Strange Maps

July 25, 2008

301 – Look At the State You’re In: Absaroka

Filed under: Uncategorized — strangemaps @ 11:45 am

In its short-lived attempt at existence, the US state of Absaroka (pronounced ab-SOR-kamanaged to acquire quite a few trappings of statehood: a governor and capital were selected, Absarokan car license plates issued, and there even was a Miss Absaroka 1939 (the first and only one). The King of Norway also visited, apparently – although he might not have suspected that it was a state visit.

On another continent or in another era, all this might have qualified Absaroka for total independence. But alas, in 1930s America, with its by then well-established administrative divisions, even statehood proved to be beyond the Absarokans’ grasp. And the fledgling state might have faded from history entirely, had it not been recorded by the Federal Writers’ Project, eager to include it as an example of cowboyin’ couleur locale.

That record was one of the sources for an article on Absaroka by New York Times journalist Kirk Johnson (‘A State That Never Was In Wyoming’, NYT, 24 July 08), which was kindly forwarded to Strange Maps by Ruland Kolen and Alex Meerovich. And that is how we first heard of Absaroka – a joyous occasion on a par with our first intimations of Amikejo, Stellaland, Imperial Texas, or any other of the ephemeral states that were discussed previously on this blog (Subcarpathian Ruthenia remains our favourite – independent for only slightly longer than the time it takes to pronounce its name).

Absaroka means ‘children of the large-beaked bird’ and is the name given to the Crow Indians by their relatives, the Hidatsa. It also is the name of a local mountain range. Which is ironic, as the state’s unifying characteristic would have been its rancher culture, which obviously owes more on the horizontality of prairie than the verticality of mountains.

What kicked off the secessionist movement, was the independent-minded ranchers’ opposition to the interventionist New Deal proposed by president F.D. Roosevelt. Absaroka was to be composed of similar-feeling parts of Wyoming and two other states: Montana and South Dakota. The state was the brainchild of a group of aggrieved locals, but mainly of one A.R. Swickard, Absaroka’s self-appointed governor. The NY Times reproduced this map of Absaroka based on one sketched out by Swickard and his co-conspirators in Sheridan, Wyoming – the ‘capital’ of Absaroka.

“It was 90 miles of dirt road to the county seat. There was just nothing there. What Swickard did was exciting,” Mr Johnson quotes local resident Helen Graham (89). Things are really bad when secessionism is the only freely available form of decent entertainment. It remains unclear how serious the clamour for Absarokan statehood really was, or when and how it ended. Any additional information - including a higher-res map or a picture of Miss Absaroka (providing it’s from 1939) – would be greatly appreciated.


64 Comments »

  1. They were lucky that FDR didn’t invade them and burn them and their cows to the ground. Claims of secession by former US states have been met with Total War tactics 100% of the time. And FDR was hardly big on individual or minority rights.

    Comment by Legate Damar — July 25, 2008 @ 1:34 pm

  2. [...] The great state of Absaroka — Another historical oddity I’ve never heard of. As opposed to, say, the War of Jenkins’ Ear. Of which I have heard. [...]

    Pingback by [links] Link salad for a Friday | jlake.com — July 25, 2008 @ 1:49 pm

  3. What exactly didn’t they like about Wyoming, South Dakota and Montana that they would need their own state for? Are Northern & Western Montanans, Eastern S. Dakotans, and Southern Wyominites that out of touch and different than their counterparts?

    If you sense some sarcasm, there is more than a touch there. Just about every other state has more diverse and therefore legitimate regions that could form their own states. If my heads in the sand, please pull it out for me.

    Comment by BAT — July 25, 2008 @ 1:53 pm

  4. They would have had Yellowstone, and maybe mt rushmore, and crazy horse and all those badlands. it would have been National Park state.

    Comment by Brian — July 25, 2008 @ 2:10 pm

  5. http://www.jacksonholewy.com/community/blogs/jackson_hole_blog/

    Claims picture of 1939 Mss Absaroka.

