Take that, Harry Beck. Try as you might, the lines on your Tube map could never be as straight as this.
Beck schematised a transportation system that was completely irregularly laid out to begin with. This map, however, shows how planning ahead would enable not just symmetry, but also better living conditions, or as the map itself states: “Slumless, Smokeless Cities”.
The map was drawn up by Sir Ebenezer Howard (1850-1928), the father of the garden city movement. Howard believed the living conditions of the poor, huddled masses cramped together in giant, insalubrious cities could be improved by combining the best aspects of town and country and carefully allocating space to housing, industry and agriculture.
He explained his urban planning ideas in ‘Tomorrow: a Peaceful Path to Real Reform’ (1898), republished as ‘Garden Cities of To-morrow’ in 1902, the year before he would actually found the very first garden city in the world: Letchworth Garden City, in the south of England. In 1920, he would found a second one, Welwyn Garden City, where he single-handedly planted a tree in the garden of each house.
The British garden city movement was important influence on the later strategy of building new towns in the UK, and spawned parallel movements in the US, Canada, Argentina, Israel and Germany.
As with most instances of social engineering, the garden city movement didn’t quite achieve what it set out to do. Its laudable motives and egalitarian vision contrast with the often depressing artificiality of ‘garden cities’, and the fact that they merely function as dormitories to the larger cities they so often adjoin.
This map of a planned, but as yet unbuilt conurbation of ‘slumless, smokeless cities’ has a few notable aspects:
• Central City (pop. 58.000) is the hub for 6 surrounding garden cities (pop. 32.000 each), all given idyllic names such as Philadelphia (’brotherly love’), Rurisville (as in ‘rural’), Justitia, Gladstone (presumably after the Prime Minister), Garden City and Concord.
• Each of these 7 urban centres is surrounded by a canal, which also connects them to the neighbouring and the central cities, forming a wheel-shaped system of waterways, the Inter Municipal Canal.
• A slightly smaller circle is formed by the Inter Municipal Railway. Within this circle lie several curious institutions: ‘Homes for Waifs’ (one imagines a neighbourhood populated by petite, sulking catwalk beauties), ‘Epileptic Farms’ (must be annoying for the cows when they’re being milked), ‘Large Farms’, an ‘Insane Asylum’ and a ‘Home for Inebriates’.
• Outside the circular railway, indeed outside the circular canal, are ‘Convalescent Homes’, ‘Stone Quarries’, ‘Cemetery’, a ‘College for the Blind’ and ‘Industrial Homes’.
• Although all basically the same shape (a circle divided into four equal parts by the intersecting waterways), each of the satellite cities has a different lay-out, allowing for variation (so those inebriates aren’t unduly confused on their way home).
This map was provided to me by Arjan Daniels.


“Philadelphia” is an idyllic name? I live in Philadelphia, and I don’t see anyone describing it that way…
Comment by Isabel — January 19, 2008 @ 3:49 pm
No, but the original Philadelphia in the Byzantine Empire has Christian Theological overtones:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaşehir#Ancient_Philadelphia
The Garden City movement is very badly thought through. A good city has mixed uses — homes, shops, businesses — in the same neighbourhood and often in the same buildings. That makes cities walkable, and transitable, and gives them an active street life.
Separating the uses by swaths of empty green space kills city life.
Comment by Leo Petr — January 19, 2008 @ 4:11 pm
Well i wouldn’t say that the garden cities were badly designed but that they didn’t take into account of the limitations of the day. Plus Sir Howard had an idealistic view of how cities should be laid out.
However we could attempt to do something like that now with a much higher degree of success. But to segregate the city into several small neighborhoods, each of residences around a heart with combo apartments/commercial/retail areas, could make it feel like a suburb.
Additionally one could could incorporate industry and power generation by placing them in their own areas and all areas could be separated by greenways that could be farms. However this doesn’t take into account of how do you manage a city like this and if one area starts to fail how do you deal with that, etc.
But i sounds kinda nice.
And thank you for this interesting blog.
Comment by David Schwartz — January 19, 2008 @ 4:53 pm
That should be: But it sounds kinda nice.
Comment by David Schwartz — January 19, 2008 @ 4:54 pm
How come these astounding coincidences with Christaller’s “Central Place Theory” (1933) and its hesagons?
Comment by Catalepton — January 19, 2008 @ 5:38 pm
See for example Christaller’s “K-7-System”.
