250 - Who Put the ‘Gau’ in Gaucho? A (Forged) Map of Nazi South America

“Hitler has often protested that his plans for conquest do not extend across the Atlantic Ocean. I have in my possession a secret map, made in Germany by Hitler’s government – by the planners of the new world order. It is a map of South America and a part of Central America as Hitler proposes to reorganize it,” revealed US President Franklin D. Roosevelt in his Navy Day address to the nation, broadcast on 27 October 1941.
The map, however, was a fake. World War II revisionists (not to put too fine a point on it: those who would have preferred the Nazis to win) claim this proves that FDR was a war-mongerer, prepared to lie shamelessly in order to drag the US into war. But in this case, FDR might have been more mongered against than mongering – the map most probably was a British forgery, not an American one.
While FDR indeed was a steadfast advocate for a more active US role in the unfolding conflict, he was up against formidable internal resistance to entry into war. It was the British who had more to gain from American involvement, because they had everything to lose. In this phase of the conflict, Britain stood virtually alone, Nazi Germany controlling most of the European continent and kicking Soviet butt in the early months of Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union. The US would only be dragged into the war after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, later that same year, on December 7.
For Britain, desperate times called for desperate measures, one of which would have been the forgery of this map, the point of which was to instill in the Americans the notion that the Nazis, if victorious in Europe, would not leave the American continent alone, thus challenging the Monroe Doctrine. The story behind the map, as (probably, but not provably) produced by the British intelligence services, went like this:
In October 1941, a British agent managed to snatch this map from the bag of a German courier straight after the latter’s involvement in a car crash in Buenos Aires. The map showed how the Nazis intended to reorganise South America into five satellite states, each one a Gau with a German Gauleiter:
• Guyana (encompassing British, Dutch and French Guyana, but wholly under the tutelage of the – collaborating – French government headquartered in Vichy);
• Neuspanien (New Spain, an agglomeration of Venezuela, Colombia, Equador and Panama – meaning the Panama Canal, at that time under US sovereignty, would at least indirectly come under Nazi control);
• Chile (being a fusion of Peru, part of Bolivia and Chile itself, dissected halfway by an Argentinian corridor to the Pacific port of Antofagasta);
• Argentina (Argentina itself, Uruguay and Paraguay, and the aforementioned Antofagasta corridor);
• Brazil (being Brazil, plus part of Bolivia).
Interestingly, the map’s legend stresses: Luftverkehrsnetz der Vereinigten Staaten Süd-Amerikas – Hauptlinien. (’Air Routes in the United States of South America – Main Lines’), indicating that these states would be joined in a well-connected subcontinent-wide political union (most likely a Nazi-induced shotgun wedding). Such a unified behemoth under German control would inevitably pose a threat to the US, FDR proposed in his Navy Day speech: “This map makes clear the Nazi design, not only against South America but against the United States as well.”
As it turned out, World War II hardly touched South America. Only after the war did it gain some notoriety as the hideout of many top-level Nazis, including Eichmann (caught by the Israelis in Argentina) and Mengele (died peacefully in Brazil).
This map was sent in by Joseph Eros, who copied it from the article ‘FDR and the Secret Map’ by John F. Fratzel and Leslie B. Trout Jr. in the 1985 New Year’s edition of Wilson Quarterly.

In October 1941, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union had already been at war for four months.
Comment by decster — March 1, 2008 @
@ decster:
You are absolutely right. I got the years mixed up, thought the Germans only invaded the USSR in 1942. Correcting the text. Thanks!
Comment by strangemaps — March 1, 2008 @
Any thoughts on the Antofagasta corridor? Seems such an odd little detail to include in the forgery (of course, good forgeries are all about the odd little details).
Comment by Silus Grok — March 1, 2008 @
The Argentine corridor is a legacy of when Bolivia was not land-locked. Bolivia used to have a chunk of land between Chile and Peru including the seaport at Antofagasta. They lost it in a war with Chile in 1883 and have been screwed ever since.
