
What a great way this map is to present global levels of wine consumption (red wine, 2006). A shame there’s no legend to provide context (by way of litres consumed per country, a ranking and a bit of explanation).
Why did the Luxembourgers consume such an inordinate amount of red wine in 2006? Was it the Grand Duke’s jubilee, perhaps? Or did the local, tiny wine industry have a bumper crop in 2005? And why is Brazil so tiny by comparison? Doesn’t the South American giant have a wine industry of its own? Or at least a wine-drinking culture – it’s hard to imagine the laid-back Brazilians not having one.
But what do those numbers mean? If this is litres per head per year, then those Luxembourgers haven’t exactly been swilling in the stuff, and the 0,17 litres ingested by the Brazilians suggests far too much sobriety than they can be suspected of.
All this graph/map teaches us, therefore, is relative wine consumption. Apart from the aforementioned Grand-Ducals (who seem to be world champions), other red wine aficionados appear to be the French (unsurprisingly), the Italians (also no shock there), followed by the Portuguese, the Swiss (bet you didn’t think of them), the Croatians, the Spanish, the Danish, the Austrians, the Greeks, the Argentinians, the Georgians (the Sakartvelo kind obviously, not those of Atlanta and environs) and the Hungarians.
Left behind by a whole slew of middle-tier red wine consumers are tiny drinkers such as the Polish, Paraguayans, Russians, Bosnians, Japanese, Lebanese, Estonians, Israelis and Kazakhs. Some of the more striking conclusions:
- red wine consumption can vary hugely between neighbouring countries. Paraguay is a tiny consumer, Uruguay a huge one. Maybe the latter has a wine industry while the former hasn’t?
- then again, Chile has a well-known viticultural sector, but is a tiny consumer. Maybe because all the stuff is exported? Other countries with a history of, or at least the appropriate climate for wine-growing are also conspicuously small consumers.
- Germany is a huge wine country, but an average red wine consumer. Do Germans prefer the white variety?
- Low red wine consumption should not be equated by low alcohol consumption per se. Local alcoholic drinks might simply have a bigger hold on the market. Russia, for example, consumes a tiny amount of red wine per capita. Which cannot be said of the amount of wodka.
A final note on the sonorous quality of the Portuguese language. Doesn’t Cazaquistao sound fantastically exotic, and even more so than Kazakhstan already does? Portuguese, the other Iberian language, is dwarfed by Spanish, which has 350 million speakers worldwide. That is not to say that Portuguese isn’t a world language in its own right, both in numbers (190 to 230 million, largely thanks to Brazil’s 196 million) and global reach (the Lusophone community numbers 8 countries on 4 continents, among which the world’s second-newest nation, East Timor).
Many thanks to Brazilian graphic designer Alexandre Suannes for sending in this map, which he produced for Expand, a wine producer/importer in Brazil.


AFAIK, the best wines in Germany are white ones, so it’s not a surprise that they are moderate consumers of red wine. Chile is more startling, at least for me… and Luxembourg too! I would have supposed they liked beer more…
Comment by .mau. — April 27, 2009 @ 9:26 am
Such a high consumption in Luxemburg could be explained by the fact that alcohol (as well as tobacco, oil, DVD-R….) have a very low taxation rate compared to France (and I assume, Germany).
So many foreign neighbors will go in Luxemburg to buy a few (or a few dozens) bottles once in a while.
Difference with cigarettes: selling wine is a real job, it requires knowledge and specific storage environment. I don’t know if there are good wine dealers there but if there is, it definitely explains why Luxemburg is ranked #1.
Comment by JP — April 27, 2009 @ 9:29 am
“Spanish, which has 350 speakers worldwide”
I think you may have made a typo there.
Comment by Randall — April 27, 2009 @ 9:32 am
My favourite Portuguese names are Quirguistao (capital: Bisqueque)and the city of Banguecoque.
Comment by Paolo — April 27, 2009 @ 9:47 am
Yugoslavia, in 2006? wth.