Comment by Catalepton — January 19, 2008 @ 6:17 pm
Everything old is new again. Take a look at the fantastic car-free proposals floating around:
http://www.carfree.com/topology.html
Comment by Michael — January 19, 2008 @ 6:28 pm
Re: Christaller and hesagons…”idealized” notions of the city…
I think Le Corbusier referred to these illusions/delusions as the “Illusion of the Plan.” That is, on paper, the plan makes so much sense, but in place, well other things happen. Plans kill architecture, he said. Of course, he was guilty of that himself.
Jane Jacobs vs. mega urban renewal a la Corbu, as in Stuyvesant Town NYC, is a good example of this conflict in real life.
Comment by lichanos — January 19, 2008 @ 7:24 pm
I live very close to Letchworth and not far from Welwyn – and I do not recognise the description of ‘depressing artificiality’ or dormitories for larger towns at all.
They are both places in which residents still enjoy an admirable quality of life despite the incredible pressures on land and housing in the south east of England.
Comment by Astrofiammante — January 19, 2008 @ 7:51 pm
Sorry if this is perceived as a flame: It’s Sir Ebenezer, not Sir Howard. ‘Sir’ is used with the first name, not the surname. ( wiki: http://tinyurl.com/yqpong ).
Anyway, great map. I’ve no idea what an ‘epileptic farm’ is, unless ‘farm’ here is some kind of name for a medical institution. Alternatively, it might be a different meaning for ‘epileptic’?
Comment by SM — January 19, 2008 @ 7:56 pm
Diagram only.
Comment by Frederik — January 19, 2008 @ 8:05 pm
Look at the layout of La Plata, Argentina… A mixture of Higienism and Freemasonry.
Comment by Heguido — January 19, 2008 @ 8:18 pm
I just discovered your site (thanks, Ugi) — love it. So I wanted to share something relevant I came across last week: it’s a map of virtual communities and what not based on their member base. I can’t remember how I found it, but it seems like it’s just some CNU physics grad student behind it. Anyway, here it is, enjoy: http://xkcd.com/256/
Comment by Maria — January 19, 2008 @ 9:22 pm
Howard was always very clear to point out that his drawings were not maps – they were simply diagrams.
He was not trying to make any kind of point about geometry – only relationships.
Comment by David — January 20, 2008 @ 2:20 am
I’m sure this influenced Walt Disney and his original aborted concept of EPCOT. That and fascism.
Comment by Dr. Jahrholm Schluss — January 20, 2008 @ 11:40 am
He was a very interesting man, unfortunately the idea didnt relieve the ‘ills’ in Barking where the highest cases of asbestos poison occur and the far right hold councillor seats.
Was part of Sir Howards vision not having many pubs in the garden cities as well because I have been told so.
Comment by Navcity — January 20, 2008 @ 2:41 pm
[...] endlessly fascinating weblog Strange Maps has posted a map drawn by Sir Ebenezer Howard, founder of the Garden City movement that influenced the City Beautiful movement in the US that [...]
Pingback by The Frank Lloyd Wright Newsblog » [Tangential] Garden City map — January 20, 2008 @ 2:55 pm
I think I am am one of the few who actually like Milton Keynes
Comment by lordhutton — January 20, 2008 @ 4:09 pm
An interesting setup.
Probably the one thing that strikes me is how small the cities/towns are — the whole area is set up to house a quarter million people; a small number compared to today’s urban (and suburban) areas. Also, the fact that they plan on incorporating empty space between the cities as a way of creating self-efficiency in the area is well and good, I just hope they don’t consider the area between the city centers as space for suburbanized growth.
Comment by godozo — January 20, 2008 @ 5:40 pm
#14: If it isn’t a map, why is there a scale of miles at the bottom?
And yes, this has some odd features: the insane asylum, home for waifs, epileptic farm, home for inebriates, college for blind… For a utopian community, it sure has a lot of social and medical problems.
But that is perhaps more a reflection of the period than part of the vision. Epilepsy, alcohilism, blindness, orphans,
lunacy: all so common then that they were presumed endemic even in an ideal society.
Comment by Rich Rostrom — January 20, 2008 @ 11:16 pm
I imagine these “odd features” are in fact instrumental to Howard’s description of the planned cities as “slumless.” Probably, to his thinking, the only means to utopia was the strict sequestering of epileptics, drunks, orphans, the handicapped, etc. I’ve just finished Jacob’s “Death and Life of Great American Cities,” and find it interesting that she does not concern herself with any of these “social ills,” except drunkenness, and that quite ambivalently
Comment by ameanwhile — January 21, 2008 @ 12:00 am
[...] town planner who invented the concept of “Garden Cities”, and this is one of the iconic maps that must have been in nearly every “introduction to town planning” books. It was [...]