    Comment by Joshua — July 25, 2008 @ 3:27 pm

  6. Where’s a map of the crazy Northern Californian and Southern Oregonians in their “State of Jefferson?”

    Comment by Mario — July 25, 2008 @ 3:38 pm

  7. Would that have been the least populated state if it came to pass? I mean, I’ve been out there once and there’s nothing there.

    Though Brian’s right about it becoming the National Park state. South Dakota would have a devil of a time trying to find something for their state paraphernalia. The Mitchell Corn Palace just don’t cut it.

    Comment by El Santo — July 25, 2008 @ 4:49 pm

  8. Legate – They were not seceding from the US – just forming their own state. This has happened plenty of times.

    PS – Awesome blog. I saw the map in the NYT yesterday and thought of you, but figured that you would already be on it

    Comment by Art — July 25, 2008 @ 5:06 pm

  9. please name one state that was formed out of another state. West Virginia was an illegal act — although the rest of the state didn’t want it back. Western claims by east coast states were all given to the federal government, so they Kentucky, for instance wasn’t “formed from Virginia. Maybe North and South Dakota. Vermont and New York fought a small war over their boundary lines.

    Comment by charlie — July 25, 2008 @ 5:15 pm

  10. Maine used to be part of Massachusetts. It became its own state as part of the Missouri Compromise in 1820.

    Comment by omarshanks — July 25, 2008 @ 6:18 pm

  11. to be technical, I’m not sure the “District of Maine” was an organic part of Massachusetts or a colony. But you are right, sir. It is a distinction without a difference.

    I suppose most of the Louisiana territory was once part of Louisiana, legally speaking; but I’m not sure if the State of Louisiana ever owned that land.

    Comment by charlie — July 25, 2008 @ 7:27 pm

  12. I’m trying to put these on Google maps. Here’s Absaroka:

    http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&ie=UTF8&msa=0&msid=104060857742009673122.000452cca422125a1fc50&z=6

    It was easy. I’d like to do Deseret and some others from the site.

    Comment by garak64 — July 25, 2008 @ 7:52 pm

  13. I imagine the drive for Absaroka disappeared due to World War II, same as the drive for Jefferson statehood. Some things looked rather silly and unimportant after Pearl Harbor got bombed.

    Comment by Sotosoroto — July 25, 2008 @ 8:12 pm

  14. If an attempt to create a new state or, for an existing one to secede, and that effort created real fear within America’s ruling elite class rest assured the “proper” bureaucrats and bureaucracies would do their duties, obey their masters and rush of to manage the threat to the elite’s status quo.

    One fairly recent example was the brave courageous FBI sharpshooter who, from afar, in total safety to himself, murdered a citizen with a shot to the head. A mother, weaponless, standing in the doorway to her home while holding her baby.

    Threaten the elite’s status quo at your peril.

    Your life, the lives of a million American citizens, is a minute price to pay to protect the ever-growing wealth and power of America’s elites, their minions and their lackeys.

    Obey.

    Or pay the price.

    Resistance is futile.

    Comment by obbop — July 25, 2008 @ 10:41 pm

  15. The State of Jefferson is alleged to have only lost its momentum due to the fact that it was picking up in October and November 1941, just prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor. The name still lives on. The local public radio is “Jefferson Public Radio,” and many references in the northern CA and southern OR counties would make one think it is an actual state.

    Comment by jered — July 25, 2008 @ 11:11 pm

  16. On the other hand, if it had been granted statehood, the Crow and Northern Cheyenne, not to mention a few Nez Perce who remained after Chief Joseph’s capture, might be well represented in Congress.

    Comment by lirelou — July 25, 2008 @ 11:18 pm

  17. [...] 301 – Look At the State You’re In: Absaroka [image] In its short-lived attempt at existence, the US state of Absaroka (pronounced ab-SOR-ka) managed to acquire [...] [...]

