15 am

  329. to castilian:

    you could see my post number 309 about recent genetic study in spain.i travel very much to spain and i agree with this study.the reason was that jews and moors were expulsed by king catholics and in the cold and poor land of west spain cristian spaniard not pursuit or kill jews and moors.no way in galicia or asturias are blonder than neigbbours.in fact asturias have the most hight traits of jew genetic in spain.this was show in the journal la nueva españa last week.greetings

    Comment by leones — February 7, 2009 @ 7:09 pm

  330. to mark:

    i agree with you about the expression “gracile features” for the brits,probably brits have the most gracile features in the world but i dont think mediterranean people have the same delicatesen face.
    on the other hand i think the skin of brits are the most white in the world.the skin of brits not could be tanned despite put above the mediterranean sun many time(only red and burn),but german,scandinavian or holland people could tanned his skin when they take baths of sun.
    ¿this withe skin could be for the blood celtic?.
    there are too people in spain that no way take tanned above the sun(¿some blood celtic too?)

    Comment by leones — February 7, 2009 @ 7:24 pm

  331. to mark:

    i agree with you about the expression “gracile features” for the brits,probably brits have the most gracile features in the world but i dont think mediterranean people have the same delicatesen face.
    on the other hand i think the skin of brits are the most white in the world.the skin of brits not could be tanned despite put above the mediterranean sun many time(only red and burn),but german,scandinavian or holland people could tanned his skin when they take baths of sun.
    ¿this withe skin could be for the blood celtic?.
    there are too people in spain that no way take tanned above the sun(¿some blood celtic too?))

    Comment by leones — February 7, 2009 @ 7:25 pm

  332. to mark:

    i agree with you about the expression “gracile features” for the brits,probably brits have the most gracile features in the world but i dont think mediterranean people have the same delicatesen face.
    on the other hand i think the skin of brits are the most white in the world.the skin of brits not could be tanned despite put above the mediterranean sun many time(only red and burn),but german,scandinavian or holland people could tanned his skin when they take baths of sun.
    ¿this withe skin could be for the blood celtic?.
    there are too people in spain that no way take tanned above the sun(¿some blood celtic too?

    Comment by leones — February 7, 2009 @ 7:26 pm

  333. Mark. “Britons dark like Tom Jones”-I was almost disappointed when I went to Wales and no one actually looked like Tom Jones. The really dark Welshman of English stereotype is rare.
    “Germans blond like Olive..who..? Why not “Britons blond like Daniel Craig and Def Leppard” and “Germans dark like Martin Luther and 85% of famous Germans ever since” Not quite the rules as Germans and Britons follow them;)
    In fact in my opinion the two look a lot alike in many cases-that’s why English actors always play WW2 Germans in Hollywood. This new Tom Cruise movie ‘Valkryie’ is a classic example.
    I had to look up “gracile”- I disagree. I think Scandinavians are Europe’s most gracile featured – if you mean the dictionary definition of gracile as ’slender’. Where are you from BTW?

    Comment by Christian — February 7, 2009 @ 10:17 pm

  334. leones, they maybe aren’t descendant of jews, they maybe come from much older migrations from Eastern Mediterraneum, scientist like Stephen Oppenheimer thik so and i agree because the majority of jews were expeled.

    Mooris genes in the north also can be explaned with very ancient migrations (i heard Pasiegos from Cantabria descend of a very ancient berber migration).

    Comment by castilian — February 8, 2009 @ 12:17 am

  335. to castilian:
    i only say that in west and northwest spain jews traces with people with 4 grandfathers spaniard are the media about 10 per cent,in asturias 20 per cent,of course the rest percentage other peoples.the genetic not lie.

    Comment by leones — February 8, 2009 @ 12:06 pm

  336. the coach spain football team luis aragones not choose raul footballer despite the pressure of jornalist from madrid(all supporters real madrid).
    as result this decission:SPAIN CHAMPION EUROPE.
    the real reason of luis aragones was that raul is bin laden`son.
    if you see his features he is bin laden young.ha ha ha.
    this wedesnay spain england match.

    Comment by leones — February 8, 2009 @ 12:21 pm

  337. to cristian and mark.
    maybe the adecuate word is not gentile but gentle is better for brits.gentle and pale.
    ask you whoever women :how gentle david beckam is?.
    but too ask you whoever women:: how gentle mr.bean is?.
    to add in spain the enemys of zapatero constantly compare him with m.bean

    Comment by leones — February 8, 2009 @ 5:53 pm

  338. ´blond hair is due mainly to germanics who conquered galicia and assaulted galicia during some centuries(normans), being this contribution higher in galicia than in other not extremely higher but higher. Despite the mixture in these times walking in santiago d ecompostela for example you can see people who are typical swedish guys.

    Comment by deam — February 10, 2009 @ 4:36 pm

  339. Deam. Would it only be due to Germanics? The Visigoths and Suebi were only a small ruling elite. And the Normans were only a handful.
    What about the Celt-Iberians? Or the Slavic mercenaries the Moors bought in?

    Comment by Christian — February 11, 2009 @ 9:29 am

  340. ok the question is taht the germanics were clearly blond, in the case of celts I think this colour of hair was minoritary. It’s obvious the main contribution to the existence of this hair was given by different germanic groups.

    Comment by deam — February 11, 2009 @ 6:11 pm

  341. Deam, some people here have claimed a lot of fair hair among the Basques (though that wasn’t my impression in Basque country) and the most famous Basque of all: Bas de Lezo appears to be lighter-haired in his portraits.
    So couldn’t Galicia’s light hair genes be an Iberian inheritance rather than a diehard Germanic one? The Irish and Welsh are apparently Basque descendants and fair hair is far from uncommon among them – (though I wonder if that’s the legacy of rampaging English soldiers).

    Comment by Christian — February 13, 2009 @ 7:45 am

  342. christian, in galicia according to history books there weren’t never iberians; basques are said to be berebers who are reported to be blonder before the arabian invasion in the magreb.

    Comment by deam — February 13, 2009 @ 8:42 am

  343. Who do Galician history books say lived there before the Romans and the relatively few Germanic invaders? According to the other Spanish people I’ve known the Basques and Spanish are both ‘Iberians’, whose R1b genetic marker can be seen up the Atlantic seaboard right up to Norway. The Romans called these people ‘Aquitani’.
    I have no opinion on the matter, I was just interested. And I mean no offence.
    As far as I know the Berbers or Arabs never settled that far north in Spain..?

