The Eurovision Song Contest proves that H.L. Mencken’s famous dictum about quality standards in the US media – “Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public” – also holds for Europe. The pan-European ‘talent’ show is big on kitsch and schmaltz, pathos and bombast, blandness and gimmicks. It rarely produces genuine hits or memorable evergreens. And yet, the Eurosong is one of the longest-running tv programs in the world (organized annually by the European Broadcasting Union since 1956), and one of the best-watched ones (hundreds of millions of viewers every year, many outside Europe).
The basic procedure of Eurovision is thus: each year, an EBU affiliate in each participating country chooses a song to compete in the contest, held in the country that won last year’s contest. The contest, broadcast live, is usually held on a Saturday in May. After all the songs are performed, a jury (more recently, the viewing public, by televote and text message) in each country grades the other countries’ songs and a new winner is chosen.
The votes are generally perceived to be only partly about the songs performed. They are used to express closeness (or to counterbalance antipathy) between nations. It is expected for countries who share a geographical or cultural affinity to vote ‘in blocks’: the Balkan countries can usually be counted on to give each other the highest marks, as are the Scandinavian countries, or the former Soviet republics.
This musical nepotism has always been a factor, but as the playing field has gotten a lot more crowded since the Eastern European nations started participating (necessitating the institution of semifinals and a system of relegation), irritation about the practice has grown – especially in the West, since the Eastern countries tend to keep their votes ‘in the family’. Terry Wogan, who has provided the contest with ironic commentary for the BBC since time immemorial (1980, actually), has stated that he doesn’t want to present it again for this very reason. Italy has refused to participate for the last few years for the same reason.
This map, sent in by Richard Mellor and to be found on the Diamond Geezer blog, shows how far east the epicenter of Eurosong voting was in the recent 2008 edition.
And finally, just because lists are fun, some Eurosong trivia:
• The Eurovision Song Contest, modelled on the Sanremo Music Festival, was first held in Lugano (Switzerland) on 24 May 1956; 7 countries participated, each submitting 2 songs – the only time this happened.
• In 1968, the UK contended that Spain had not voted for their entry (Cliff Richards’ ‘Congratulations’) to keep it from winning. Recent press stories seem to indicate that General Franco himself orchestrated this, enabling that year’s win by Spain.
• In 1969, France, Spain, the Netherlands and the UK all tied for first place and were all declared the winner. Five countries stayed away in protest from the 1970 contest. A tie-break rule has since been agreed upon.
• In April 1974, a military coup was planned in Portugal, and the trigger for action was the broadcast of its Eurovision entry that year, E depois do adeus, sung by Paulo de Carvalho, on national radio. The following year, the Portuguese entry was the aptly titled Madrugada (April Dawn), sung by Duarte Mendes, then a serving officer with the Portuguese army.
• Participating countries must lie within the ‘European Broadcasting Area’, which not only includes Israel, but potentially also Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan. And other areas: in 1980, Morocco participated.
• In 1978, Jordanian tv cut to pictures of flowers during the Israeli performance, and ended transmission when it became apparent Israel was going to win. Jordanian news afterwards reported that the contest had been won by Belgium, which came in second.
• A win in Eurosong only rarely leads to a succesful, rockstar-sized international career. Exceptions are ABBA (Sweden, 1974) and Céline Dion (Switzerland, 1988).
• Since 1989, a strange Eurovision pattern emerged regarding the winning countries: in 1989 Yugoslavia wins for the first (and only) time; in 1990 Italy wins for the second time; in 1991Sweden wins for the third time; in 1992 Ireland wins for the fourth time; in 1993 Ireland wins for the fifth time and in 1994 Ireland wins for the sixth time.


For the fun facts: Luxembourg does not take part because the second time they won, they couldn’t find a place big enough for the event.
Comment by Fireball — May 27, 2008 @ 5:01 pm
Those interested can check my blog
http://academiacajander.blogspot.com
where a couple of days ago I posted two graphs with the evolution of the results of the four countries with more economical contribution to Eurovision Song contest (Spain, UK, Germany and France – they cover 40% of the cost – the rest 39 countries cover the other 60%)
Perhaps I can also make some strange maps out from data like that?. :-)
P.S. Sorry to say but text is in Spanish – but I guess graphics are explicit enough.
P.S.2 And sorry for the sef-citation but I think it was a good complement to this map.
Comment by Amio Cajander — May 27, 2008 @ 5:10 pm
CCCP?
Comment by Cappy — May 27, 2008 @ 6:49 pm
Small correction there: “Madrugada” means simply “dawn”. I don’t know if the song’s title was translated to English as “April Dawn”, but if it was, that’s incorrect strictly linguistically speaking. Politically, yes, it’s an apt translation, since the song’s lyrics do refer to the democratic revolution of 1974.
Comment by Jorge — May 27, 2008 @ 11:15 pm
It’s not so much that it’s block voting, but rather the fact that most of the Western countries seem to send their D-Grade material in hoping for a win when they clearly suck. I mean c’mon… Chica chica!? That was ridiculous.
Comment by Lucian — May 28, 2008 @ 2:24 am
Why is Israel competing in the Eurovision contest?
Comment by Peter — May 28, 2008 @ 2:27 am
nice blog!
Comment by gene wolff — May 28, 2008 @ 7:47 am
Hey, Chiki Chiki was awesome, it’s not Spain’s fault the rest of Europe didn’t get the joke.