Pingback by Shorter items « Stephen Rees’s blog — January 21, 2008 @ 1:20 am
please see http://www.danzen.com/sage for a child’s view…
Comment by Dan Zen — January 21, 2008 @ 2:49 am
Just happened to be browsing blogs and found this. It may have been idealistic then and impractical now but it keeps the discussion going and that’s how the problems are solved.
Comment by byrningbunny — January 21, 2008 @ 4:04 am
But the man’s vision of the future city has come true! That is, if you read it like this:
“Epileptic Farms”= Rave parties
“Home for waifs”= Fashion industry
“Large Farms”= Offices
“Insane Asylum”= Parliament
Home for Inebriates= Pubs
;-P
Comment by A.R.Yngve — January 21, 2008 @ 9:22 am
When you are in Letchworth Garden City (its a boring town and looks awfull)then visit the museum dedicated to Ebenezer Howard. it makes a lots of things clear (but take the tourguide).
Comment by Arjan — January 21, 2008 @ 11:46 am
I saw a nice map you may like:
It is an inverted map of the earth, where the land masses have become oceans and vice versa
http://www.vladstudio.com/wallpaper/?510
Comment by dikidee — January 21, 2008 @ 6:17 pm
[...] of my favourite maps, a schematic for the first suburb, is featured today at Strange Maps, a blog collecting odd an imaginative ways of presenting geographic [...]
Pingback by Ottawa Citizen — January 21, 2008 @ 8:21 pm
#7 and #8:
You’re quite right, everything is new again:
http://www.masdaruae.com/
I much prefer New York, Naples, Rome, Tokyo — giant garbage heaps of human history.
Comment by charlie — January 23, 2008 @ 8:17 pm
[...] Modelo de cidade e de org. territorial [...]
Pingback by Cidade-Jardim « Conexão — January 24, 2008 @ 12:34 am
Our guy Gerard is crushing on you guys right now. He dropped a another link to you in our Hypertext Bazaar today. Check us out – http://www.memeticians.com. All the best! tjc
Memeticians
Comment by Timothy J. — January 24, 2008 @ 5:24 pm
>20. “And yes, this has some odd features: the insane asylum, home for waifs, epileptic farm, home for inebriates, college for blind… For a utopian community, it sure has a lot of social and medical problems.”
That’s what makes it utopian, not idealistic. Nobody’s waving an imaginary magic wand to make these problems vanish, instead they are being dealt with in a planned and (hopefully) successful manner.
Comment by Cudzoziemiec — January 25, 2008 @ 5:09 am
[...] betcha. http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/234-slumless-smokeless-cities/ Have a good [...]
Pingback by Professor Jennifer McStotts’ Blog » Howard’s Garden City? — January 25, 2008 @ 9:46 pm
“Waif” doesn’t refer to models. It’s an old-fashioned term for orphans who often roamed the streets.
BTW, just found this site and it’s very fascinating!
Comment by LaZorra — February 10, 2008 @ 8:53 pm
[...] A third cool map via StrangeMaps [...]
Pingback by SensoryMetrics: re-inventing the User eXperience » Navigation part 3: Reduce the commute — February 10, 2008 @ 10:34 pm
Looks like the original plans for Walt Disney’s EPCOT… even some similar concepts (no slums, convenient transportation, etc.)…
Comment by Andy — March 5, 2008 @ 8:58 pm
everyone who does not live in “Philadelphia” describle it as being idyllic.
Comment by acmerealty.ca — March 24, 2008 @ 2:49 am
Epileptic farms?
…
Cool. Like to see them try to get me in there though. Alos, lots of gardens = haven for arsonists and serial herbicidists, no?
Comment by Alice — November 12, 2008 @ 2:09 pm
This Howard map is a treasure and I was delighted to cite it in my post on garden cities. Do you know the dete it was drawn up? And was it published at the time?
many thanks
Helen Webberley
http://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com/
Comment by Hels — January 18, 2009 @ 2:35 am
thank you
Comment by Tony — May 4, 2009 @ 3:31 am
thanks for this map
good
luck
..
Comment by Solomon — May 11, 2009 @ 8:48 am
merci
Comment by aspicco . — May 17, 2009 @ 6:27 am
Vielen Dank
Comment by moon — July 3, 2009 @ 5:03 am
Muchas gracias
Comment by sun — July 4, 2009 @ 7:29 am