    Comment by Christian — February 13, 2009 @ 9:00 pm

  344. celts and before celts there are little and unclear information about oestrimians or ligurs whose origin is not clear. The arabs settled but briefly.

    Comment by deam — February 13, 2009 @ 10:00 pm

  345. Measuring the “blonde” levels of a nation is a very subjective measure. I know of no true statistical data collected on hair colour in the UK??. Since when has the population had to state hair colour in the census?! Most peoples opinions are therefore based on bias and stereotyping, based on scant personal evidence they have collated over their life. Media/television and travel are significant/influential determining factors in consolidating/establishing an individuals perception of nations charcteristics. However this is purely limited subjectivity. As an Englishman if I was for example living elsewhere I would not believe how blonde the UK really is based on what I saw from say the nationl football team line-up on TV! (based on 11 people representing their nation. However such things influence peoples opinion if they have never travelled throught that land themselves. So without true statistical data for every nation on earth we are left with nothing but personal subjectivity.

    Heralding from northern England and having travelled extensively throughout England and Europe, from life experience I’d say 1.5-2 in 5 people I see/meet in England is of natural fair/blonde hair colouring. So in a population of 50 million (England) that roughly equates to 15- 20 million fair/blonde haired people. Almost as many as the stereotypical blonde Scandinavian populations combined (if all the pop of such countries is blonde). But that is through sheer weight of population. Sweden with a population of 8 million, probably has more blondes on average than UK.

    Comment by Eric Hanlon — February 14, 2009 @ 3:30 pm

  346. Bas de lezo was known in his home at time of dinner.its much more known anther basques like san ignacio de loyola(jesuitas founder),aguirre(southamerica conquest) elcano and others.anyway i think basques there are less fair than other spaniards becouse they are pure iberians,without mixed with celtics,germans,arabs,romans,greeks etc

    Comment by leones — February 15, 2009 @ 9:37 am

  347. to eric,crhristian,mark or who want help me:
    what cityes or areas recomended me near to stansted in march apart london for a three days.i’m 43.i have never been in england.thanks.

    Comment by leones — February 15, 2009 @ 9:51 am

  348. Hi Leones. London’s actually many different cities rolled into one. When I lived there (eight years ago now) I liked Camden, Greenwich and the newly developing Docklands. If you want to see the ‘real England’ away from London’s crowds and pollution, then Oxford and Brighton are a short train ride away, you can see some countryside.

    Comment by Christian — February 19, 2009 @ 12:57 pm

  349. thanks christian.finally i are going to travel alone to the center london without rent car.i booked in a cheap hotel near rusell square.i have only three days.two km to camden,i will look for grenwich and docklands.i hope visit oxford and brighton with friend or my wife in other travel.thank you very much.

    Comment by leones — February 20, 2009 @ 3:31 am

  350. to cristian 341:
    i dont know the genetic relation between basques and welsh-irish but i saw mallorca area called “santa ponsa”where holiday people are all irish and in my opinion the features basques are totally different to features irish.basques are darker hair,less light eyes,less gentle face etc than irish.
    on the other hand in coria del rio(seville)there are descendents a ship samurai japanese came four hundred years ago.there are 600 descendents people with surname “japon”.the most famous was the first division spanish league referee called two surname “japon sevilla”.too other people have mother,grandfather and relatives with surname “japon” there.

    Comment by leones — February 20, 2009 @ 6:59 pm

  351. To the meatheads complaining about inaccuracies in the maps due to post WWII border shifts immigration and what not, I say, please purchase a brain! For Pete’s sake take into consideration that the maps are based on a study from 1965 and because of among other things political correctness due to Europe’s nasty past, no qualified research has been done on the subject. We just have to make do with what we have don’t we, and I do consider the work of Beals & Hoijer a more reliable source than ethnocentric hogwash from Nazi sympathizers such as Bertil Lundman, Hans Günther and Herman Lundborg.

    Comment by Infidel — February 21, 2009 @ 10:26 pm

  352. The Basques are Basques..iberians were in the south and east of spain.

    Comment by Spain the jewel of the mediterranean — March 24, 2009 @ 11:23 am

  353. In Iberia – Galicia and North Portugal has the more number of blondes.
    But in majour spaniards and portuguese are white meditereneans.
    Respect to all our european brothers.

    Comment by Portugal_NN — March 24, 2009 @ 2:57 pm

  354. People from Britain are often not blonde, the women there use peroxide to be blonde.
    The true northern europeans are Swedish, Norwegians,danish, dutch, north-german,icelandic, finnish, estonian, lithuanian ,latvian,and norwestern-russian people which happens to be naturally blonde in majority. Natural blondes in uk? hahah what a joke, they often dye it…

    Comment by Mark — March 26, 2009 @ 6:51 am

  355. i forgot to add people from belarus as true northern europeans

    Comment by Mark — March 26, 2009 @ 6:52 am

  356. I’m form southern Poland (darkest part of that country) and what i have observed is that blondes/brunettes are split 50/50, but when it comes to eye color, it is predominately blue.
    Research has shown that 65-70% of Poles are blond and blue-eyed. Only 5% are brown eyed and black haired. Only 35% of Germans are blond and blue-eyed. Various surveys done on army recruits have shown that
    1. scandinavians are the lightest, 2. followed by Baltic peoples, the Dutch and Frisians
    3. followed by Poles, north-west Russians, and western Ukrainians
    Darkest regions of Poland are as light as the lightest regions of Germany. In the old Polish corridor and Prussia Poles were lighter than Germans. Take that Hitler!

    Comment by Peter — March 27, 2009 @ 12:28 am

  357. to 352 “the basques are basques” and you are the biggest idiot.
    the basques are the only pure iberians in fact¿do you know where is iberia?you need open some book.

    Comment by leones — March 27, 2009 @ 11:06 am

  358. mark .i dont think you know english people, of course there are natural blondes in england.i have a old glasses that you need urgently.

    Comment by luciano pavrotti — March 27, 2009 @ 11:25 pm

  359. Peter i think you never have been in northern germany.. they are very blond there.

    Comment by Mark — March 28, 2009 @ 11:08 pm

  360. i have been in uk and most people i saw around there have some kind of brown and dark brown hair. Blond hair is not so frequent there as i though before.
    I would say i see definitely more blondes at home (germany).