    Pingback by Top Posts « WordPress.com — July 26, 2008 @ 12:02 am

  18. Hello we are http://www.imdrivingnow.com. We are located in Indianapolis,In. We help get clients financed for an automobile. Are you tired o pushy, hungry carsalsmen? Cut through the chase by logging onto http://www.imdrivingnow.com The program that we offer is very unique and easy. Our staff members have a minimum of 5years expierence in the automobile industry Clients are vey impressed by the length of time spent in dealershps after qualifying through http://www.imdrivingnow.Thank you for taking the time to re about our pany and what we do. Remember…We’ll do what ever it take to earn your business!

    Comment by imdrivingnow.com — July 26, 2008 @ 12:21 am

  19. Now, this is really cool stuff. Thanks for a fantastic history lesson – yet again!

    Comment by Aramink — July 26, 2008 @ 1:12 am

  20. Have you ever blogged about the Conch Republic? I can’t find any online maps, but the website states the “boundary” fairly clearly when viewing it on a map of Florida. It does seem fitting for the Keys that the boundary was marked by a bar

    http://www.conchrepublic.com

    Comment by kishnevi — July 26, 2008 @ 1:42 am

  21. “We’ll do what ever it take to earn your business!”

    Even if we have to cast aside all personal honor and spam a message board with foul filthy cruddy spam.

    Unless it is a competitor that placed the spam here trying to put imdrivingnow in the worst possible light.

    If the spammer IS the firm named, it is the duty of every decent human to boycott the firm for as long as the rivers run and the gras grows.

    Comment by obbop — July 26, 2008 @ 1:54 am

  22. Here’s my take on this, vis a vis the State of Jefferson:
    http://geographile.blogspot.com/2008/07/state-of-self-determination.html

    Comment by Mary — July 26, 2008 @ 5:42 am

  23. @ Joshua (#5):
    Thanks; although I’m not sure whether this picture doesn’t just show some local gals holding up the aforementioned Absaroka car license plates. I mean, there’s no sash, no bathing suit. But those might have been in short supply in Absaroka…

    @ garak64 (#12):
    Thanks for that map, nice one! I’d love to see what a Deseret Google map would look like…

    @ kishnevi (#20):
    Thanks for the link. I know of the Conch Republic, but haven’t seen a cool map of it – or any map, come to think of it.

    @ obbop (#21):
    I try to delete spam when I find it, but your comment convinced me to leave this one in. Because I too am “tired o pushy, hungry carsalsmen”. As everyone should be.

    @ Mary (#22):
    Thanks for your excellent post on Jefferson! Unfortunately, the maps you refer to are the same two (and the only ones) I’ve seen before; I’m holding out for a better-quality one…

    Comment by strangemaps — July 26, 2008 @ 6:17 am

  24. Absaroka appears to have been the Crow name for their territory. At least Bernard DeVoto uses it that way in his history of the mountain west “Across the Wide Missouri”. On page 86 he notes, concerning some Gros Ventre war parties: “So they got to Absaroka, the Crow country, and a band of their toughest enemies cut them to pieces. It was the best fiesta the Crows had had in years – women, children, horses, war chiefs, boys, old men, and such personal belongings as were left.” His chapter V is entitled “Absaroka (1833)”
    Brings up a minor point on the modern attempt. The Northern Cheyenne were among the last plains tribes to be subddued. In reward for their faithful service as allies, the Crows had been given a large chunk of eastern Montana. But when the Cheyenne surrendered, the question arose: Where to put them? Someone came up with the observation that the Crows had a pretty large reservation. Why not take back part of it and put the Northern Cheyenne smack dab in the middle? Thereby letting the Crow keep an eye on them. So it was done. The two groups do not get along. I wonder what how the name “Absaroka” went down with the Northern Cheyenne, who, coincidentally, often work as police officers on the Crow Agency. Incidentally, the Northern Cheyenne refer to the Crow as the “dog people”, and their major war society was the “dog soldiers” society, whose members made their bones by killing “dog people”.

    Comment by lirelou — July 26, 2008 @ 2:41 pm

  25. [...] its short-lived attempt at existence, the US state of Absaroka pronounced ab-SOR-ka managed to acquire quite a few trappings of statehood: a governor and capital [...]