Comment by Rob — March 1, 2008 @
They don’t seem to say exactly whose islands the Falklands are. Are we supposed to guess .ar?
Comment by Lurker — March 1, 2008 @
Thanks Rob!
Comment by Silus Grok — March 1, 2008 @
The book Shadow Divers indicates that the Nazis had invasion plans written up for New York. Perhaps those came after the US entered the war.
Comment by craniac — March 1, 2008 @
I love the maps you have of what could have been, even if they’re fake!
Keep it up!
Comment by Jon Chiu — March 1, 2008 @
This map and the story around it figures prominently in William Boyd’s novel Restless — a good fun spy thriller.
Comment by Lisa — March 1, 2008 @
Brazil did participate in the Second World War. The 20,000 strong Brazilian Expeditionary Force fought in Italy. They went by the name of the Smoking Cobras after a comment by Hitler that Brazil would send combat troops when cobras smoked so the Brazilian combat troops used a badge of a smoking Cobra.The Smoking Cobra
Comment by Brett Dunbar — March 1, 2008 @
I could have sworn that Germany invaded the Soviet Union on June 30, 1941; in response to the entry of American capital, labor, and the body politic of Washington into the war on March 11, 1941. That former event is known as the Lend-Lease Act. Another little known fact is that 99% of the Jews who perished in WWII and or the Holocaust, perished after those events.
Comment by Patrick Archer — March 2, 2008 @
@Lurker (post #5)
Another mistake in this forgery… The Argentinian was neutral but a little bit pro-nazi (am I wrong? thank you for telling) so why in this “Nazi map” do we read “Falklands” (British name) and not “Malvinas” (the Argentinian name)?…
Cheers
CF
Comment by Carl Franz — March 2, 2008 @
Thanks for this frightening map!
Comment by mat — March 2, 2008 @
“Neuspanien” looks a lot like the old Greater Colombia. Only this time Caracas is the capital!
Comment by Juan — March 2, 2008 @
There are still lots of us Americans who find our involvement in WWI to be criminal and our involvement in the European theater of WWII to be sketchy at best. It wasn’t because we would be cheering for the Germans. It’s because we don’t give a hoot about European blood feuds. The Germans did not bomb Pearl Harbor. And yes, I’m ticked off about Yugoslavia too. Can we bring our troops home from Europe now?
Comment by The Dude — March 2, 2008 @
Yes, Britain “stood alone”. Ummmm, it’s our job.
The uSA bought the world victory with money and resources(eventually!), the USSR bought it with the unwilling blood of millions of its soldiers and people, but WE, the British, by holding out after the treacherous betrayal of our ally France, in June 1940 (and to whom, in her extreme torment, we offered Union, so that we and she could continue the War as one nation indissoluble) bought TIME, for all of you.
Even if we did forge this map, that was because we were Doing The Right Thing.
As to isolationist Americans at the time, or out-and-out-traitors to the Freedom Of Man, such as the incorrigible shag-fascist Joe Kennedy, who shagged his son’s girlfriends while they were not looking, we would have gone on to the death whether he liked it or not, or whether the USA had come in or not. You youngsters can’t know what it was like then.
Comment by David Davis — March 2, 2008 @
The girl friends werent looking? Must have been a tiny dick.
No one in their right minds could have imagined this as real, surely.
And as for the American intervention in Europe, it was late and slow and we are still paying for it.
But thanks anyway.
Comment by lordhutton — March 2, 2008 @
Don’t forget also that Trinidad (and Tobago?) a British colony at the time, seem to be included in Neuspanien.
Comment by David — March 2, 2008 @
@CF/12:
I dont know ow Arentina stood in te War, Wikipedia says divided but eventually Allied, owever Im obviously not oin to trust tat rit off witout any oter proof.