    Comment by Lisa — March 29, 2009 @ 12:42 am

  361. With England it’s definitely regional. There’s plenty of fair hair in some areas. The London area obviously doesn’t count: if you see a white person in London they are at least as likely as not to be a foreigner. And those born in London (that I’ve known) tend to have fascinating moxed pedigrees (Mark you’d be surprised how many southern English have recent German ancestry – you’d approve if you were willing.
    As for bleach-blondes – well I’m positive there are more here in Scandinavia than there are in the UK (thankfully mostly women). I would estimate at least a third to half of the blonde women I know here are not entirely telling the truth;)

    Comment by Christian — March 29, 2009 @ 7:06 pm

  362. I recently commented on the light-eye map so I guess I may as well take a stab at the blonde map too LOL.

    First of all, there’s plenty of regional variation within each European country. Secondly, everyone’s experience is different depending on where they’ve traveled, the people from a given ethnic group they’ve met, etc. For example, a plurality of German-Americans are supposedly of northern German ancestry (which has more blond blue-eyed people). Many of these settled in places like central PA and the Midwest (i.e. Wisconsin, Minnesota, Dakotas, etc.). Hence, by looking at the folks in northern Germany and/or their descendants, one would expect that this is how Germans look. But upon traveling to Bavaria, for example, one would think that brown hair is the norm.

    That said, from my experience as an American, most people of German ancestry who I’ve seen (100% German descendants) and/or from Germany tend to have anything from light blond to dark brown hair, with the average probably being light brownish. As for eye color, many with light eyes and many others with hazel or brown eyes.

    I have to say that with respect to Brits, it also varies considerably depending on the region. Northern and eastern England are known for having been settled largely by Anglo-Saxons and Vikings (from northern Germany/Scandinavia). Therefore, I’d say it’s logical to say that despite what the map says, people from those areas of Britain and N. Germans/Scandinavians are probably quite similar in percentage of blondness/light eyes since they come largely from the same gene pool. However, Celtic and other earlier admixture in Brits probably accounts for the somewhat larger percentage of darker-haired people for an island so far north. Despite the dark hair though, Brits (incl. Irish) are almost always uniformly paler/ruddier than continental Northern Europeans like the Germans and Scandinavians, though naturally exceptions abound.

    As for Southern Europeans, dark brown hair is the norm in Iberia, Italy, and Greece. I can’t speak for Greece or Iberia, but with respect to Italy (having been there, being of mostly Italian ancestry, and having known many Italians), there is more variation between the different regions. Although dark brown is the dominant hair color throughout the country, dark blond/lighter brown shades are quite visible in places like Lombardy, Veneto, Piedmont, and the Po Valley. Such people are hardly “blond” as many understand the term, but their hair is comparatively light and they wouldn’t look out of place at all in Central Europe or France.

    A visit to northern Italy would undoubtedly shatter the stereotype of the swarthy Mediterranean Italian. Northern Italians have a mixed ancestry of Gallic Celts of the Po Valley (who predated the Romans and would’ve looked like today’s Frenchmen/Central Europeans who also share that ancestry), Germanic Lombards/Goths, Romans, and other groups.

    Even in southernmost Italy, where the typical Mediterranean look is more common (keep in mind that most Italian-Americans are of southern origin), you may still see people with lighter hair.

    I’ve never visited the heel of Apulia (the region the map claims as blonder), but it is indeed true that the Normans and Lombards established a notable presence there during the Middle Ages. Although their numbers were likely small, they may have “spread their seed” quite far so to speak, as most were knights and warriors who would’ve likely sired many children. In this way they may have influenced the gene pool in a way far beyond their relative numbers.

    This is speculation and assuming the map is correct in the first place, but I do know that in Palermo, Sicily (another central domain of the Norman kingdom of 11th-12th century southern Italy), there are also quite a few lighter-haired and/or lighter-eyed individuals among the local population.

    Maybe someone may disagree, but I feel that Greeks are generally the most brunet of all Europeans when looking at absolute numbers. Whether or not the Ottoman Turks made a significant contribution to the modern Greek gene pool is open to debate for many people, but I do think that there was some impact, although not nearly to the extent that some people believe.

    However, even if Greeks are the darkest, it would also have much to do with the fact that Greece never received a large influx of Northern/Central Europeans into its territory over the centuries, combined with the fact that most of Greece is very southern in its location. The ancient Greeks were also depicted as being predominantly dark, and I certainly believe that today’s Greeks have a strong link with the ancients despite what some may say. Even southern Italians have some Greek ancestry from ancient and also Byzantine times. Maybe some Greeks on here would like to enlighten me on this subject.

    In any event, I find this stuff fascinating and I certainly meant no harm to anyone.

    Comment by ANA — March 30, 2009 @ 5:55 am

  363. ANA.. There was a tv programm who took a DNA test to british people from different parts of the isles and the conclusion was one: The main genetic component found among the isles was native briton, of pre-celtic and pre-germanic origins even in the east anglian samples. I don’t know what you think about that but every time in the netherlands i can recognize a british people as they tend to be shorter and more brown haired in average than the dutch, and obvilius with features that most dutch people coul see as foreign since they lack of the “northern germanic” looks that most dutch and northern germans have.

    how tall is average british male? and female? i think around 176cm and 163cm. average dutch male and female are 185cm and 172cm.
    So you cant say british look the same than continental germanics which is too far from the reality

    Comment by Mark — March 30, 2009 @ 3:13 pm

  364. Mark, I do agree with you that on average, Brits are indeed darker than Scandinavians, N. Germans, and the Dutch. However, I strongly maintain that there is a considerable degree of overlap between the two. Furthermore, many Dutch and others have brownish hair, it’s not all blond there either. I’ve personally spoken with people of England who state that many people from the north and east have stereotypically Germanic looks. One woman (herself from the north) told me about how many people from that area have names of ultimate Scandinavian origin and it was settled heavily by the Danes.

    Comment by ANA — March 31, 2009 @ 9:14 pm

  365. The jury is out on the genetic view of the British isles, while tests some say ‘total germanic population replacement’, others say ‘almost all celtic/indigenous’ (which the brits themselves seem to like. There is obviously something up here if the same science can come up with such totally contradictory results. Personally I think the reality lies somewhere in the middle. I recently tried to read Oppenheimer, the most commonly quoted advocates of the ‘all indigenous’ view, and found him very suspect and contradictory.

