Strange Maps

June 10, 2009

390 – “Portugal Is Not a Small Country”

Filed under: Uncategorized — strangemaps @ 10:26 pm

 portugal

Portugal, on the southwestern periphery of the European continent, is a medium-sized EU member state. Its population clocks in at 11th place out of 27 (10.59 million, in between Belgium’s 10.66 million [10] and the Czech Republic with 10.40 million [12]). Size-wise, it’s a bit further down the list: 13th (at 92.391 km2, between Hungary [12] at 93.030 km2 and Austria [14] at 83.871 km2).

Yet Portugal is loath to think of itself as a small country. Or at least it was, before its overseas empire collapsed. Built up over centuries of exploration, trade and colonisation, the Portuguese Empire once spanned four continents. The jewel in its crown was Brazil, but Portugal lost control over its South American colony in 1822.

By mid-20th century, Portugal still held on to Cape Verde, Guinea Bissau, Sao Tome & Principe, Angola, Mozambique, Macao, East Timor and its Indian possessions (Goa, Daman and Diu – three smallish footholds somewhat grandiosely labeled “Estado da India”).

As the legend to this map indicates, all these territories together added up to an area larger than (Continental) Spain, France, the UK (mislabeled “Inglaterra”), Italy and Germany put together, explaining why, as the title claims, Portugal não é um país pequeno. If that sounds a bit defensive and self-justifying, that’s no coincidence.

In the early 1970s, Portugal languished under a dictatorship determined to hold on to the vestiges of its former colonial glory. The increasingly costly and impopular wars against freedom fighters in Portuguese Africa eventually led to the overthrow of the regime, in a virtually bloodless military coup in April 1974, the so-called Revolução dos Cravos. This Carnation Revolution would lead to a swift liquidation of Portugal’s overseas assets and ultimately to democracy within Portugal. 

Portugal’s African possessions were all granted independence. Indonesia took advantage of the turmoil “back home” to take over East Timor (India had forcibly annexed Goa etcetera in 1961). Only Macao remained in Portuguese hands, until 1999, when mirrorring Hong Kong’s reversion in 1997, it was reintegrated into China. The Azores and Madeira, ethnically and geographically closest to the mother country, are still part of Portugal.

This map was sent in by Nuno D. Alves, who studied it in history class, when studying the pre-revolutionary dictatorship. “It is a propaganda map, suggesting that our country was important. Portugal’s orientation towards its colonies, away from Europe, “was used to justify the isolationism of the regime, and its neutrality in World War II (…) [The map] shows the Portuguese colonies that remained by that time superimposed on a map of Europe, going on to compare surface size with the main European countries. All in all very silly.”

Original context of the map here, at the Portuguese National Library.

PS – this map is reminiscent of another size comparison map posted earlier on this blog (#35).


45 Comments »

  1. A couple of corrections:

    By early 1970s, Portugal no longer controlled any territory in India, despite irredentist claims on the contrary by the regime. India invaded those smallish territories in 1963, prevailing easily against their tiny military garisons. The dictatorship kept demanding them back, but eventually the situation de facto became recognized de jure by Portugal, I’m not sure when, but odds are that it was after 1974.

    Also, no independence was granted to East Timor. Negotiations to that end were started, but before they reached a conclusion, Indonesia invaded the territory, starting 30 years of brutal repression. It was the de jure status of the territory as a Portuguese dependency that allowed the case for the 1999 referendum and posterior independence to be fought by Portuguese diplomats and timorese expats in the UN.

    The Macao process does not mirror that of Hong Kong. In fact, the satus of the two territories was quite diverse, since Macao was leased to the Portuguese for a period of 500 years as payment for the help the Portuguese gave a chinese ruler in fighting the pirates that infested those waters in the XV century. The territory never ceased to be chinese; it was simply under Portuguese administration until the lease ended, which happened in 1999.