(Sorry for te atrocious spellin, my keyboard is ½ dead)
Comment by Lurker — March 2, 2008 @
[...] Also See: Who Put the ‘Gau’ in Gaucho? A (Forged) Map of Nazi South America, Meditation can boost your gray matter, 25 years murder-free in ‘Gun Town USA:Crime rate [...]
Pingback by Blog Round Up: Marginally Intelligent Edition | Prose Before Hos — March 2, 2008 @
Hey the Dude, what about the Reuben James? Those murdered Americans not good enough for you?
Comment by Cappy — March 3, 2008 @
[...] again Strange Maps has impressed me with another (strange) map. This time, the map was a supposed creation of Adolf Hitler in preparation for the invasion of [...]
Pingback by The Nazi South America « The Political Inquirer — March 3, 2008 @
Actually Brazil send a lot more men to war.
Some of them were part of a P40 squadron called “Senta a Pua”, which has a ostrich like mascot.
Brazil had the first organized Air Force in Latin America, after WWII
Comment by George Silva — March 3, 2008 @
“While FDR indeed was a steadfast advocate for a more active US role in the unfolding conflict, he was up against formidable internal resistance to entry into war.”
contradiction yourself much?
Comment by scarhand — March 3, 2008 @
contradict*
Comment by scarhand — March 3, 2008 @
O wow!
Comment by Rohit — March 3, 2008 @
Very interesting. It calls to mind Bush’s use of “sexed-up” British intelligence to sell the war on Iraq. One wonders what historians will say 50 to 100 years from now.
In retrospect the Nazis were seen as evil because of the Holocaust. At the time, however, I think that both FDR and Churchill either did not know or did not care about Hitler’s genocide. The very good reason for FDR’s desire to enter WWII was a fear of Europe being dominated by a single power whilst Japan was dominating Asia at the same time.
For now, though, the US should get out of Europe entirely and leave them to their own devices. The EU seems to have found the perfect solution to Europe’s endemic problems: let each nationality have their own state, flag, language, etc., but leave the important stuff (the economy, stupid) to unelected bureacrats in Brussells.
Comment by Jim Linnane — March 3, 2008 @
[...] nepkaart (1941) van een nazistisch Latijns-Amerika03-03-2008 om 14:23 door Carlos Britse nepkaart (1941) van een nazistisch Latijns-Amerika die Amerika moest overhalen om mee te doen… Geschiedenis, Groot-Brittannië, Latijns-Amerika, Waan v/d Dag Terug naar het [...]
Pingback by Britse nepkaart (1941) van een nazistisch Latijns-Amerika - Sargasso — March 3, 2008 @
I know this is a fake map and all, but is there any logical reason one would put Peru under the same jurisdiction as Chile? Two very different societies, and “you can’t get there from here.”
Comment by Brittain33 — March 3, 2008 @
As far as the Falklands go, I think Germany (having conquered the U.K.) would’ve assumed sovereignty there and maybe in the British, French, and Dutch Caribbean in order to keep an eye on its South American puppets.
I don’t think claims that FDR was a warmonger don’t necessarily go with wishing the Nazis had won. While Roosevelt abhorred Nazism, he and Truman also used the war to replace the British Empire on the world stage with the American one that still obtains, however shakily. Some of us think was a bad sequel to the noble destruction of fascism
Comment by Huntington — March 3, 2008 @
I also question Chile getting Peru. Wouldn’t Peru + Bolivia + Antofagasta make more sense? They could use that for propaganda internally. Chile could get Patagonia and take Uruguay? and the Falklands in return and all have various “victories” over old enemies before they “united”?
PS. Yes, I know, this armchair alternate history-ing, so it’s probably ridiculous sounding to people who actually know these countries.
Comment by Lurker — March 3, 2008 @
Actually, Peru+Bolivia+Antofagasta would result a lot like the Viceroyalty of Peru from colonial times, so there’s some historical precedent.
Comment by Juan — March 3, 2008 @
The map was forged, but the intent was not. This was the plan by the Nazis, the British just couldn’t get their hands on actual hard data, and reconstructed it.