Comment by John Drinkwater — April 27, 2009 @ 9:54 am
Luxembourg grows nearly no red wine, so we’re not selling our own production. But the taxes explain a lot of the consumption, but Luxembourgers like to drink wine, too.
Comment by Joël — April 27, 2009 @ 9:58 am
“…consumption can vary hugely between neighbouring countries. Paraguay is a tiny consumer, Uruguay a huge one.”
Er, this is a map blog? Sure, they’re close, but NOT neighboring, or even neighboUring, whatever that is. ;)
Fascinating stuff regardless.
Comment by J — April 27, 2009 @ 10:04 am
@ Randall (#3):
350 speakers would be a bit on the low side, thanks for pointing it out.
@ John Drinkwater (#5):
Slovenia, Bosnia and Croatia are marked separately; ‘Yugoslavia’ will refer to the Serb-Montenegrin federation, also known as rump-Yugoslavia, which has since also been disbanded.
@ J (#7):
I don’t think countries need to be bordering each other in order to be neighbouring…
Comment by strangemaps — April 27, 2009 @ 10:35 am
[...] Read it. [...]
Pingback by DYSPEPSIA GENERATION » Blog Archive » Planet of the Grapes — April 27, 2009 @ 10:44 am
Uruguay has a big and high-quality wine industry, sadly little known in Europe or the US. It will probably end up following Chile and Argentina’s examples and becoming better known in the wider world.
Comment by noisms — April 27, 2009 @ 11:04 am
This is pushing the definition of “map.” This even pushes the envelope of “cartogram” where space on the map represents something other than space in the world. A graphic display of information, yes, but a map?
Comment by J. B. Post — April 27, 2009 @ 11:12 am
Luxembourg and Switzerland both have huge Portuguese communities, and that may explain a lot about their surprising results. As for the Brazilian, their drink of choice seems to be beer.
Comment by Rita — April 27, 2009 @ 11:24 am
Uraguay has a large population of Italian extraction; Paraguay does not.
Comment by ShariEllen — April 27, 2009 @ 11:33 am
Red wine consumption may also be an indicator of wealth. Luxembourg’s population is relatively well-off, so nearly everyone in the country can afford to drink wine (especially with the abovementioned lack of tax). Brazil, on the other hand, has a huge contingent of people below the poverty line, who would certainly not be purchasing wine. This would mean that if the consumption figures are in litres per capita, it’s not really that surprising. The numbers would make more sense if you compared them to “number of people who can afford wine at all.”
Comment by Valarie — April 27, 2009 @ 11:50 am
Red wine consumption may also be an indicator of wealth. Luxembourg’s population is relatively well-off, so nearly everyone in the country can afford to drink wine (especially with the abovementioned lack of tax). Brazil, on the other hand, has a huge contingent of people below the poverty line, who would certainly not be purchasing wine. This would mean that if the consumption figures are in litres per capita, it’s not really that surprising. The numbers would make more sense if you compared them to “number of people who can afford wine at all.”
And I agree, this is not a map, but graphs are fun too!
Comment by Valarie — April 27, 2009 @ 11:57 am
[...] Planet of the Grapes — A wine map of the world, for you fans of alternative cartography. Not to mention oenophiles. (You know who you are.) [...]
Pingback by [links] Link salad saddles up for the Omaha trail drive | jlake.com — April 27, 2009 @ 12:25 pm
it doesn’t really make sense to read this exclusively culturally (ie. brazil should be higher, don’t south americans drink wine). Look at a comparable chart of GDP/capita and you’ll see that there’s a corelation between the countries with high gdp/capita and wine consumption/capita. The cultural factor and the having a wine industry in the country will obviously help (brazil doesn’t), but it seems to be a product as much as anything of income – hence south africa (as far as i can see) is very small/not there. Brazil is small bc most people can’t afford to drink much wine while they can in switzerland, uruguay, and luxembourg.
the real question is why is the US so small? I thought they’d started consuming lots more wine/capita…
Comment by jacob — April 27, 2009 @ 1:50 pm
”Portuguese, the other Iberian language,”
I would like to remind you that there are at least FIVE Iberian languages:
*Spanish (Castilian Spanish)
*Portuguese
*Catalan
*Basque
*Galician
(Some even consider ’aranés’, ’aragonés’ and ’asturleonés’ indpendent langs [while others think they’re dialects].)