    Finally, both atlantic archipelagos had been integrated into Portugal itself for a long time. Before 1974, the official terminology referred to mainland Portugal as “Portugal Continental”, i.e., continental Portugal, to the islands as “Ilhas Adjacentes”, i.e., “adjacent islands”, and to the colonies as “Províncias Ultramarinas”, i.e., “overseas provinces”. The islands were an integral part of Portugal, with the same political and administrative structure. In fact, they were then more part of Portugal than they are now, since both have gained since then the status of autonomous regions.

    Comment by Jorge — June 10, 2009 @ 10:53 pm

  2. Actually, India invaded Goa in 1961.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Vijay_(1961)

    Comment by KD — June 10, 2009 @ 11:01 pm

  3. Another actually:

    The Portugese Empire spanned FOUR continents: Europe, Asia, Africa and America.

    Comment by marisbo — June 10, 2009 @ 11:14 pm

  4. Just som random stuff I noted:

    i) The map is from pre-WWII as well as pre-Anschluss (1938), even pre-Ireland Split (1921), but post-January 1920 since the Free City of Danzig is there, and judging by the Polish-Soviet border, the Polish-Soviet War is ongoing and the borders are in their late 1920-early 1921 position.

    ii) The text for Eastern Prussia (Prussia Oriental) has been misprinted over the position of Lithuania…

    Comment by feldgrau — June 10, 2009 @ 11:20 pm

  5. Er… yes, KD is right. I mixed up two dates: 1961 was the year India invaded the Portuguese territories in the subcontinent (and also the beginning of the first colonial war, in Angola), and 1963 was the year the second of the 3 colonial wars Portugal fought for about 10 years began in Guinea-Bissau. The third one, in Mozambique, began in 64.

    Comment by Jorge — June 10, 2009 @ 11:29 pm

  6. And since I *know* you love exclaves, one of the Portuguese parts of India was an entirely landlocked crumb called Dadra and Nagar Haveli.

    The Indians actually took that in 1954, though it was folded into the rest of Portuguese India and annexed in 1961.

    http://www.indiaplaces.com/india-maps/img/dadra-nagar-haveli-01.gif

    Comment by Paul Drye — June 10, 2009 @ 11:32 pm

  7. Actually, “Inglaterra” is the (Argentine) Spanish name for England, whether or not it is the same in Portuguese I do not know. But I’m guessing that it is not a mistake.

    Comment by Scott — June 11, 2009 @ 12:06 am

  8. @ Jorge:
    Thanks for your corrections; I have amended the text to reflect most of them. Except the bit about Macao. Its peaceful reintegration into China is in my opinion sufficiently similar to Hong Kong’s to merit comparison in the limited scope of this brief description of its fate. If I’m not mistaken, Hong Kong was also leased. And both territories will retain an autonomous status within China for 50 years.

    @ KD, marisbo:
    Ditto on the corrections. Obrigado!

    @ feldgrau:
    I’m sceptical about dating the map based on its ‘borderwork’, which seems sloppy more than anything else. Notice the Black Sea and several of the large, northern Russian lakes paved over in the colour of land. Even worse, the Aral Caspian Sea’s border is only half rendered. And then there’s your own point (ii), obviously.

    @ Paul Drye:
    I do, and I had never heard of those. Thanks!

    @ Scott:
    The point is that “Inglaterra” (England) is only one part of the “Reino Unido” (United Kingdom) – common enough as a pars pro toto (also outside the UK – see Holland for the Netherlands, and formerly Russia for the Soviet Union), but still an error.

    Comment by strangemaps — June 11, 2009 @ 12:15 am

  9. @strangemaps, you mean “Caspian Sea” instead of “Aral Sea” ;)

    Comment by Roberto Bonvallet — June 11, 2009 @ 12:30 am

  10. Regarding the date, and since you provided a link to the Portuguese National Library, I performed a quick search for this map in the database, and found it. It had several editions, the earliest being in 1933.

    Comment by Jorge — June 11, 2009 @ 12:42 am

  11. To know more of the heritage legacy of the Portuguese in the world consult the website of the competition 7 Wonders of Portuguese origin in the World
    http://www.7maravilhas.sapo.pt/#/27Maravilhas/Nomeados

    Comment by Davide Alpestana — June 11, 2009 @ 3:47 am

  12. @ Roberto Bonvallet:
    Darn it. I always mix them up. Thanks, correcting.