Comment by Christopher Taylor — March 3, 2008 @
“(not to put too fine a point on it: those who would have preferred the Nazis to win) ”
Though I am a big fan of your blog, I’m disheartened to see this sort of blatant mis-characterization of historians who attempt to view the past in a speculative format. Just because some people ponder how life would have been different if the Confederacy won the war, it does not mean that they wish the Confederacy won the war.
Sometimes it doesn’t hurt though to look at history through skeptical eyes and attempt to understand the true motives behind history, and not the patriotism and nationalistic “can-do-no-wrong” story of our nation’s history that most text books attempt to tell.
I don’t think questioning George Bush’s motivations for going into Iraq means I didn’t wish for a better life for Iraqi citizens-
Comment by aaron — March 3, 2008 @
[...] puso el “Gau” en gauchos, la historia de nazi suramericana 3 03 2008 lean aca mas a fondo, lo mio es un [...]
Pingback by quien puso el “Gau” en gauchos, la historia de nazi suramericana « [ JoC ] HeAvIeR ThAn HeAvEn — March 3, 2008 @
@34: I think his point was that that sort of WWII-revisionist would be the one to use this map to make those claims about FDR; not that anyone who is interested in such maps as these, or speculations about a different end to the war, are Nazi sympathizers.
Additional thought: Would Argentina & Chile have to give up their respective “antarcticas” to aggrandize Nazi Germany’s “New Swabia” ?
Comment by Lurker — March 4, 2008 @
I really enjoy your blog, never know what I will come across.
Comment by nwlimited — March 4, 2008 @
A modern parallel: The British saying that Saddam had purchased significant quantities of “yellow cake” uranium, and Bush reporting it in his State of the Union address.
Do you suppose FDR would have said that Saddam had WMD?
Thanks for your always astounding blog.
Comment by Mark from Maine — March 4, 2008 @
Can anyone read the handwritten comments?
Comment by Lurker — March 4, 2008 @
The British saying that Saddam had purchased significant quantities of “yellow cake” uranium, and Bush reporting it in his State of the Union address.
Just for the sake of accuracy: What he said was “[t]he British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa” - not that it had PURCHASED the uranium.
Comment by Sartorius — March 4, 2008 @
Interesting how just after this map is published, Hugo Chavez and Colombia are about to go to war…
Imagine if “Neu Spanien” actually came to fruition because of this…!
Comment by Steve — March 4, 2008 @
@41: This map was published ages ago, unless you mean here.
While I agree that Ecuador and Venezuela could go together (Based on current politics), I don’t see Colombia joining (Unless forced to by the above two), much less Panama or (!) Trinidad and Tobago!
Also, I HIGHLY doubt Chavez (If he won) would go for the name “New Spain” given how badly he appears to think of Spain. I would say he’d call it Bolivia, but that’s already taken. Bolivaria maybe?
Comment by Lurker — March 4, 2008 @
Anyone interested in the period and topic this map embodies should read the new book by Nicholson Baker, Human Smoke. It’s a marvelous anecdotal re-examination of the received wisdom about the global politcal situation in the thirties and forties.
Comment by James — March 4, 2008 @
@ the dude 15
Two officials from the German Embassy in Washington delivered a note stating that a state of war existed between the United States and Germany on the morning of Dec 11, 1941. The United States did not declare war until later that day.
This info was taken from the Avalon project at Yale Law, regarding the Germans, and Oklahoma Law school regarding American entry to the war.
@27
No one on the outside could conceive the level of depravity exhibited by Germany towards “untermenschen”. But many of the measures taken already gave a hint that this would be one of the worsts pogroms in history. Kristallnacht, the Nuremberg codes, and of course all of the people who tried so desperately to get out,but were not allowed into the various Western countries.
The same thing has happened with almost every genocide since WWII. The crimes perpetrated are so horrific that one can’t get their mind around the fact that one human could do that to another.
Pol Pot in Cambodia, Saddam with the Kurds in Iraq, and the Bosnian Serbs with the Croats and Bosniacs.