    Pingback by Truth (Plus Lies) » Blog Archive » 301 - Look At the State You’re In: Absaroka « Strange Maps — July 26, 2008 @ 8:48 pm

  26. [...] Via 301 – Look At the State You’re In: Absaroka « Strange Maps [...]

    Pingback by Frickin Wicked! » Blog Archive » Frickin Wicked is…. “Ghost States — July 26, 2008 @ 10:24 pm

  27. While these new state movements don’t come up that frequently, they are pretty interesting for what they say about how we drew state boundaries in a haphazard manner and never really went back to clean things up. Probably at least half of the states are set up in a manner that simply doesn’t make sense in the 21st century. Two great examples are New York and Illinois. There is really no reason that the state that includes New York City shouldn’t also include much of New Jersey and some of Connecticut or that the state that includes Chicago shouldn’t include much of northwestern Indiana. Likewise, including New York City in the same entity as upstate (read broadly) New York is simply silly – it makes it much more difficult to get things done in either region.

    For better or worse, though, we’re stuck with what we’ve got.

    Comment by Charles — July 26, 2008 @ 10:57 pm

  28. If nothing else, if it had been left as a state, it would break up the driving monotony between WY and MT. Anyone ever taken a road-trip up that way? It’s BRUTAL.

    Comment by JO — July 26, 2008 @ 11:49 pm

  29. I could have sworn I put this comment in the other day but I guess not.

    http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s130/RockNTheFreeWorld_photo/MissAbsaroka1939.jpg

    That is a screenshot of the only pic I could find of a woman wearing a Miss Absaroka sash.

    Comment by RockNTheFreeWorld — July 27, 2008 @ 12:10 am

  30. Don’t forget the proposed State of Superior- Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. I seem to recall liscense plates on the front of vehicles last time I cruised through.

    Comment by Cod Liver Oil — July 27, 2008 @ 3:21 am

  31. It an interesting idea though – we are our states considered set in stone until infinity? Breaking up California into 2 or 3 states makes a lot of sense. Combinng the Dakato’s as well. Every 50 years we should reconsider these things.

    Comment by RobertSeattle — July 27, 2008 @ 4:26 am

  32. Very interesting. Just FYI, there’s nothing really “ironic” about the “rancher culture” state having a name derived from the local mountain range. The mountains in that area support numerous and extensive ranching operations.

    Comment by alamode — July 27, 2008 @ 4:34 am

  33. You neglect to mention Cascadia, which would unify WA, OR and British Columbia as a sovereign nation:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_(independence_movement)

    Comment by Rob — July 27, 2008 @ 6:50 am

  34. Forming new states out of old states is Constitutionally allowed, but with great restrictions.

    Article IV

    “Section 3. New states may be admitted by the Congress into this union; but no new states shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state be formed by the junction of two or more states, or parts of states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as of the Congress. ”

    The US disregarded that with West Virginia by just not recognizing the elected legislature of Virginia and instead recognizing one loyal to the US that was based in the area attempting to become West Virginia. That group then voted to allow West Virginia to seceded from Virginia and join the US as a new state.

    Comment by RockNTheFreeWorld — July 27, 2008 @ 4:00 pm

  35. [...] constituents. Historical examples of attempted intra-state secession include the State of Franklin, Absaroka, and of course the counter-secession statelets of the Free States of Jones and Winston (yes, the [...]

    Pingback by If At First You Don’t Secede II — July 27, 2008 @ 5:00 pm

  36. As a norwegian, I become a little proud getting to know that our great King Haakon the 7th visited this more or less forgotten state. =)

    Comment by Anders Aalbu — July 27, 2008 @ 9:36 pm

  37. Strangemaps never ceases to amaze me. Do you have anything on Waldseemuller?

    Comment by Nestor the Chronicler — July 28, 2008 @ 6:21 am

  38. Reminds me of Transnistria, the county that barely exists…
    http://cool-maps.blogspot.com/2008/07/transnistria-county-that-barely-exists.html

    Comment by Björn — July 28, 2008 @ 11:40 am

  39. And that area is *still* neo-conservative……..

    Comment by bourgoise pig — July 28, 2008 @ 2:17 pm

  40. @ Björn (#38)

    Transnistria really should merge with Moldava, which in turn should merge with Romania. Why stay with 3rd world country called Russia when your country can join the EU?