You really should modify that sentence… :-)
Comment by Bjørn A. Bojesen — April 27, 2009 @ 2:02 pm
“Lusofonia” – Portuguese speaking countries: Portugal, Angola, Brazil, Cape Verde, Guinea Bissau, Macau, Mozambique, Sao Tome and Principe, East Timor.
Comment by Davide Alpestana — April 27, 2009 @ 2:37 pm
I don’t see the U.S. How do we compare?
Comment by Patrick — April 27, 2009 @ 3:31 pm
Having lived in Brazil for 9 months already, I can say that beer here is the king, the queen and most of the rest of the court, with cachaca (a rum-type drink made of sugar cane) coming second. Brazilians generally pride themselves as producing good wine; however, the most popular one is Gato Negro (Black Cat) which could more adequately be described as sugar dissolved in water with some wine flavor in it. There exist some really good wines, especially in the south (the states of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Caterina and Parana) which has been colonized heavily by italians, but these wines are not widespread in the rest of Brazil.
Another comment hinted on pretty widespread poverty as the cause of low wine consumption — and I think that’s right, wine is not that cheap here, especially when compared with beer.
Comment by Tibi — April 27, 2009 @ 3:37 pm
Now to have a real Brazilian commenting…
I wholeheartedly agree with Valarie, jacob and Tibi’s comments (respectively #14, 17 and 21 above). Poverty is a strong reason, and there is a pride about exporting fine red wine, but the drink of choice really is beer — specifically lager, under 5% alcohol.
Complementing Bjorn Bojesen’s comment (#18), there are still Valenciano (sometimes regarded as a dialect to Catalan, but still independent) and Mirandês, which is spoken in a faroff portion of Portugal.
Comment by João Paulo Cursino — April 27, 2009 @ 4:34 pm
Patrick @ 20:
The United States (“Estados Unidos”) is on the right-hand side, next to Italia at about the 4:00 position. It looks like the U.S. is in the same league with Canada, South Africa, and Azerbaijan (a Muslim-majority country!) and a bit smaller than Ireland.
Comment by Dennis Brennan — April 27, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
In the south of Brazil, there are a good wine production. Despite of that, I believe that Brazilian’s low relative wine consumption is caused by wine-drinking culture. In fact, it’s not common to consume wine in our country.
Comment by Santaum — April 27, 2009 @ 4:58 pm
Beer is king in Brazil. Anheuser-Busch InBev is the largest brewer in the world, and despite having global headquarters in Belgium, is run by Brazilians.
Comment by Vincent Clement — April 27, 2009 @ 5:14 pm
It’s surprising to see these muslim countries appearing (even being the tiny grapes) in the list. Morocco? Kazakhstan? Perhaps this is the amount of wine consumed by the tourists… but these aren’t such popular countries to visit.
Mumble-mumble…
Comment by Anboto — April 27, 2009 @ 5:35 pm
This ‘map’ has a serious (and common) dimensionality flaw. If we take the key to mean some sort of proportion between Luxembourg and Brazil, it suggests that the proportion is about 34.7 to 1.
Unfortunately, this is conveyed in the -radius- of the circles. So the Brazil circle appears not 34.7 times smaller, but more like several hundred times smaller.
Worse yet, these circles are representing three dimensional grapes. A grape that is 34.7 times larger than another grape of the same proportions has a radius that’s a mere 3.3 times larger.
Other than that, this ‘map’ is acceptably botryoidal.