I’m just pleased Spain has evolved into being one of the mature cool kids who just makes fun of the contest instead of getting all prideful and nationalistic about it.
Comment by Sean — May 28, 2008 @ 10:56 am
When nations had to compete in their own language during the nineties, Anglophone countries completely dominated because English is so widely understood. Now Easter European countries dominate because their songs and their aesthetic (horrible horrible dated) aesthetic) are more appealing to fellow Eastern Europeans who didn’t get to freely enjoy 80s pop the first time around.
Comment by Ali — May 28, 2008 @ 11:58 am
Hey, we can all self-cite:
http://www.hartnup.net/wordpress/archives/2008/05/27/myths-about-the-eurovision-song-contest-that-are-not-true/
Taste is totally subjective, and the only thing you can expect of a contest that relies on the votes of the general public is that something popular will win. Russia’s Dima Bilan is already a megastar across the vast Russian Speaking world (like Ricky Martin is to Spanish speakers).
The vote is somewhat skewed by migrant populations voting for their homeland (you can’t otherwise vote for your own country).
I’d love to see more maps analysing the contest. It’s a shame the text presentation of this own makes it so low-res. I’d also like to see less aliasing in the colour gradation.
Comment by John H — May 28, 2008 @ 12:10 pm
To Peter:
Well, we won three times and came in the top 5 at least five times more… so I guess Europe is fine with it.
Comment by Yuval — May 28, 2008 @ 1:42 pm
[...] [UPDATE - 28.05.08] An excellent graphical representation of the results at Strange Maps. [...]
Pingback by Jon Worth » Blog Archive » Qele victoire! Why Armenia should have won Eurovision — May 28, 2008 @ 8:04 pm
[...] The Strange Maps blog links to a text map of the Eurovision Song Contest result. [...]
Pingback by Cartogrammar.com | Blog - Andy Woodruff, cartographer — May 28, 2008 @ 8:17 pm
@Peter
Gosh, you have posed a most interesting question. Because Israel is a member of the European Broadcasting Union? Nah, can’t be that.
And if you are going to be a stickler, I do hope you don’t call yourself a citizen of “America”.
Comment by Marc Naimark — May 29, 2008 @ 8:37 pm
Peter, Israel participates in Eurovision because they have given up winning Arabvision.
And I have to point out that the link between Celine Dions win in the 1988 Eurovision and her later career is tenous at best.
Comment by Katalysator — May 30, 2008 @ 8:47 am
There must be a list somewhere of all the votes cast. Given that, I could make a “map” in which proximity represents tendency to vote for each other.
Comment by Anton Sherwood — May 30, 2008 @ 8:43 pm
The Eurovision Song Contest is an excellent first line of defense for us Americans when Europeans accuse us of being unsophisticated.
Comment by michael5000 — May 31, 2008 @ 3:04 pm
[...] is working on a series of linocut prints of typographic maps. The Strange Maps blog links to a text map of the Eurovision Song Contest result. I found a typographic map in the portfolio of Elena Zubowicz, but unfortunately it’s [...]
Pingback by Cartogrammar.com | Blog » Hello world! — June 3, 2008 @ 3:38 am
Why did Celine Dion compete for Switzerland? She’s from Quebec.
Peter – you might note that Turkey also competes in this, despite being far more of an Asian country than a European one.
Comment by Bob — June 22, 2008 @ 3:55 am
@Bob: a country can ask whoever they want to represent them, which is why Céline Dion came to represent Switzerland in 1988. Another example is Greek singer Vicky Leandros, who won Eurovision in the early ’70s (1972?) for Luxembourg.
Comment by Ludwig — July 7, 2008 @ 2:36 pm
interesting Map!!
Comment by industryfinest — September 13, 2008 @ 5:26 am
thanks
Comment by games — October 15, 2008 @ 6:15 pm
Host said: “It rarely produces genuine hits or memorable evergreens.”
Which is totally false. Loads of Eurovision entries have become hits, both nationally and internationally.
The quality of the whole show is of course debatable, but it’s pretty common among Europeans to watch it for the unintended comedy of the whole thing.
There have been talks about banning Israel from competing due to their rather unsavory way of treating the Palestinians (The same reason their EU membership application was turned down pretty fast, I guess.). But it’s also part of a larger discussion of which countries actually belong to Europe. Cyprus is also an Asian country, but is still a member of the EU. Armenia and Georgia are transcontinental nations, but the European part of their territories is very small.They tend to be included in the wider definition of Europe, however, due to the cultural and linguistic ties. Same could apply to Israel, but in their case their not even close to Europe geographically. Portugal has also opted for the accession of Cape Verde to the EU on the same grounds I mention. Yes, Cape Verde belongs to Africa, but so do the Canary Islands, too, although part of a European nation. It’s an interesting discussion at any rate.
Comment by Ole P. — March 19, 2009 @ 10:37 am
thank you
Comment by Tony — May 4, 2009 @ 3:42 am
thanks for this map
good
luck
…
Comment by Solomon — May 11, 2009 @ 8:54 am
merci
Comment by aspicco . — May 17, 2009 @ 6:40 am
Vielen Dank
Comment by moon — July 3, 2009 @ 5:15 am
Muchas gracias
Comment by sun — July 4, 2009 @ 7:39 am