    Comment by bourgoise pig — July 28, 2008 @ 2:21 pm

  41. I grew up in Berkshire County, the westernmost county of Massachusetts. Because it’s at the westernmost reaches of the commonwealth, Berkshire county tends to be ignored by Boston, which happens to be situated at the eastern end of the Massachusetts. Once every decade or so, this state of affairs angers the residents of Berkshire county enough to produce grumblings (of varying seriousness) of seceding to Vermont. Nothing, of course, has ever come of it, but there’s no reason why it couldn’t.

    Comment by Terry — July 28, 2008 @ 6:00 pm

  42. [...] StrangeMaps In its short-lived attempt at existence, the US state of Absaroka (pronounced ab-SOR-ka) managed to [...]

    Pingback by Absaroka — July 28, 2008 @ 10:18 pm

  43. There was some discussion a few years back in the North Dakota legislature about changing the states name to just “Dakota” in an effort to boost tourism. Appartently “north” connotes cold. Anyway, when questioned about the proposal a South Dakota legislator said something like “they can call it South Saskatchewan for all I care”.

    I drove through Absaroka a few years back. Beautiful prairie, weird people. The folks in Gillette were WILD. Drinking, carrousing, and general carrying on. The dudes running the gas station were scary cowboy jerks. Grass Lodge was like a slice of South Central LA on the lonesome prairie.

    Comment by Cod Liver Oil — July 28, 2008 @ 10:54 pm

  44. Counties that never made it are very common. The Pennsylvania State Archives has maps for many of these proposed counties, one of which was actually created by legislation, but vetoed by the Governor.

    Comment by J. B. Post — July 29, 2008 @ 1:10 am

  45. holy $hit your blog is fucking amazing!!!

    Comment by TBMK — July 29, 2008 @ 1:32 am

  46. check out the book “lost states” for a bunch of cool stories like this one.

    Comment by jb — July 29, 2008 @ 3:24 am

  47. Several years ago, pre-Sagebrush Rebellion, the folks in the panhandle of Nebraska were unhappy — long distance to the capital on the other side of the state, not enough attention paid to local roads, etc., etc. They talked of secession. The legislature of Wyoming was in session, and announced they’d be happy to take those counties into Wyoming (check the map with this post; you can see the possibilities).

    The whole affair sort of deflated when some rancher got up at a meeting and asked, innocently but sincerely, “Do we really want to go from being the panhandle of Nebraska, to being the panhandle of Wyoming?”

    CBS Evening News covered the story on September 7, 1973:
    http://openweb.tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/1973-9/1973-09-07-CBS-18.html

    Comment by Ed Darrell — July 29, 2008 @ 8:20 am

  48. I’d be a proud Absarokan if the statehood movement had succeeded…born in Lovell, Wyoming. I’d love to own one of those license plates. If anybody knows where I could find one, please let me know.

    Comment by Tawn Gorbutt — July 31, 2008 @ 5:14 pm

  49. +100. Respect. ;)

    Comment by funnygirl — August 7, 2008 @ 1:20 pm

  50. this a real map?

    Comment by stilllway — August 30, 2008 @ 5:58 pm

  51. at least then people would have known how to pronounce “Abzorka.” It’s still the name of a major mountain range you go through to get to Yellowstone. Right up there with Popo Agie = Popo zja. Crow is a bitch on the eyes.

    Yes I am from Absaroka or there is no chance in hell I would know this stuff…

    Comment by Marissa Smith — September 7, 2008 @ 2:04 am

  52. [...] there was once a state in the US that never quite made it to official status? Check out the map of Absaroka. Or how about a view of cannibalism throughout history? Didn’t know that map existed, did [...]

    Pingback by Scribble On The Wall » Map It! — September 18, 2008 @ 3:50 pm

  53. I cannot speak for Wyoming and Montana, but I can verify that Western and Eastern South Dakota are only bound together by the map. Even within the state, it is common to refer to “West River” and “East River”, referring to the Missouri.