    Comment by Christian — April 1, 2009 @ 11:36 am

  366. As for height – it isn’t the ‘average’ Dutch male that’s 184, it’s the latest generation. You get the same thing here in Denmark where it seems 20 yr-olds have all gained 5 cms on their dads amd maternal grand-fathers. I have no idea what could be the reason: diets have gotten worse rather than better.
    And Mark I would say your height figures for the Brits are rather out of date. I’m an ok 1.82 and I’ve never felt unusually tall in England. You’re right about the distinctiveness of classic Dutch features – from Germans and Scandinavians too.

    Comment by Christian — April 1, 2009 @ 11:53 am

  367. ^I agree Christian. I’ve seen conflicting results on Brits (primarily the English specifically), but I’d say judging from my personal experience with them, it depends largely on the region, and many look somewhat intermediate between the indigenous (Celtic/pre-Celtic) and Germanic groups.

    I also personally think that post-WWII, many Brits would prefer not to associate themselves with anything German or Germanic, hence a desire to turn greater focus to their Celtic roots. Just my opinion that’s all.

    Prior to WWI as a matter of fact, the English always emphasized their Anglo-Saxon heritage in order to distinguish themselves from the Scots, Irish, and Welsh. The political nature of this debate makes me simply think that the English are somewhere in the middle, and that there is of course regional variation.

    Comment by ANA — April 1, 2009 @ 7:24 pm

  368. “almagro and verdasco are by far the most exotic lookin spanish tennis players (they look moroccan or algerian), nadal is just tanned nothing more and his hair isnt as dark like some asian person”

    Yes I agree here. Almagro to me actually looks Levantine (i.e. Lebanese, Turkish, etc.), but in any event he’s one of the more exotic-looking Spaniards I’ve seen. The typical average Spaniard is not as eastern Mediterranean-looking.

    Even Antonio Banderas (who everyone loves to talk about as an example of a “dark” Spaniard) is not that dark. In fact, when not tanned, he’s really pretty pale. This is the case for the normal Southern European as a matter of fact. The untanned complexion is often as pale as any other European (save the whitest Brits/Irish who have the “Celtic” skin type).

    Spanish golfers Sergio Garcia and Miguel Angel Jimenez could easily pass for Brits or Frenchmen (and possibly German in the case of Jimenez). Jose Maria Olazabal on the other hand could pass for Levantine or Jewish IMO due to his brunet coloring and pronounced facial features.

    As for tennis player Rafael Nadal, he could easily be French or N. Italian.

    One very good example of a common Iberian look is actor Andy Garcia, who could also easily be Italian.

    This kind of variation is most common in the Mediterranean region because it’s been such a melting pot for thousands of years. Today’s Southern Europeans in particular are essentially amalgamated populations of primarily “indigenous” Southern European (Paleolithic/Neolithic populations) with more recent Northern/Central European and Levantine/North African admixture.

    Comment by ANA — April 2, 2009 @ 5:31 am

  369. i agree that this map seem poorly developed. There is no way of brits being as blond as us. LOL
    Germany and holland got more of that than brits. also how can be balcanians be as blonde as northern germans LOL. and northern spain in the same category of flanders LOL

    So southern italians are as blonde as frisians. that seems a quite realiable source (whatever) LOL

    Comment by Magnus — April 3, 2009 @ 4:17 am

  370. ^Agree here, but Brits still have a substantial number from my experience. Anglo-Saxon and Viking/Danish ancestors would mostly explain this. It’s also likely that some of the prior Celtic inhabitants were blond as well, though they were mostly brown-haired or red-haired, hence a much higher proportion of darker hair and redheads in the more historically Celtic populations of the British Isles. The English specifically have substantial Germanic admixture, I don’t care what a few genetic studies indicate (that likely have an agenda). Other studies have in contrast shown the English as grouping strongly with the Danes. They’re obviously intermediate between their neighbors and groups such as the Danes.

    The English are blonder than the Scots, Irish, and Welsh on average, but not quite as blond as most N. Germans, Dutch, or Danes.

    Comment by ANA — April 3, 2009 @ 5:40 pm

  371. Some claim, the genetic clustering of the English and the eastern Scots with North-West Europe could go right back to the bronze age – before the word ‘Germanic’ ever existed. Having said that I think the total replacement of the indigenous languages by English, right down to placenames in the remotest areas, must indicate a massive population movement from accross the channel (as much as some Brits hate the idea, like the Japanese and their Korean connection) And yes, there certainly is an agenda with some geneticists-I saw one claiming the Brit gene pool is untouched since the ice age – considering well-attested historic immigration of Scandinavians, Flemings, Hugenots etc, that’s just impossible.

    Comment by Christian — April 6, 2009 @ 6:55 am

  372. From where is this map. It looks like sucked from finger. Realy russians, exept southern ones are very blond, as blond as scandinavians. And latvians have a bit darker than russians.

    Comment by Asdam — April 6, 2009 @ 1:15 pm

  373. @Christian:

    I agree my friend. People have been moving around since time immemorial. The genetic compositions of modern populations, while certainly similar and partially descended from people living there say, 2,000 years ago, have been altered somewhat since those times through immigration, assimilation, and amalgamation.

    To say that Brits have been untouched since the days of the Ice Age is ludicrous. There are historical records of groups such as Anglo-Saxons and Danish Vikings moving to Britain in large numbers. Many surnames in certain parts of England are of Scandinavian origin. I also find it interesting that very few Celtic words exist in the English language. Although this doesn’t necessarily indicate a total replacement, it certainly lends further credence to the idea that there was substantial immigration from continental Europe and that many of the Celts who stuck around were just assimilated into the new groups.

    Europe and the Mediterranean world in particular have long been subject to internal and external migrations and invasions, hence I think it’s fair to say from a purely objective standpoint that the genetic composition of today’s populations in those areas are considerably different than how it was 2,000+ years ago. The Dark Ages and Middle Ages were especially a period of constant migration/invasion of various peoples into and around those regions.

    During those periods, you had the great migration of Germanic peoples all across continental Europe, Huns, Slavs, Avars, Magyars, Saracens/Moors, Normans, Turks, and other groups coming and going. Wherever they went and settled, they assimilated into and amalgamated with the preexisting populations. Even the extensive centuries-long trans-Saharan slave trade in the Arab world resulted in the absorption of sub-Saharan genes into local populations, especially on the female side as female slaves were preferred.