Comment by Oliver X — April 27, 2009 @ 5:48 pm
Cool map.
I really enjoy this blog, but whenever I read the comments I am shocked by how pedantic some people can get.
Comment by mr — April 27, 2009 @ 7:03 pm
Even when the maps aren’t all that great, this is still SUCH an educational blog. Nothing else tonight could have prompted me to google a political map of South America to check the relative positions of Paraguay and Uruguay for myself.
I’m reminded of a “Simpsons” episode when Homer points at the map and says “Look at this country: U R Gay” (or words to that effect)
Keep it up Strangemaps!
Comment by Pat — April 27, 2009 @ 8:00 pm
Seriously, are we going to get into arguing the intricacies of this map? Besides, if you read the legend it cleary states that the consumption is based on liters per capita of red wine. Brazil has the lowest red wine consumption per capita, end of story. If you want exact numbers put the data in a table.
Comment by hdawg — April 27, 2009 @ 8:33 pm
I think the difference between Paraguay and Uruguay comes from three facts:
1. Uruguay has almost five times more GDP per capita than Paraguay (10k to 2,5k US dollars per year, aprox), and as many already said, wine is a quite expensive drink (at least in non-producing countries).
2. Uruguay’s mediterranean to continental climate makes it far more suitable for producing wine than Paraguay’s tropical to subtropical.
3. The overwhealming majority of Uruguayans descend from early XXth century migration from Italy and Spain (strong wine drinking countries), while Paraguayans are mostly a mix of many centuries between Europeans and Guaraní Indians.
@Randall: The actual number of Spanish native speakers worldwide may be a bit higher, slightly above 400 million; I guess that estimation is a bit old.
Comment by José Carlos — April 27, 2009 @ 8:43 pm
[...] GuteSeiten. Außerdem ist Luxemburg mal wieder Weltmeister, bei etwas, was wir richtig gut können: Rotwein saufen. (Jaja, Tankstellenverkäufe, ich [...]
Pingback by Fireball’s Weblog - (enjoying the postapocalypse) » Blog Archive » Watchtower (III) — April 27, 2009 @ 8:59 pm
@Anboto: Morocco is a popular tourist destination for Europeans.
Another factor pushing Luxembourg the table (apart from wealth: you can’t spell Luxembourgeois without bourgeois) is the number of international organisations with HQs there (EU and others). For a small country, it’s a significant part of the economy, and all the foreigners coming for conferences expect to be wined and dined and wined some more at the end of a day’s negotiations.
Comment by mollymooly — April 27, 2009 @ 11:41 pm
[...] Strange Maps has posted a great infographic showing relative wine consumption by country in 2006. [...]
Pingback by Wine Consumption 2006 | DailyViz — April 28, 2009 @ 12:04 am
I’m impressed with little Croatia’s contribution to worldwide consumption totals – and I think I learned more about the map from people’s comments than from the map itself – but hey that’s what is all about!
areg
Comment by areg — April 28, 2009 @ 12:47 am
Many correct assertions above, but the key reasons for this are cultural.
To wit, South Africa is one of the top-ten wine (yes, red wine, too!) producing and exporting countries in the world. Yet they drink practically none. They drink beer and liquor much like their caucasian forebears, the Dutch. Portugal, another small country with a comparatively massive production, consumes their native products aplenty; it’s in their centuries of vinified history.
Look, however to South America, and the landscape completely changes. As Jose at 31 noted, cultures with large wine-consuming European immigrant populations, like Chile and Argentina with their heavy Spanish and Italian immigrants, helped the wine industry flourish (even if in doing so they served as veritable indentured servants).
Lastly, while it is generally true that beer is less expensive than wine, this typically is not considered a major factor over culture. Many countries in both the New and Old World– say, Argentina or Italy — have plentiful, cheap wine that is nonetheless quite good. (It tends to be locally produced and consumed, especially in Italy where many rural homes have two casks — one for olive oil and the other for wine.)
