Strange Maps

December 17, 2007

220 - Russo-Japanese War Cartoons

Filed under: Uncategorized — strangemaps @

2002_6822_3cards_s1.jpg

This is interesting: these cartoons obviously are about the Russo-Japanese War of 1905. But since I’m offline while writing this, I can’t find out much more of the context. So let’s see what I can extrapolate.

First, the facts – as far as I know them. The by now rather obscure Russo-Japanese War of 1905 was a relatively minor, mainly naval conflict that nevertheless echoed around the world: it was the first time in modern history that a non-European nation defeated a European one.

Over the centuries, Russia had expanded from its heartland to the west of the Urals into Siberia, eventually reaching the Pacific shores of the Far East. At the turn of the 20th century, these sparsely populated parts to the north of China and Japan were also outside the orbit of these two empires, the former ancient but impotent, the latter only just emerging from centuries of self-imposed isolation.

What exactly caused the war I don’t remember, but it centred on Russia’s possession of Port Arthur, a coastal city somewhere in the vicinity of the Korean peninsula. Japan, swiftly modernising by copying various bits of European civilisation – up to the Prussian cut of its school uniforms – disputed Russia’s push into its backyard and used its brand spanking new European-style navy to inflict a defeat on the Russians.

This shock was felt first and foremost in Russia itself, where the defeat at the hands of the Japanese contributed to the failed revolution of 1905, a dress rehearsal for the communist takeover of 1917. These cartoons, obviously mocking the Russian defeat, were not made in Russia itself – understandably, as the Czars were wont to send people too critical of their rule on a one-way trip to Siberia.

  • The first cartoon is in French, and was tirée à 30 exemplaires (which is an extremely small figure for what should be a mass medium, one would think). It shows a bearded, booted Russian (a cossack, but possibly the Czar himself) lying on the ground asleep and overrun, Gulliver-like, by tiny soldiers marching up the Korean peninsula – Korea was a Japanese colony at the time, I think. The presumably Japanese war ships in the Sea of Japan (Mer du Japon) seem to underline the naval aspect of the Japanese victory. Two paper boats with a sailor each might symbolise European powers observing the Japanese victory. An English soldier on the left, probably at or near Hong Kong and another colonial standing behind a (the?) Chinese wall do the same.
  • The Gulliver-theme is repeated in the second cartoon, also French. I’m not sure what le petit poucet means. Port Arthur is mentioned by name. A group of tiny solders watch as one of their number attempts to de-boot the sleeping Russian. The implication is that Russia’s defeat is due to its unpreparedness.
  • The third cartoon shows a small pond in which a Japanese ship sinks a Russian one. The large, looming Russian is unable to hide his displeasure, while the smaller Japanese can’t hide his glee. Oh, what a surprise, reads the caption. No Gulliver theme here, but the Japanese figure is again a lot smaller than the European one.

Is this an indication of racism? One could think that by portraying ‘orientals’ as small and in large groups, this indicates that they are less ‘individual’, less ‘human’ than Europeans. Or maybe the smaller stature simply reflects the David-like character of the Japanese victory over the Russian Goliath.

I came across these cartoons a while ago, and can’t recall exactly where I found them.


35 Comments »

  1. Definitely an indication of contemporary racism, although rather benign compared to other images of the time that show Japanese as ravenous insects or barbarians.

    The war was minor in world-historical terms, but it demolished the Russian Navy - not a trivial thing! It put Japan “on the map” as a world power, and not just because of the naval action. They showed great superiority in the land battles too. And as you say, it seriously undermined the authority and credibility of the Tsar.

    Comment by lichanos — December 17, 2007 @

  2. [...] check out these political cartoons of the Russo-Japanese War of 1905, where the fate of Korea in the 20th century started its dark [...]

    Pingback by ZenKimchi » That Night Map — December 17, 2007 @

  3. “Le petit poucet” is a French fairy tale by Perrault.