    Comment by ANA — April 6, 2009 @ 7:18 pm

  374. Germans are blond, brits are dark Nuff said

    Comment by Mark — April 7, 2009 @ 3:44 pm

  375. danes are blond, dutch are blond, swedes are blond, Finns are blond, estonians are blond, lithuanians are blond, latvians are blond, northern russians are blond, belarusians are blond, northern germans are blond, many poles are blond. Brits are dark, dark hair , dark eyes, swarthy.

    Comment by Mark — April 7, 2009 @ 3:47 pm

  376. ok mark,we understand you mean,you repeat and repeat,but ANA,Cristian and I explained our reasons why we known european people and where we are.in my case specially because i had been living several years in mallorca,i know well spain,i travel to kosovo etc.
    but you dont explain where you are,why you known people from the whole world and your obsession for the brits are dark.i think you are one alien or strange person from out europe and you have shame for your country.
    you dont have courage to tell the true despite you write many post here.

    Comment by leones — April 7, 2009 @ 4:32 pm

  377. i will back to london christian.i hope travel as soon as posible.i need more three days there.maybe in may.
    its interesting the discussion if english people prefer to have ancestors celts or germanics.
    in my opinion english are different and special due the gene celt.
    german ,dutch,scaninavian baltic etc are normal or plane people.
    english people and brits in general are different in behavoir and character against another north european and of course mediterranean people

    Comment by leones — April 7, 2009 @ 5:05 pm

  378. to leones…im finn and you are a swarthy balcanian

    Comment by Mark — April 7, 2009 @ 5:11 pm

  379. sorry,not plane,plain.

    Comment by leones — April 7, 2009 @ 5:11 pm

  380. i,m swarthy spaniard from leon,thanks,

    Comment by leones — April 7, 2009 @ 5:16 pm

  381. Ohh now i understand your obssesion with “whiteness” and “blondeness” since you are spaniard. And always spaniards and italians obssesed with blondes which are very rare in their homelands ;)

    Comment by Mark — April 7, 2009 @ 5:19 pm

  382. ^Italians and Spaniards obsessed with blondes or being blond? As an Italian-American, to be quite honest with you I’ve always liked being somewhat different from the typical white American of northern/western European extraction. I have nothing against anyone either, as most of my friends are of these backgrounds, but I’m just proud to be who I am.

    What the Italians and Spaniards here are simply saying is that there are still blond people in these ethnicities, which is true, even if most of us have brown or black hair (mostly dark brown to be precise).

    I can also understand if Spaniards get a little irritated when people fail to understand the differences between Spaniards and Latin Americans, thinking they all look the same. Many people (unfortunately too many Americans in particular) are shockingly ignorant when it comes to various ethnicities. Some of you wouldn’t believe some of the things I’ve heard.

    Here’s one hilarious story for you guys: One time, I was working a concession stand late at night with a darker-skinned Korean-American co-worker. He goes in the back to get some popcorn for the customer we’re waiting on. The moment he went back, he says to me, “Oh my God! It’s one of those guys who blew up the plane!” (This is shortly after 9/11 and he actually thought the Korean-American was Arab). Half of the assaults that took place after 9/11 were actually of South Asians and/or Latin Americans, most of whom don’t look very much like Middle Easterners at all. I could go on and on, but I’ll stop here lol.

    Comment by ANA — April 7, 2009 @ 6:04 pm

  383. i always say where i am but not you.i dont understand you mark,maybe you are more obsessed than me with witheness because you write here more than nobody.
    its true that i like europe in general.i know some disaster countrys like morocco that im not interested in,i prefer europe,specially britain where you repeat that blonds not exist.
    on the other i have many relatives with blond hair.
    for your information in 1985 there are a disco in mallorca called “la sirena” plenty of finns that i knew.now this area is ruined.greetings

    Comment by leones — April 7, 2009 @ 7:52 pm

  384. ^Always wanted to visit Spain Leones. Been to Italy, my next stop is Spain if I get to Europe again. After that probably Britain, France, and/or Greece.

    But I hear that Barcelona is a really awesome city with much to do. Ditto for Marbella and the various Mediterranean resort towns/cities.

    Comment by ANA — April 8, 2009 @ 12:47 am

  385. Mark, this is just getting weird. Swarthy is the last word anyone would ever use for Brits (pale, to white as a sheet would describe it more) Scandinavians generally have ruddier skin. And nowhere in Europe is the population more than 40% blond (as in truly blond). Where are you from anywhere? you keep dodging the question. You’re clearly not from Europe. You’ve mentioned Argentina…(that might explain you’re obvious British prejudice)…?

    Comment by Christian — April 8, 2009 @ 7:44 am

  386. ^Hell most southern Europeans really aren’t that “swarthy” either, let alone Brits! Brits and Irish are probably on average the palest people in the world.

    Besides, “swarthy” is such a relative term. I might appear somewhat swarthy to a northern European, but anywhere outside of Europe or in countries with predominantly European-descended majorities (i.e. U.S., Canada, Argentina, Australia, etc.), I’m a white boy.

    If southern Europeans are so darn swarthy, why did the Aztecs of Mexico describe the Spanish conquistadores as having very white skin? When Marco Polo visited China and the Mongol Empire, he and his companions were described as being “hairy white barbarians.” This stuff is all relative.

    Comment by ANA — April 8, 2009 @ 3:49 pm

  387. What i said about brits being never blond was a parody, of course there are blonde people in britain , but generally they arent as homogeneus as othern northern europeans since they are not direct descendants of native northern europeans, they are basically a mix of northern european invasors and native britons , that explains why they look often not so northern european in the same sense of northern germans, dutch, danes..etc

    Comment by Mark — April 8, 2009 @ 6:01 pm

  388. 40%? are you crazy? all depends at which age the sample is taken.
    If you go to kinder garden in northern europe (90% or higher) of children are blonde.
    Not the case of britain i googled kindergarden there and likely half of the kindergarden class had brown or black hair and they had british features.

    same if u go about teenagers or young adults from 15-25
    most people in northern europe is definitely blond still at those ages, being the most common hair color in men dark blonde and in women somewhat like medium blonde.
    In britain by those age i doubt most than 25% of people are still blonde (im including dark blonde).