Every time these things occur, western governments and reporters can’t believe these things are really occurring. They either believe that the people recounting the horrors are exaggerating things they witnessed, involved in the most horrific game of telephone ever, or are telling stories intentionally to make the other side seem worse.
Comment by jon — March 4, 2008 @
An addition to Jon (#44):
I personally believe that the American Government suppressed the news of the Holocaust so that the American Army could focus on their job (of defeating the Nazi Army). If we had known what was going on in the camps before they came up on them, we would have been distracted by that news probably to depression and inaction. And George Orwell’s vision of the world in the book 1984 might have been a bit closer to reality (in that the Russians would probably have conquered/ would have been welcomed in the European Subcontinent).
Comment by godozo — March 5, 2008 @
I know this is of topic but I just wanted to point out some nice little maps.
Here: http://uzar.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/federal-republic-of-poland/
Here: http://uzar.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/united-states-of-european-chaos/
and here:
http://uzar.wordpress.com/2007/02/18/adventures-in-ruritania/
Comment by Raf Uzar — March 5, 2008 @
Raf Uzar,
What would cause Poland to break into several smaller countries?
Comment by Ron — March 5, 2008 @
wow i feel like i am in a history class lmao… http://www.xebronics.org
Comment by nancyjones28 — March 7, 2008 @
Or may be i feel like i am watching the discovery channel Nancy
Comment by nancyjones28 — March 7, 2008 @
or may be national geographic lol http://nancyjones28.wordpress.com/
Comment by nancyjones28 — March 9, 2008 @
Una Sudamérica nazi
En los primeros años de la II Guerra Mundial, la victoria alemana parecía incuestionable. El Reino Unido se encontraba sólo en Europa a la espera de que Estados Unidos declarase la guerra a Alemania. Este mapa es una falsificación, posiblemente bri…
Trackback by meneame.net — March 10, 2008 @
[...] is a great maps site called “Strange Maps” I check out from time to time. I liked this fake Nazi map of South America, mostly because of the FDR quote mentioning the New World Order. I never realised he was a tinfoil [...]
Pingback by Who Put the ‘Gau’ in Gaucho? A (Forged) Map of Nazi South America | Green Link Central - Articles — March 10, 2008 @
Nazi Germany attacked the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. not June 30.
I think the author of this blog is conflating all World War II revisionists with Holocaust revisionists.
Not everyone who asks questions about the standard view of WWII is a Nazi sympathizer.
Comment by Marty Busse — March 11, 2008 @
[...] Strangemaps time saved time [...]
Pingback by Nazi Map Found in Buenos Aires a Fake — March 11, 2008 @
[...] este mapa es falso. Según el post publicado por Strange Maps, basado en investigadores de la Segunda Guerra Mundial aparecidas en el libro “FDR y el mapa [...]
Pingback by mirá! » Archivo » El mapa secreto de Hitler — March 11, 2008 @
Brazilian merchant ships were attacked by German submarines during the war, which led the Brazilians to join the US’s 5th Army during the Italian Campaign.
Comment by Maués — March 17, 2008 @
[...] Post by strangemaps. Read full post. [...]
Pingback by 250 - Who Put the ‘Gau’ in Gaucho? A (Forged) Map of Nazi South America | Blog Feed Aggregator — March 19, 2008 @
the korridor thing sucks, many chilean soldiers died figthing the peruvian and bolivian troops,that soil have chilean blood in it.So, thank god this map will never take place.
Comment by javier — March 21, 2008 @
the korridor thing sucks, many chilean soldiers died figthing the peruvian and bolivian troops,that soil have chilean blood in it.So, thank god this map will never take place.
Comment by javier — March 21, 2008 @
[...] tal mapa graças ao ótimo Strange Maps. Leia [...]
Pingback by Como Hitler pretendia conquistar a América do Sul | Bizarro | A Grande Abobora — April 3, 2008 @