    It is the tale of 7 children, the youngest named le petit poucet, who were abandoned by their parents in the forest during the famine times. Somewhere in the story, they need to evade a giant, and they steal the “bottes de sept lieues” from him (seven-league boots?)

    Comment by bk — December 17, 2007 @

  4. Port Arthur is now the Lushunkou district of Dalian. The Russians had leased it as their northernmost ice-free naval port. Arthur was a British Naval Officer whose ship anchored there some decades before. I visted Dalian recently but did not see Lushunkao as foreigners require a permit.

    Comment by Niel — December 17, 2007 @

  5. Just a small correction - the R-J war wasn’t a “mainly naval” conflict. That’s how we remember it because the final bit was the humiliation of the Russians at the Tsushima Straits, but there was very fierce ground fighting too, and a total of maybe 130,000 deaths.

    Comment by Minivet — December 17, 2007 @

  6. Don’t forget that England helped Japan in that war…

    And what’s wrong with small people? All people are equal and size doesn’t matter.

    Comment by Merkwuerdigich Liebe — December 17, 2007 @

  7. Port Arthur = modern-day Lushen, on the Liaodong Pennisula in China.

    I don’t think that the relative size of the figures shows racism–it simply reflcts the fact that before the war, Russia was accounted a Great Power, while Japan was not.

    If the third card is British, note that Russia almost went to war against Great Britian as a result of a blunder in the course of the war–Russia sent her Baltic Fleet on a voyage to the far side of the world and eventual defeat at Tsushima–but the Russian fleet somehow mistook British fishermen off Dogger Bank in the North Sea for Japanese torpedo boats, and sunk a number of them, to Britain’s considerable displeasure.

    Comment by reat — December 17, 2007 @

  8. Port Arthur was significant as Japan had taken it in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895, but Russia had them stripped of it via the 3-power Intervention in 1895 and took it for themselves in 1897. It was also the site of the Japanese attack that started the war.

    Almost more important is the fact that while Japan was prepared to accept Russian predominance in Manchuria, they wanted Russian assurances to the same end over Korea, which they didn’t get.

    Comment by Ali — December 17, 2007 @

  9. This is the war that won TR the Nobel Peace Prize — the first Nobel for any American.

    Comment by taleswapper — December 17, 2007 @

  10. Indeed le petit poucet is the french fairytale known to english speakers as ‘Hop o’ My Thumb’(and Kleinduimpje to the dutch)
    Even though le petit poucet is small, he outwits the giant and thereby saves the day, fitting into the theme with the ’small’ nation of Japan achieving victory over the ‘giant’ russian empire

    Comment by Ate — December 17, 2007 @

  11. …it simply reflects the fact that before the war, Russia was accounted a Great Power, while Japan was not.

    This is a good point.

    Comment by lichanos — December 17, 2007 @

  12. These kind of mis informative tidbits that are appearing on Wikipedia are exactly why the contention about a “popularized online encyclopedia”…the dates are wrong for the Korean War…and the truth is Taiwan was gained as a Western friendly with the “Mutual Defense Treaty” back in 1952…the treaty ran out in 1979…

    Comment by frodo441 — December 17, 2007 @

  13. what is all this talk about racism…most of the kids writing about it don’t really remember what it was like…and the only real angry “racists” coming out popularly are the Daelad priests…more angry Daelad’s running back to India saying “look what the worlds done to me”…

    Comment by frodo441 — December 17, 2007 @

  14. this is like finding out that Alexander and Hermides were boetians in as much as Ian Anderson in song’s from the wood…it’s true…if you study history you learn about the “foliage” of history…but to try and make popular commentary might suffice for a diplomat but not for homogenization of media and learning of news…you have to learn…to teach yourself takes too long and the path is wrought with error…

    Comment by frodo441 — December 17, 2007 @

  15. Korea was not officially taken over by Japan until 1910.
    It was dominated by Japan before, but as far as I know, there were no Japanese troops in Korea during the Russo-Japanese war.