Australia is perpetually in or near the top 5 in production year after year, yet their consumption remains comparatively small. And Australia is, while not rich, far from impoverished. Their consumption is askew their production.
The great story of wine is people, heritage and migration more than money per se.
Comment by Michael — April 28, 2009 @ 12:59 am
Great post! This is really interesting. A lot of interesting comments, too.
Comment by George — April 28, 2009 @ 1:23 am
Germany’s domestic whites are outstanding — Mosel, Rhine — they keep the good stuff home, too, and don’t export it. So they would be average red consumers — the whites are wonderful and keep them busy.
Comment by Scorpio — April 28, 2009 @ 1:47 am
@Scorpio: Alas, the world still suffers from a misconception that German whites are sweet, abetted in no small part by massively confusing wine laws and resulting labeling. (And it’s further complicated by a lack of proper education / service of wines that aren’t fully dry.)
Comment by Michael — April 28, 2009 @ 2:48 am
I see a massive error between two figures: here, New Zealand is shown consuming one liter per capita in 2006. However, domestic sales of NZ wine was 50 million liters (to a population of 4 million). This doesn’t even include imported wine.
The difference is an order of magnitude!
Comment by LL — April 28, 2009 @ 3:09 am
Maybe this is a map representing the consuption of red Portugese wine.
Comment by mare — April 28, 2009 @ 5:55 am
Unless you count Serbia and Montenegro separating into as two “new” nations, Timor-Leste is the newest nation in the world right now.
and speaking of Serbia, anyone else notice “Yugoslavia” on this map?
Comment by nemt — April 28, 2009 @ 4:12 pm
well, its the consuption per capta (person) the tiny and “rich” population of Luxemburg may explain this too, the brazilian population is huge, and most of it is poor, so the consuption of wine is lower.
The most consumed acohol beverage is beer here(in Brazil), wine is considered too expensive (although we have really cheap ones too, but the quality is poor)
Comment by roboto — April 28, 2009 @ 4:23 pm
Not only the map shows Yugoslavia (WTF?), but misspells the names of several countries: Latvia, Marroco, Croatia, Uruguay, Paraguay, Slovakia and Moldova.
In brazilian portuguese, those countries names should be written: Letônia, Marrocos, Croácia, Uruguai, Paraguai, Eslováquia e Moldávia.
Weird, dude!
Comment by tiago landi — April 28, 2009 @ 4:34 pm
Forgot to mention:
Wine ain’t that expensive in Brazil. You can get a bottle for the price of a beer in almost any shop around here.
Good wine is expensive, but, well, isn’t that everywhere?
Brazilians just don’t have the habit of drinking wine.
Comment by tiago landi — April 28, 2009 @ 4:37 pm
Oh, and yes, sorry for being so pedantic. LOL.
Comment by tiago landi — April 28, 2009 @ 4:44 pm
thanks to its former colonies, Portugal’s language is a huge player in global music.
Comment by sm — April 28, 2009 @ 5:01 pm
uruguay has no borders with paraguay……brazil and argentina are between them!
Comment by Rafael França — April 28, 2009 @ 5:50 pm
[...] 377 – Planet of the Grapes « Strange Maps reading this while drinking a glass of Refošk (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refosk) [...]
Pingback by igorbrejc.net » Fresh Catch For April 29th — April 29, 2009 @ 5:02 am
[...] źródło: strangemaps.wordpress.com [...]
Pingback by Consumo per capita | TO.BE-Advertising — April 29, 2009 @ 2:41 pm
[...] Found at… Tags: grapes, graph, information graphics, maps, Wine Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. [...]
Pingback by Fun presentation of dry (well wet) facts | Boxer Design - SoakitUp™ — April 29, 2009 @ 3:14 pm
Funny map, but with some strange things for the ones who, like me, speak Portuguese:
-Croatia, Latvia and Moldova are not written correctly (it would be Croácia, Letônia and Moldávia)
-Uruguay and Paraguay, for us, are written with ‘I’ instead of ‘Y’ in the end.