    Comment by strangemaps — June 11, 2009 @ 7:03 am

  13. I’d just like to say I love this blog.

    Comment by Herman von Salza — June 11, 2009 @ 7:28 am

  14. Me too.

    Comment by gloep — June 11, 2009 @ 7:53 am

  15. Regarding Macao and Hong Kong, they were many similarities but still I am not sure it’s fair to say that the process “mirrored” Hong Kong’s reversion. AFAIK, the talks happened largely in parallel but started earlier and seemed less contentious regarding Macao. Hong Kong had to be handed over first because the lease of the New Territories was expiring.

    Comment by filipo — June 11, 2009 @ 8:16 am

  16. David Cerny, the artist who created “Entropa” took this same set of images in a slightly different direction: pieces of meat shaped like Mozambique, Angola and Brazil on a butcher block shaped like Portugal:

    http://poistyopoydalta.blogspot.com/2009/01/entropathe-eu-puzzleskldaka-eu.html

    Entropa would make a magnificent subject for Strange Maps

    Comment by Kevin Deegan-Krause — June 11, 2009 @ 8:26 am

  17. The spelling of Mozambique reminds me of an American woman – former colleague of mine on Hong Kong television station TVB Pearl – who was reporting on a story out of China.
    It was about out-dated money from various African countries being re-stamped with Chinese characters and passed off as real currency to yokels in the countryside in exchange for Chinese Yuan.

    I’ll never forget how she pronounced Mozambique: Mo-Kam-Beek. She’d obviously never heard of the place, and was simply mis-reading the old way the Portuguese used to spell their colony.

    Comment by ian in hamburg — June 11, 2009 @ 8:36 am

  18. So is this a case of “short country syndrome” (a la “short man syndrome”)…? ;-)

    Comment by John H — June 11, 2009 @ 9:29 am

  19. Although a great deal of care is taken these days to distinguish between ‘England’ and ‘Great Britain’ (not to mention ‘The United Kingdom’), this was not always the case, and until comparatively recently people in England/Britain would talk quite normally of ‘England’ to refer to the whole country. For example ‘The Oxford History of England’, which was first published in the 19th Century, in fact is a history of the whole British Isles; and there are many references to Queen Victoria as “The Queen of England”.

    I think the situation may be more ambiguous with ‘Holland’ and ‘The Netherlands’. A British MP caused some amusement recently when he was talking about the extremist British National Party which has just won two seats in the European Parliament, and pointed out that other European countries have similar parties, including “Holland, Austria, and The Netherlands”.

    Comment by johnrimmer — June 11, 2009 @ 11:58 am

  20. @ian in hamburg the “old way the Portuguese used to spell their colony” is actually the only spelling of the country in Portuguese language, from Mozambique to Brasil. It’s spelt “Moçambique”, being the “ç” read like “s” in “sand” or “c” in “France” (“França” in Portuguese).

    I second @Kevin Deegan-Krause suggestion ;)

    Comment by Miguel Soares — June 11, 2009 @ 2:20 pm

  21. For what it’s worth Denmark is shown with the pre-unification border to Germany. Northern Schleswig returned officially 15. June 1920, but the referendum was in 1919 and the administrative transfer began in May.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schleswig_Plebiscites

    Comment by Sili — June 11, 2009 @ 2:24 pm

  22. The map postdates the Ireland split of 1920-22, since the area given for “Inglaterra” (244734 km^2) is that of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

    Comment by mollymooly — June 11, 2009 @ 5:12 pm

  23. I visited Lisbon in 1970 and I’m sure I remember seeing propaganda posters based on this map – a map of Europe with Angola etc superimposed on it.

    Comment by Martin — June 11, 2009 @ 9:43 pm

  24. regarding what #20 says, it’s also funny that “Portugal nao e um pais pequeno” (as written in the post, instead of Portugal não é um país pequeno) means that Portugal is not “and a small parents” :P. The modification of letters not only affects the phonetic, but the meaning.