    Comment by Daniel Milton — December 17, 2007 @

  16. The war was about Manchuria’s natural resources and who was going to control them once they took it all over from China.

    The Russians, always desperate for warm water ports, were very keen on keeping Port Arthur because Vladivostok wasn’t ideal (ice in the winter). The Japanese, of course, saw it as a threat to their local hegemony (Korea was a Japanese colony then).

    The European powers at the time were pro-Japanese, which explains why they’re not drawn with the round glasses and buck teeth you’d see in WWII cartoons.

    The siege of Port Arthur was trench warfare just like WWI would be, except nobody realized it at the time.

    It’s a strange little war that ended when the Japanese sank half of the Russian Fleet, which had sailed all the way from the Baltic Sea, around the Cape of Good Hope, only a few hundred miles from its destination (Vladivostok).

    Peace was brokered by the USA, the Japanese were annoyed by them because the war had made them bankrupt and they were denied reparations payment from the Russians. That grudge, and many others, ended with mushroom clouds over a couple of seaports some years later.

    Comment by uberfrog — December 17, 2007 @

  17. I can think of another, non-racist, reason the Japanese might be portrayed as shorter than the Russians: They were.

    Historically, the people of Japan were shorter than Europeans, but the post-WWII booming Japanese economy resulted in them catching up.

    Comment by Darrel Jones — December 18, 2007 @

  18. Strange Maps posting of these postcards inspired me to post my vintage postcard of the Russo-Japanese War:

    http://cartophilia.com/blog/2007/12/tucks-russo-japanese-war-map.html

    Comment by Cartophiliac — December 18, 2007 @

  19. frodo441 said: “These kind of mis informative tidbits that are appearing on Wikipedia are exactly why the contention about a “popularized online encyclopedia”…the dates are wrong for the Korean War…and the truth is Taiwan was gained as a Western friendly with the “Mutual Defense Treaty” back in 1952…the treaty ran out in 1979…”

    Not sure why you’re picking on Wikipedia on this blog post, when Wikipedia was not even sited… But if it’s wrong… why don’t you fix it?

    Comment by Cartophiliac — December 18, 2007 @

  20. “cited”

    Comment by Cartophiliac — December 18, 2007 @

  21. Re the size issue, surely on the first two cards Russia is depicted as the proverbial “sleeping giant”? If I remember rightly, this description of Russia was quite common, as it was normally one of the more minor European powers but had the possibility of calling up by far the largest army if provoked. Part of the fallout from the Russo-Japanese war was the discovery that the poor training, equipment and leadership of the Russian military (and the unstable support of the population at home) made it much less of a threat than had previously been supposed.

    Comment by Ewan O'Sullivan — December 18, 2007 @

  22. “le petit poucet” is also the origin of our story of Tom Thumb.

    Comment by Buzz — December 18, 2007 @

  23. This was in fact the second time in modern history that a non-European nation defeated a European one: the Ethiopian empire had defeated the Italians in 1896 at Adua.

    Comment by Maarten — December 19, 2007 @

  24. Well-spotted, Maarten — actually, the third time: the Filipino revolutionaries expelled the Spanish colonial government in 1898, after a two-year war. Unfortunately the islands were then ceded to the USA as reparations after the Spanish-American war.

    Comment by Michel S. — December 20, 2007 @

  25. #21 is absolutely correct. The size has a lot more to do with the size of the Russian state versus Japan. If it were out and out racism, the Japanese would be portrayed with far more caricature, their faces distorted and dehumanized as is common in anti-Asian propaganda in the West. Plus, a lot of eastern “Russian” peoples are Asiatic.

    Comment by James Slone — December 21, 2007 @

  26. You know a lot about Russia, appreciate. FYI 80% of total population are Russians. And the one called by #25 Asiatic, are mainly eskimos, who have absolutely different culture to Asian people. Really Asian nations in R. are Kazakhs and Mongols, but it’s less than 1%. Maps are interesting bythemselfes and I think nobody knew this word rasism at that time and it’s all about size of countries and their power in internationsl arena

    Comment by Anna — December 21, 2007 @

  27. #24: Spain was in full control of the Philippines until the U.S. Navy showed up and destroyed the Spanish fleet in Manila Bay. (”You may fire when ready, Gridley.”)