And about our (Brazillian) little consumption of wine, three reasons. 1) Most of the country is too hot for drinking wine. 2) A wine that is not that bad is still very expensive, and as everyone knows, we’re not that rich (and that’s not because we’re ‘lazy-back’, ok? rsrsrs) 3) Our wine industry is still developing.
Comment by Gabriel Pimenta — April 29, 2009 @ 3:15 pm
From a statisticians point of view this graphical representation of data (I agree: this is not a map) is useless.
How is the per-capita consumption calculated? Was it just amount of red wine sold divided by population? If so, then it wouldn’t take into account the differences among countries in the age-distribution of the populations (for example, Uganda has a median age of 15; Moracco a median age of 46) and the drinking-age. Or how strict the drinking age is enforced.
Or is it a per-eligible-to-drink-capita?
Interestingly enough, according to wikipedia, Uganda has the youngest population and also the highest alcohol consumption per-capita.
Comment by Daniel — April 30, 2009 @ 12:14 pm
[...] van 32%. Maar goed, het is mooi… Wijnconsumptie per capita01-05-2009 om 13:45 door Carlos Aansprekende infograph: wijnconsumptie per capita Infographics, Waan v/d Dag, wijn Terug naar het [...]
Pingback by Wijnconsumptie per capita - Sargasso — May 1, 2009 @ 11:45 am
Nothing beats the Portuguese “THE” They really make sentences sound exclamatory. O! A! O SENHOR!!! A SENHORA!!! O!!! A!!! O!!! A!!! A!!!! OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! I’M CUMMING!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
Comment by OH SENWHORE!!! OR WAS IT senYor? — May 1, 2009 @ 5:17 pm
Thank you for the usefull article.
Comment by My Produksiyon — May 1, 2009 @ 8:10 pm
I’m from South of Brazil, and this is a region of wine production. However, the quality is really low comparing with the wine from Chile, Argentina an Uruguay.
Peronally, I just drink imported wine, the price is almost the same of a local one, but the quality is much better.
Anyway, the beer drinking are in large advantage.
Comment by Francisco — May 2, 2009 @ 4:48 am
Well this map does have a legend. It is in liters of wine consumed per person per year. And we have the numbers for both Brazil and Luxemburg. ;)
Comment by Rafael — May 4, 2009 @ 12:37 am
Thank you
Comment by Tony — May 4, 2009 @ 3:50 am
Anboto @26
Kazakhstan actually has a local wine industry in the southeast of the country. There is also quite a large community living in the country that has origins in Georgia, Armenia and other Caucasus wine-drinking regions.
Much like the commenters on Brazil, I think the low wine consumption is due to poverty and a preference for beer and hard alcohol (specifically vodka, but a lot of the wine production ends up as cognac as well). And the levels of tourists notwithstanding, much of the Kazakhstani population will drink at least occasionally, regardless of religious background.
Comment by Kochevnik — May 5, 2009 @ 1:46 pm
Something is wrong with this fideszközeli hehehe GRAPh, I checked the data for ALL wine consumption in Hungary, and they are 32-35 litres/capita. From the graph we can see about 3-4 l/capita for RED wine.
Comment by Pali Szabo — May 7, 2009 @ 3:58 pm
[...] friend of mine sent me a link to a map of per capita wine consumption in the world in 2006. I thought it was fun, so I’m [...]
Pingback by Why Luxembourg rocks: Map of world’s per capita wine consumption — WineEnabler.com — May 7, 2009 @ 7:32 pm
I´m from Brazil, and a drink at least one bottle per month of a good wine. Spanish and portuguese wines are my favourites.
But, I’d rather drink beer, as the majority of brazilian people.
Cachaça is the second one, not vodka or whiskie.
BTW, Gato Negro is a chilean wine, not brazilian. We don´t have good ones here.
Comment by Eduardo Wagner — May 12, 2009 @ 7:29 pm
Hi, I’m for Belgium.