    Comment by José Carlos — June 12, 2009 @ 3:06 am

  25. Actually the New Territories were on a 99 year lease and it was this that triggered the handover. HK itself had been ceded in perpetuity and in theory need not have been handed over. Apparently when discussions first started this was the British attitude but it rapidly became clear the Chinese would have none of it. And, as they could have taken Hogn Kong any time from about the early 60s in an afternoon, that was pretty much the end of it (Britain also didn’t really want 3 million people with a claim to British protection).

    Comment by iolanthe — June 12, 2009 @ 6:08 am

  26. @ José Carlos (#24):
    Thanks for providing the necessary diacriticals, which I will now copy and paste into the main text…

    Portugal não é um país pequeno

    Comment by strangemaps — June 12, 2009 @ 10:18 am

  27. Cool that you could post it under 10th of June, since it is the Day of Portugal – officially Day of Camões, of Portugal and of the Portuguese Communities (Dia de Camões, de Portugal e das Comunidades Portuguesas).

    Comment by Nuno D. Alves — June 12, 2009 @ 11:56 am

  28. Hi Nuno,

    Thanks again for the map; the date of posting is a happy coincidence!

    Comment by strangemaps — June 12, 2009 @ 12:38 pm

  29. I noticed one thing in the map, Switzerland is written “Suissa” when the right is Suíça, its written that way in Portugal and Brazil, Im not sure about if “suíssa” is old portuguese or its wrong.

    Comment by roboto — June 12, 2009 @ 3:31 pm

  30. Jorge, the East Timorese living outside East Timor who were involved in the self-determination process were exiles, not expats.

    Returning home was not an option for them during the 24 (not 30) years of Indonesian occupation.

    Macau was redfined as a Chinese territory under Portuguese administration in 1976.

    One thing about the map is puzzling – why isn’t Portugal shaded in red, given that the colonies were supposed to be national territory?

    Comment by Ken — June 14, 2009 @ 3:11 am

  31. This is an early map of Brasil, named Terra Brasilis in the 16th Century. ://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/20/Brazil-16-map.jpg/88px-Brazil-16-map.jpg&imgrefurl=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brasil&usg=__o6rzlWIPqTu9bHittUBMEeT605g=&h=120&w=88&sz=7&hl=en&start=10&um=1&tbnid=caGarO1FZo9hxM:&tbnh=88&tbnw=65&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dselo%2Bmapa%2Bbrasil%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:pt-BR:official%26hs%3DRGU%26sa%3DG%26um%3D1

    Comment by CLisboa — June 14, 2009 @ 12:19 pm

  32. They lost Angola and won Luxemburg: a third of the population of the great duchy is portuguese…

    Comment by lp — June 14, 2009 @ 9:41 pm

  33. The area defined in the map as “Inglaterra” (England) is nowadays Great Britain, and the “Irlanda” (Ireland) area is nowadays divided into the Ireland (southern, i guess) and the UK-included Northern Ireland.

    Also, most of the name of the countries in the map lack the accents that we use currently TODAY in Portuguese; oddly, Azores is nowadays written as Açores.

    This map was made during the fascist portuguese government that lasted from the mid-20’s to 1974, and the break-up of the colonies (and their independence) contributed a great deal to the onset of the ‘74 revolution that ended that government. It is clearly, both in content and in design, a clear example of the fascist cultural system of Portugal.

    Comment by Gonçalo Justino — June 19, 2009 @ 3:04 pm

  34. @25
    I was going to point that out too, but you beat me to it. I’ve always wondered what situation we’d be in if we hadn’t obtained the lease on the New Territories. I don’t expect anyone in 1899 would have seen it as a future liability. If we’d also just stuck with HK Island and not obtained Kowloon as well I imagine it would probably still be a British colony. Or even independent. Though I suppose nothing would have been able to have been done if China decided it wanted HK back regardless.

    Comment by johnlelyonnais — June 23, 2009 @ 8:21 pm

  35. there are several mistakes in the text. Some where already pointed out by other commenters.