    And again now this map never was talking about blonde hair but (light hair) which includes light brown hair. Then we go for the case most northern european brunnetes have somewhat rat colored hair which is called scandinavia. its not blonde or brunette but once they go to southern european nations as france or italy they are definitely called blond over there, so all of that is relative.
    If we go by international standards then even most northern european brunettes would be consideres blond. But they wouldnt consider themselves blonde in their own countries.

    Comment by Mark — April 8, 2009 @ 6:12 pm

  389. ^Not to nitpick, but I don’t think I’d call the French a primarily southern European nation, they’re more of a mix, and it’s really only southern France where they look Mediterranean. Those from the northern and central parts are more central European-looking on average, and some even on the northern side. The typical Frenchman is closest to a S. German, Swiss, or N. Italian in terms of looks.

    Comment by ANA — April 8, 2009 @ 7:36 pm

  390. you are right ANA i agree with you
    most french (except southern ones) are often more central european looking than southern european.
    but i woulndt say central france is as light as southern germany even if they dont look mediterranean like italians or spaniards in average. Northern italy isnt central europe but rather somewhat betwe.en southern and central europe in terms of population

    Comment by Mark — April 8, 2009 @ 7:55 pm

  391. I hope you enjoy if come to spain.about BCN there are enough information for you.Marbella is nice and all “costa del sol” have many brits and europeans that live all year along 100 km coast.since malaga to estepona.if you want to see nice landscape and green mountains you can come to north in aturias where i live now.greetings

    Comment by leones — April 9, 2009 @ 5:31 pm

  392. mark say not only brit are dark hair,too dark eyes when people that know brits(not only english)know they are about 80 or 90 per cent light eyes.
    to add when i walked in mallorca between germans i think passed more unnoticed that between brits due to pale skin brits(not all spaniard look like antonio banderas).
    in the kindergarden too i was blond,i have pictures but with years dark brown.its normal.too in ceuta(north-north africa) i see morocaan kids with brown hair.
    mark only say you are finn under pressure after many time¿why?.speak about finns everybody know.do you know litmanen?
    your character look like argentine or southamerican,sorry if its not correct.

    Comment by leones — April 9, 2009 @ 6:15 pm

  393. ^Several of my friends have been to Spain and they had a great time. I imagine the cultural diversity between each region is pretty cool too. Galicia/Asturias on one hand and Andalucia on the other is a good example. Italy is much the same way as one goes from the wealthier “hustle bustle” areas of Lombardy or the Po Valley in the north and then ventures down to the laid-back Mediterranean lifestyle of Sicily, where life is simpler. It’s like night and day in some aspects.

    Comment by Curious guy — April 9, 2009 @ 8:09 pm

  394. Ok, for me blond hair has only ever meant exactly that: white to middle yellow colored hair. It’s what the term means in northern European and Anglo-Saxon countries. So Mark 40% (without the hair bleach alot of people, namely girls, in this part of the world use) is very realistic. As is your estimate of 20% blond(-ish) in Britain. Brown hair is called brown in North Europe, Anglo-USA, Canada, Australia, NZ etc. And kids’ hair colour is completely irrelevant. Non-white kids often have fair hair as children. I know black-haired white people who started life as almost albino. You must live in a very dark-haired population if you think children’s hair matters at all.

    Comment by Christian — April 11, 2009 @ 7:28 pm

  395. I said im Finn , seems you don’t read well.
    Check this pictures:

    http://www.geocities.com/littlednaprojec...

    So here are what Irish guys look like –
    http://munster.gaa.ie/images/2007_CorkU2...

    And here are some Scots -
    http://www.sportsunion.dundee.ac.uk/shin...

    Here are two teams from the south east of England -
    http://www.readinghockeyclub.org.uk/asse...

    And two teams from the North of England-
    http://www.dur.ac.uk/StChads/Rugby/seven...
    http://bp1.blogger.com/_tttXgU2vr8E/SB9G...

    Look how 75% if not more of all the british and irish have dark hair… and the dominant hair color is dark brown,, if you dont want to open your eyes then i don’t give a damn but even my british friends get surprised how blonde people is every time they come to scandinavia or northern continental europe. they get amazed by the northern germanic looks which is rather uncommon in britain (even england).

    Comment by Mark — April 11, 2009 @ 9:15 pm

  396. i just tell the truth

    you just dont wanna face the truth most of blondes from america,canada, australia,nz and uk are fake. They dont look like scandinavians or northern germanics i have been in all those countries, and im finn

    Comment by Mark — April 12, 2009 @ 2:58 am

  397. Actually the American Midwest has many people of Germanic descent, especially N. German and Scandinavian. So you do see plenty of people in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, etc. who look quite Germanic (i.e. blond and blue-eyed). White Americans in the Southeast are heavily of British descent with some German, French, and others thrown in. In the West it’s mainly a mixture of Anglo-Irish and Germanic with a smattering of other groups, and the Northeast is by far the most diverse. Italians, Eastern Europeans, Jews, and others are all well-represented in addition to the primarily Anglo-Irish/Germanic core of white Americans.

    Comment by ANA — April 12, 2009 @ 8:06 pm

  398. you are right ANNA midwest americans are often heavily northern european by descent. MOrmons in Utah are also.

    Comment by Mark — April 13, 2009 @ 12:35 am

  399. White Americans in general are primarily of Northern and Western European descent. British, Irish, and German ancestries alone are approximately 40-45% of the entire U.S. population. White Americans taken together are about 65% of the U.S. population. The other white Americans are a mixture of Italian, Slavic, Jewish, Scandinavian, French, and other groups.

    Plus keep in mind that the mixed European ancestry of most white Americans nowadays makes it difficult to determine the exact percentages of each group. Because of this, the numbers always vary. I know people who are a mixture of 6 or 7 different European ethnicities (often with a little Native American thrown in), so anymore most white Americans just see themselves as “white” and nothing else.

    That said, based on the above information, I’d say the average white American appearance is light/medium brown hair, light or hazel eyes, fair skin, and facial features that are within the Anglo-Irish/Germanic range. Larger builds are also more common, but frankly this is also because of dieting as well unfortunately.