    The U.S. then sent an expeditionary army, which occupied Manila with the assistance of Philippine insurgents. The Spanish surrendered to the United States, not the insurgents.

    Comment by Rich Rostrom — December 26, 2007 @

  28. Re: Daniel Milton

    As a matter of fact, one of the two main Japanese offensives in the war was launched from Korea, over the Yalu (the other being an amphibious landing on the Liaodong peninsula).

    Long before (in the 1895) Japan had already an army in Korea (in the first Sino-Japanese war, which was mainly over control of Korea).

    Though officialy Japan annexed Korea only in 1910, the Russo-Japanese war secured Korea as a Japanese puppet.

    Comment by Bismarck — December 26, 2007 @

  29. Interesting tidbit, from Wikipedia:

    “During the Russo-Japanese War, in 1904 and 1905, in perhaps his most famous financial action, Schiff, again through Kuhn, Loeb & Co., extended a critical series of loans to Japan, in the amount of $200 million. He was willing to extend this loan due, in part, to his belief that gold is not as important as national effort and desire, in helping win a war, and due to the apparent underdog status of Japan at the time; no European nation had ever been defeated by a non-European nation before then. It is quite likely Schiff also saw this loan as a means of taking revenge, on behalf of the Jewish people, for the anti-Semitic actions of the Tsarist regime, specifically the then-recent pogroms in Kishinev.”

    The goodwill generated by this action may have spurred the Japanese to refuse German requests to extradite the Jewish refugees in Asia.

    Comment by ben — January 9, 2008 @

  30. I’m not sure about you describing the European soldier in the first cartoon as “an English soldier on the left, probably at or near Hong Kong”. For a start, he has a blue tunic, rather than red, and also geogrphically, it looks closer to Indochine than Hong Kong, so French is more likely - a representation of the cartoonist, watching from afar, perhaps?

    Secondly, from the long pig-tailed hair and the shape of the hat, the soldier behind the Chinese Wall is…Chinese, surely, rather than colonial.

    Comment by Dave Harris — February 6, 2008 @

  31. #23 is correct - Ethiopia indeed defeated the Italians in 1896. #24 is wrong, though - the Philippines did not defeat Spain. However, Spain was defeated in Latin America earlier in the 1800s, and you could argue that the armies of the Latin American nationalist weren’t exactly European.

    Comment by Bradley — June 19, 2008 @

  32. Also, in 1803, Haiti (with some help from a yellow fever epidemic) overthrew French colonial rule.

    Comment by Bradley — June 19, 2008 @

  33. “The by now rather obscure Russo-Japanese War of 1905 was a relatively minor, mainly naval conflict that nevertheless echoed around the world: it was the first time in modern history that a non-European nation defeated a European one”. Wrong. The Abyssinians (Ethiopians) beat the Italians at Adowa in 1896.

    Comment by P.M.Lawrence — June 21, 2008 @

  34. I’ve found an even earlier defeat of Europeans by non-Europeans, the Gun War in Basutoland in the 1880s (like the British-American War it was tactically a draw, but strategically a win for the defenders).

    Comment by P.M.Lawrence — August 9, 2008 @

  35. The racism allegation is rubbish.

    The Japanese AT THAT TIME were. pm average physically smaller.
    Also, Russia was huge country.
    The David-Goliath aspects of the struggle would be emphasised by the sizing.
    The Jap. navy was largely (at that time) built in the UK at Newcastle and Barrow.
    The winning admiral’s flagship, Mikasa, built Barrow, england is preserved - a complete pre-Dreadnought battlewagon!

    Comment by G. Tingey — August 16, 2008 @

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.