    Regarding Goa, Damão and Diu- Formerly “Estado da India”. Only Damão and Goa can be regarded as former Portuguese colonies (a territory taken by force from his inhabitants). Diu was a gift to the Portuguese in the XVI century and therefore India occupation in 1961 was illegal. At the time the UN did not support any of the 3 occupations by India.

    Macao was a leased territory as pointed above by Jorge. Lease ceased in 1999. It started as a rented territory 400 years ago. Then In 1887 the Chinese signed a treaty granting perpetual control of Macao to the Portuguese. In 1949 China considered the 1887 treaty not valid. The chinese communist regime was responsible for several riots in Macau until the end of the 60’s. In 1967 Portugal renounced to perpetual control of Macao. From 1976 on Macao was on a lease contract. The final agreement to hand it over to China was signed in 1987. There are some similarities with HongKong but not many. Maybe from 1976 on only.

    Regarding Brazil: Although Brazil was recognised as an independent state in 1822 it remained under Portuguese control. King Pedro was deposed by a military coup only in 1889. Ironically the main reason for the Portuguese king deposition was the abolition of slavery a year before. The dominant classes did not like it at all.

    Madeira, Azores and Cape Verde cannot be considered colonies at all. The 3 territories were uninhabited when discovered by Portuguese navigators. Portuguese settlers founded cities there. Cape Verde is currently an independent country. Today inhabitants are mainly descendants of black slaves.

    Comment by A.Ray — June 25, 2009 @ 11:34 am

  36. [...] Era um Pais Pequeno I’m crossposting this awesome map from the strangers (also see blogroll to yr right) which I somehow missed before boarding a plane to Portugal. [...]

    Pingback by Não Era um Pais Pequeno « Black Maps: science + politics + comics + maps — June 29, 2009 @ 11:28 pm

  37. Have you reckon’d a thousand acres much?have you reckon’d the earth much?
    Have you practis’d so long to learn to read?have you felt so proud to get at the meaning of poems?
    Walt Whitman
    Song of Myself

    Comment by Joana Ruas — June 30, 2009 @ 1:11 pm

  38. Inglaterra” (the double-r making an aspirated “H” sound) is the Portuguese name for England, used interchangeably with “O Reino Únido.”

    Comment by Morgan — July 10, 2009 @ 8:09 pm

  39. To me, this map is not so quaint, or “silly.” We here in the U.S. get the impression from grade school onward that we are solely responsible for the slave trade coming out of Africa and coming to the North American continent. The innovators, perpatrators, and purveyors were, historically, the Portuguese. To their credit, they were strong in ship-building and navigation, and so were the leading European country to regularly navigate, and develop “trade,” around the region of the African continent later to be known as the “Slave Coast.” This lead in “commerce” progressed to their role, along with other European countries, in colonizing regions of Africa. This map portrays the vestiges of that dirty business like scars on the skin of a slave portray the abusive history of the lash. I find geography and maps inherently fascinating. Sorry to spoil the reverie. But after reading John Reader’s Africa, I cannot look at a map like this without being reminded of the nascence of the export slave trade of Africans.

    Comment by MeToo — August 14, 2009 @ 3:07 pm

  40. this map shows old european borders (such as czechoslovakia and great romania).
    But anyway i didn`t knew that angola is huge
    (excuze my english i am romanian)

    Comment by raz — September 13, 2009 @ 5:11 pm

  41. my country never had an empire or any kind of colony not even 1 island

    Comment by raz — September 13, 2009 @ 5:12 pm

  42. This is great post, thanks!

    Comment by fotografo — September 14, 2009 @ 1:03 pm

  43. Just discovered your website and this post this Sunday a.m.; lost an hour to not only this great map but the fascinating, informative, and incisive comments from all–with their own great links. I may have lost an hour but I gained a great deal of knowledge and insight. @MeToo #39: how thoughtful to make the connection between the scars of European colonization and enslavement, and the last efforts of fascists to hold on to power.

    Comment by Mike C — October 4, 2009 @ 7:01 pm

  44. thanks

    Comment by 7daraje — October 14, 2009 @ 4:17 pm

  45. your site is an insult for portugal. shame on you

    Comment by shame — October 30, 2009 @ 12:38 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.