    Comment by ANA — April 13, 2009 @ 4:19 am

  400. To Mark… I definitely agree with you..
    I have been in britain, i thought they were a germanic looking people, but i got surprised natural blonde hair is rare over there. Girls there often lie about their natural hair color and pretend to be blonde. haha thats funny cause where im from actually (northern germany) i see more people darkening their hair than dying it blonde , since most women i know around here are blonde (natural) and real black hair over here is kinda rare

    Comment by Famke — April 15, 2009 @ 2:14 am

  401. Mark- you’re Finnish, got it, sorry didn’t quite understand you’re phrasing. I’ve actually just been in Helsinki for work. i know what Irish, English etc look like, and I’ve said I would put blondness at 20% tops, so we don’t disagree on that. ‘Germanic’ is at best a language group – i think Scandinavians and north germans look quite distinct from one another, even Danes from the German-speaking border regions look different to the rest. And, once again,hair bleach is popular with women across northern Europe, I don’t know why you single out Brits, Americans etc.

    But how does it work with Finns? Are the black-haired people more likely to be of Sami descent? Almost everyone in my company’s Helsinki office is dark-haired.Strangely one is the image of Gabriel Byrne.

    Comment by Christian — April 16, 2009 @ 1:15 pm

  402. I should add i agree with you that Finns are at least as blond as Scandinavians, even when you subtract the less than entirely natural blonds ;)

    Comment by Christian — April 16, 2009 @ 1:43 pm

  403. To Christian

    The component is most notorius when you travel along northern finland and some people may have mixed sami ancestry, those people may not only have very dark hair but you can see in their features their pseudo-asiatic features which happen to appear very infantilized in eyes of another people. Yes i might agree with you , every ethnicity look different..the danes is closer to dutch than they are to us fins. we in western finland seem closer to sweden than let say to iceland, all of that is more likely to be a regional diversity. There are many swedes over finland, which are called fennoswedes, even if they live in our land they identify mostly with sweden..not to talk about the million of finns living in sweden today.

    Comment by Mark — April 17, 2009 @ 4:54 am

  404. Why should we really care about people’s hair colour so much?

    It’s always going to end up grey anyway!!!!!!!!

    Comment by sam — April 17, 2009 @ 5:55 am

  405. Going grey’s the good outcome. Looking at the receding hairlines of some of my relatives I’m clinging to the hope I’ll be a silver fox rather than a baldy. I hope the generation-skipping theory applies…

    Comment by Christian — April 17, 2009 @ 9:38 am

  406. Yeah I always wondered, what exactly is the genetic contribution of the Lapps (Sami) to the Finnish population? I’ve also seen many Russians who are fair and blond but yet at the same time have somewhat Asian-looking features (i.e. oblique eyes, high cheekbones, etc.). Considering their location and historical contacts with peoples of the steppe and Central Asia, I think it’s fair to say that ethnic Russians are not totally Slavic but, like many ethnic groups, have ancestors from a variety of distinct ancient populations.

    Comment by ANA — April 18, 2009 @ 4:38 am

  407. I’ve never seen a map that shows the distribution of (naturally – not dyed!) red hair but I think that would be fascinating as red is the rarest fully distinct hair colour on earth. When will a scientist do this? Before we redheads disappear, I hope.

    Comment by Naughtychimp — April 28, 2009 @ 2:47 am

  408. ireland and united kingdom are the most number of red hair probably due celt component,of course countryes with this origin too like australia and new zeeland.
    the skin and hair this people smell and taste stronger that blondes and brunettes(white people)

    Comment by leones — April 29, 2009 @ 10:00 am

  409. scotland is the most red-haired nation in the world, i think 13% of scots have naturally red hair and about 40% of them carry the gene, sadly red hair probably will dissapear since it never have been the majority anywhere, it just reach the double digits in scotland and ireland ( 13% and 10% respectively) in all other contries , even countries with very high blondism incidence such as northern european and baltic nations red hair always is in the single digits. I have seen also many red heads in Iceland and Norway. Netherlands, Denmark, Finland and baltic states, although all those countries have a high incidence of blonde hair red hair is quite uncommon over there. In sweden red hair red hair seems a bit more common than in denmark or finland but lesser common than in norway. In germany the more celtic south of germany have a much higher incidence of red hair than the northern region that happens to be blonder but at the same time have less red heads.

    I heard redheads in the uk are teased ..thats quite bad :(

    Comment by Mark — April 30, 2009 @ 3:25 am

  410. thank you

    Comment by Tony — May 4, 2009 @ 3:18 am

  411. lenin and vincent van gogh had red hair,now i can remember several actress:nicole kidman(with ireland ancestors),kirsten dunst,(is a pity now not natural blond both)julianne moore,etc,about men david caruso,paul shooles.

    Comment by leones — May 9, 2009 @ 5:02 pm

  412. ^Heh yeah, David Caruso. Interesting that he’s half Italian as he looks far more stereotypically Irish than most full-blooded Irish people lol. That’s interesting.

    Comment by ANA — May 10, 2009 @ 8:11 am

  413. the blonds are a race than another white people. they all come from nothern europe they are all fitter and have less diseases than brunette gypsies or dark haired jews they are all hitlers race nordic pure aryans strong and alot of them are found in places like the germanic/celts/slavic/others areas. i dont get it why do brunettes call themselves aryans when most of brunettes i see look weird they grow the most diseases because they are not nordic

    Comment by tlt — May 13, 2009 @ 9:55 am

  414. tlt,your english is worst than mine i think.
    countryes with blonde people had had the biggest importance in the last 500 years in the world.the years of industry revolution,democracy,technology,developped medicine etc,to add this people are more work people,tiny and wealth,worried about cleanig houses and bodys etc.
    i admire colon ,cook ,bell,marconi,franklin,shakespeare,admusen,da vinci,elizabeth I,catholics kings,pilgrims in america,mercedes,bmw etc etc

    Comment by leones — May 13, 2009 @ 3:11 pm

  415. In afganistan there are blondes who suffer hunger, not all blondes live like kings(accept the expression)and have developed countries.

    Comment by deam — May 14, 2009 @ 12:44 pm

  416. maybe could be interesting if you stayed in afganistan tell us what problems there are there,what look like people,what influence have the religion in people etc.i prefer this than go to work there or go there in holidays.greetings.

    Comment by leones — May 14, 2009 @ 6:19 pm

  417. those english are wogs compared to germans…they have never been that blond, otherwise there wouldnt be people like george best or gordon banks in their football teams. Most brits look like beatles and artic monkeys.

    Comment by Peter_the_north — May 14, 2009 @ 6:24 pm

  418. another weird guy that hate england.are yu argentine or german that fight in WW2 maybe?.
    your exemples are very old,maybe you too.
    compare david beckham and oliver khan.who look like artic monkey?