I beleive this map is based on sales, not consumption.
Luxembourg is surrounded by Germany, france and Belgium. Because of lower taxes in Luxembourg, many nearby foreigners go shopping in Luxembourg. Same for fuel & cigarettes.
Comment by fujisan — May 16, 2009 @ 5:43 am
[...] Planet of the Grapes : [...]
Pingback by Les petites choses utiles du mardi, vol. 96 | Boîte noire — May 19, 2009 @ 5:02 am
Cool map.
I really enjoy this blog, but whenever I read the comments I am shocked by how pedantic some people can get.
Comment by world cities — June 1, 2009 @ 5:25 pm
[...] Planeta das uvas – um mapa estilizado da produção de uvas no mundo; [...]
Pingback by GeoLinks da semana | Cartotech Brasil — June 2, 2009 @ 12:24 pm
[...] unregelmäßigen Abständen ebensolche präsentiert. Passend zu diesem Genießerblog habe ich ein Beispiel gewählt, das zwar weniger eine Karte ist, dafür aber umso mehr mit genießen zu tun hat. [...]
Pingback by Seltsame Karten » Tierleichenteile - Das Kochblog — June 3, 2009 @ 8:48 pm
[...] 377 Planet of the Grapes Strange Maps Posted by root 15 minutes ago (http://strangemaps.wordpress.com) Another comment hinted on pretty widespread poverty as the cause of low wine strange maps has posted a great infographic showing relative wine r d o strangemaps wordpress com pingback by consumo per capita to among countries in the age distribution of the Discuss | Bury | News | 377 Planet of the Grapes Strange Maps [...]
Pingback by 377 Planet of the Grapes Strange Maps | Cellulite Creams — June 9, 2009 @ 2:41 am
i believe that this cartogram is representing consumption of portuguese vinho tinto specifically, not all red wine.
Comment by jason — June 12, 2009 @ 10:49 pm
@Comment #70 – No, this is indeed accurate, and represents per capita consumption of ALL sorts of red wines in each of these countries. However, as comment #64 accurately states, this is probably a figure of per capita consumption based on gross sales in each country.
The disproportionately large figure for Luxembourg is probably the result of its tax status, and liquor sales.
In Belgium and Germany (Belgica and Alemania),where beer is more popular, the per capita wine sales for are very close, and are probably a more accurate representation of the true per capita wine consumption of the Luxembourgers.
Comment by Drew — June 16, 2009 @ 10:42 pm
[...] I encountered on Carpe Diem an alcohol consumption map. And here’s one that looks at the world through consumption of wine. [...]
Pingback by Are we there yet? « Capillary Refill: Old Blood, New Perfusion — June 20, 2009 @ 5:28 pm
Chile used to consume significantly more wine per capita before the economic crises of the 1960s and 70s. When times got hard, people turned to a brandy called “pisco” which is very cheap, and pisco replaced wine as the national drink of choice.
Comment by nero42 — June 22, 2009 @ 3:50 am
It is really interesting :/
Comment by Deltaweb, tr.gg, html kodları — June 30, 2009 @ 4:27 pm
i love your website! great posts.
does anyone know if this map is available for sale anywhere?
Comment by Lauren — July 1, 2009 @ 2:12 pm
#18
you forgot Mirandês :), Portugal second official language
Comment by Ricardo Reis — July 3, 2009 @ 7:49 am
Ref the ongoing arguments between sales vs consumption, unless you follow every person home from the shops to see if they drink the wine themselves or give it away, you have to use the data for sales…!
and as for neighboUring countries(with a U, it was our language first), I’d say Paraguay and Uruguay were in the same neighbourhood, eg South America. Just as all the people who live in my street and those surrounding it are my “neighbours”, whether I share a wall with them or not…
Comment by Andrea Flowers — July 17, 2009 @ 3:09 pm
Hello to you all, I’m the designer who’s done this map. I offer my apologies for some inaccuracy — specially linguistic ! —but the simple purpose of this piece was to present dull information in an interesting way. The data regarding the consumption — litres per capita, or total of liters produced dived by population — was provided by the client, by an international wine producers association.