    South Dakota makes the transition from Minnesota (prairie, populated by liberals and farmers) to Wyoming (mountains, populated by conservatives and ranchers) in the space of a mere 400 miles.

    Absaroka would be welcomed by most of the population of West River!

    Comment by Brother Beaker — September 25, 2008 @ 10:37 pm

  54. Just to follow-up on #9, 11, 34:

    Maine was an integral part of the Colony and State of Massachusetts Bay until its separation as a state. It was formed by numerous settlements that were annexed by Massachusetts, and governed from the Massachusetts legislature. Some vestiges of this relationship remain: the Bowdoin College charter was granted by Massachusetts (hence the first building was Massachusetts Hall), and in fact there was dispute over whether the new Maine legislature had authority over Bowdoin when the Maine Act was passed. In addition, Maine & Mass. are the only two states to celebrate “Patriot Day”, dating from prior to separation.

    Comment by Matthew — October 5, 2008 @ 1:48 am

  55. I have a license plate from ABSAROKA. Any value?

    Comment by Jan Sroka — October 6, 2008 @ 1:02 pm

  56. [...] on the internet: Strange Maps. Whether it is talking about the almost-but-never-was state of Absorka or 1942 plans for the New World Order, this blog offers me hours of [...]

    Pingback by Booyor’s BLOGgh! » I love maps — November 7, 2008 @ 1:50 am

  57. The comment made by Brother Beaker is true for most of the plains states. In ND/SD/NE, most of the population is near the eastern border, in a farming/midwestern region, versus the “western” attitude of the ranchers, miners, and oil drillers. Interestingly enough, the map seems to exclude half of west river, and likely includes the Black Hills (and a little west) due to closer ties with Sheridan. Why parts of western ND aren’t in there is uncertain; the exclusion of NE seems to be more due to a desire to shed Cheyenne & Laramie (along with the Mormons in the SE). Given the seccession movement centered in Wyoming (and you have to spend time out there to really appreciate the wide-open spaces of eastern Wyoming), it’s probably best understood as the unhappiness in the smaller populated portion of any state: those people in Cheyenne take our money and never listen. Perhaps the folks excluded Billings for that reason (though at the time, Billings was not much bigger than Sheridan, and the map includes Rapid City, also larger than Sheridan.)
    Absorka would have made a certain amount of sense as a state (well, certainly a larger version of it), but when these states were created (ND, SD,MT, WY, ID & WA), at roughly the same time, I’m sure that populatution constraints were part of the reason for say ND & SD instead of ED & WD. The rest of Wyoming would have been pretty population challenged too, though Absorka would now easily be the smallest state.
    One final point; As someone else pointed out, the state would have included the Crow (the Absorka) and some of their historic enemies (the Lakota, and the Cheyenne). You do have to wonder how the Lakota, the westernmost of the Lakota/Nakota/Dakota, and the Cheyenne would have regarded the name. The more recent “Republic of Lakotah”, which would include Absorka east of the Bighorns and other parts of ND & NE as described in the 1851 Ft Laramie treaty (not to be confused with the 1868 treaty), was proclaimed by various Lakota leaders and is so named due to their contention that all of the territory (including that currently held by the Crow and the Cheyenne) is Lakota territory.

    Comment by j — December 5, 2008 @ 4:03 am

  58. thanks

    Comment by الوليد — December 16, 2008 @ 8:15 pm

  59. thank you

    Comment by Tony — May 4, 2009 @ 3:45 am

  60. thanks for this map
    good 
    luck

    ….

    Comment by Solomon — May 11, 2009 @ 9:01 am

  61. merci

    Comment by aspicco . — May 17, 2009 @ 6:43 am

  62. Vielen Dank

    Comment by moon — July 3, 2009 @ 5:19 am

  63. Muchas gracias

    Comment by sun — July 4, 2009 @ 7:42 am

  64. Surely your spam filters should have caught it — you’re being spammed by aspicco, moon and sun.

    Comment by Ed Darrell — July 4, 2009 @ 1:40 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.