    Comment by leones — May 15, 2009 @ 7:46 am

  419. merci

    Comment by aspicco . — May 17, 2009 @ 6:25 am

  420. leones accept it britons are dark, take a travel to UK, by ryanair or vueling is quite cheat, you will be surprised how many darkier are over there(and im not talking about foreigners)

    Comment by Peter_the_North — May 21, 2009 @ 2:41 am

  421. i travelled to london but london is not a good example becouse there are many ireland,polland and several whites people from another countryes(of course too black people,hindu etc).i hope travell differents villages in the future to england.but if you want know good well european people you have travel to mallorca,i lived three years there and all european countryes are represented there.
    for us the spaniards english is not dark hair,maybe you live in scandinavia and your point of view is different.

    Comment by leones — May 21, 2009 @ 1:42 pm

  422. I don’t have anything against the brits just that they look a bit different to us if u might ask (not so good looking), maybe my words sound too rude a (bit too much), if there is sombody i don’t like are the french, they are one of the less welcoming people i have been between, but that’s another stuff, The fact that maps like that are done sound stupid anyways cause there is not any reliable source for every province in europe, so all finally based on stereotypes like, spaniards are darker than european average but the celtic part a bit lighter so lets give to this region a lighter color than the rest of spain, quite subjetive way of reasoning, im sure that the person who created this map wasn’t even european but american, and he was quite obsessed with the concept of “whiteness” typical “”white”" american who labels everybody into a word and that even ignores that his real roots aren’t that caucasian. So the the map is invalid

    Comment by Peter_the_North — May 21, 2009 @ 4:44 pm

  423. Well I am from South Africa and am travelling around Europe. I saw a lot of blonds all over Norther Europe but I have to say I was amzed how Anglo – Saxon looking the Irish are……especially in Dublin and Cork……..Ireland is the cross roads of Europe I think. I saw very few Black haired Irish..most were light brown, blond or red haired….

    Comment by Munsterman — May 23, 2009 @ 2:34 am

  424. I once visited a small town in Denmark with a population of several thousand people. Everyone single person in that town had blond hair. From the Hotel manager, to the postman and even the garbage men/women. I only saw one person with red hair and she was a tourist from England.

    Comment by Tourist — May 28, 2009 @ 1:53 am

  425. in bishop`s stortford.a city between london and cambridge with 3000 inhabitants more or less the majority of people have blond hair and british features,the rest people light brown or brown hair.i state here two days ago.

    Comment by leones — May 31, 2009 @ 11:10 am

  426. what about spain leones? when i was there i didn’t see a single blonde person(native), thought light brown hair is not uncommon.

    Comment by Peter_the_north — June 2, 2009 @ 4:25 am

  427. you are right,there arent a single blonde personne here.

    Comment by leones — June 2, 2009 @ 8:29 am

  428. for example:a well known actor ralph fiennes have normal hair colour in england.then ralph is blonde or ligh brown to the majority of spaniards,but brown hair to the english or german people and i dont know to the scandinavian people.
    christian bale sure have dark hair to the scandinavian,english and german people,but brown to the spaniards.
    gudjohnsen is blonde too the scandinavians sure.gretings

    Comment by leones — June 4, 2009 @ 9:47 pm

  429. ciao a tutte . hair blonde woman call me paolod27@hotmail.com

    Comment by paolo — June 4, 2009 @ 9:49 pm

  430. im sorry paolo,all hair blonde woman are calling to the Berlusconi´s house.

    Comment by leones — June 6, 2009 @ 6:52 am

  431. Paolo you are so stupid !! and Berlusconi’s women have her hair dyed… they aren’t blond!!

    Comment by Beatriz — June 13, 2009 @ 9:33 pm

  432. British are not blonde

    There are no mass grave sites as you might expect–and yes, you WOULD find them after 1500 years, that’s NOTHING age-wise on the scale of things. I can name you mass battle grave sites from the first incursions of the Romans and even back to the neolithic when inhabitants of a causewayed camp were cut down in the hail of arrows.
    The best ‘evidence’ of open warfare comes from the writings of cloistered monks, not exactly in the thick of things themselves.
    Apparently london was evacuated in anticipation of the Saxon advances, but was trading again in 3 months.
    I believe there certainly was a large incursion of northern peoples, but it looks as if parts of England were actually quite empty at the time, possibly because of plague or famine.They just took the land and continued to do so, pushing the natives to the edges of the best land. I always though it pretty unlikely a max of 200,000 Saxons,angles and Jutes (and the figure was likely much lower) could annihilate a whole population of 3 MILLION. Certainly they were the ruling minority,however–just as the Normans were after 1066.
    As for the spread of English, well, i have a few theories. We don’t really know what language the natives of England were speaking at the time. Many were very Romanised–did they mostly speak Latin at this stage and not a celtic tongue? That could be a good explanation why english quickly became the language of communication as Latin is closer to english than Brythonic.Certainly it would be much more difficult for the Saxons to learn the celtic languages than the reverse.
    also there’s the matter of the belgae tribe who lived in england-they are considered celtc but may have spoken a Germanic language–hence there may have been people speaking a form of early English in England before the Saxons came! You will note there are no celtic language inscriptions found anywhere in England outside of Cornwall.
    Dna testing has also shown that the majority of the English are actually descended from prehistoric peoples. And yes, they came mainly from Iberia. when they first arrived over 9000 years ago they were literally able to walk up the western seaboard and across to Cornwall! Major dna studies have shown this link clearly.distance is NOT a factor,as one previous poster seemed to think, and actually northern Spain is relatively close to Britain. Many migrations originated much further away than that–after all, ALL Europeans came out of the near and middle east at one time and gradually dispersed around the continent. The neolithic migrations that changed how we lived forever originated from Mesopotamia.
    English people also have more blood type O than Germans and Scandinavians (O is older than A),and many also have longer heads,of a type known,appropriately, as Mediterranean. The lower western half of England also has a high proportion of darker phenotypes-both brown hair and brown eyes run at at least 50%.
    So all in all, the Saxons were here, they imprinted their culture on the natives but they eventually ended up blending into the older stratum of the population,not destroying it.

    Comment by Mark — June 17, 2009 @ 12:52 am

  433. then,iberian people will wear skirt now.

    Comment by leones — June 19, 2009 @ 4:08 pm

  434. Muchas gracias

    Comment by sun — July 4, 2009 @ 7:23 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.