…
Tanks to all the comments.
Comment by Alexandre Suannes — August 1, 2009 @ 4:31 pm
[...] via http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/377-planet-of-the-grapes/ [...]
Pingback by 377 - Planet of the Grapes « Strange Maps at WEMAKECHANGES — August 2, 2009 @ 7:08 pm
[...] via http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/377-planet-of-the-grapes/ [...]
Pingback by crabe.ru » 377 - Planet of the Grapes « Strange Maps — August 2, 2009 @ 8:35 pm
Some of these are odd cases of culture sort of cryogenically freezing climate factors. One of the big deciders of whether a European culture favors wine or beer for a cheap, steady drink is whether the climate is good for wine grapes; if so, there tends to be a preference for wine. In warm climates wine is for getting drunk and beer is a snack; in cold climates beer is for getting drunk and wine is a dessert.
Add hegemony by someone who uses a different beverage to drink socially and things change, though. The long, arduous process of developing vines for the cold German climate would never have happened (and as such wine in Europe would stop at the Rhone and Danube) if rich, militarily secure Roman colonists hadn’t had a powerful thirst for the stuff. Similarly, even though Brazil is an ideal country for wine and its high culture is enthusiastically oenophilic, because first the UK and then the US (two beer cultures) have spent its entire modern history being their main trading partners, beer has taken root.
(Part of that might also be the fact that, unlike Uruguay or the other SA wine-drinking societies, Brazil hosts a lot of rum production – there’s always been a cheap drink to fall back on if wine got expensive, so there didn’t exist a market pressure towards cheap wines.)
Comment by alec — August 21, 2009 @ 11:37 pm
What are the health benefits of drinking red wine?…
The initial research on the health benefits of drinking red wine is promising. Red wine has been shown to raise the HDL or good cholesterol as well as mitigate damage cause by high levels of LDL or bad cholesterol. Red wine also helps prevent the forma…
Trackback by Buy Italian Red Wines — August 26, 2009 @ 7:59 pm
[...] ábrázolva, 2006-os adatok alapján, Hungaria is rajta van, elég előkelő helyen: (via Strange Maps) 2009. szeptember 21. 7:00. | Nincs hozzászólás Kategóriák: tudomány • Cimkék: bor, [...]
Pingback by Sirubia: Mindennapi intellektuális huncutságok » A világ bortermelése térképben elmesélve — September 21, 2009 @ 6:00 pm
as i can see europeans are heavy drinkers
Comment by razvan — October 8, 2009 @ 5:46 pm
If you think reading the word Casaquistao (correctly spelled Cazaquistão in PT) is exotic, you should listen to the correct pronunciation – the ‘~’ over the 3rd ‘A’ makes a world of difference.
It’s as hard a sound to learn and integrate in common speech (if you never heard or tried to use it before) as the clicking sounds of the Bushmen. A lot of people who’ve lived in Portuguese speaking countries for decades still can’t do it properly.
Comment by Palmieres — November 10, 2009 @ 12:16 pm
Republica Checa in size like Estonia?))) 1.3 mil people drinks like 10.8 mil? Concerning certain wine traditions in Czech makes me think of strong disproportionality of such datas. Same Slovakia. They drink wine like us (czechs) but there’s still just little over 5 mil. Neihter generaly nor on head. Nice but bullshit.
Comment by Tomas Vrana — November 24, 2009 @ 11:48 pm
[...] Link [...]
Pingback by World’s Strangest | Per Capita Wine Consumption Chart — November 25, 2009 @ 12:59 am
[...] Ever wondered how Australia stacks up as a consumer of wine – we all know Australia produces good stuff… Here’s an infographic. [...]
Pingback by St. Eutychus » Winefographic — November 25, 2009 @ 7:27 am