
The Bir Tawil Triangle is a desert of sand and rocks on the border between Egypt and the Sudan. It is also officially the most undesired territory in the world. Bir Tawil is the only piece of land on Earth (*) that is not claimed by any country – least of all by its neighbours. For either of them to claim the Bir Tawil Triangle would be to relinquish their claim to the Hala’ib Triangle. And while Hala’ib is also mainly rock and sand, it is not only ten times larger than Bir Tawil, but also adjacent to the Red Sea - so rather more interesting.
This bizarre situation started out with what is supposed to be the simplest of borders: a straight line. By the Condominium Treaty of 1899, the British drew the line between Egypt and what was then still known as the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan at the 22nd parallel north, resulting in a straight-line border of about 1,240 km (770 miles) from Libya to the Red Sea.
Straight-line borders are not uncommon in the sparsely populated Sahara desert, from Egypt all the way to Mauritania. But the border between Egypt and the Sudan apparently proved a bit too straight. In 1902, the Brits amended it in three places. A small area north of where the Nile crosses the border was handed over to Sudanese control on account of the local villages being more accessible from the south. The Wadi Halfa Salient is still Sudanese, but claimed by the Egyptians, who solved most of the problem by submerging all of the villages in the salient in Lake Nasser after the construction of the Aswan Dam.
The Bir Tawil Triangle, east of the Wadi Halfa Salient and south of the 22nd parallel, was handed over to Egypt because a tribe on the Egyptian side of the border used the area as grazing lands (Bir Tawil apparently means ‘water well’). Conversely, the Halaib Triangle, north of the 22nd parallel but touching Bir Tawil, went to Sudan because the locally dominant tribes were based in the Sudan.
Actually, Bir Tawil is less of a Triangle than a Trapezoid, its northern edge (the 22nd parallel) 95 km long and its southern edge, around 30 km to the south, 46 km long. Its total area is just over 2,000 km². The Hala’ib Triangle is about 20,500 km² in size.
De iure, the conflict between Egypt and the Sudan over Hala’ib and Bir Tawil is still unresolved, although Egypt has asserted itself as the de facto administrator of the larger of both areas in the 1990s. I have been unable to ascertain whether either country exerts any practical control over Bir Tawil, leaving open the exciting possibility that it is indeed the only officially ungoverned territory on Earth.


For being so remote and unwanted, it has good satellite pictures. I can get all the way down to the 100 ft scale in a lot it in Google Maps, which I can’t even do just east of me in suburban Memphis.
Comment by Beirne — June 28, 2009 @ 3:03 am
Gaza and the West Bank are also unclaimed (although not undesired).
Comment by itai — June 28, 2009 @ 5:55 am
@itai: I believe Arafat’s 1988 declaration of independence claims the entire British-mandated Palestine-Eretz-Israel (1923 lines) for “Palestine”, thus making it claimed.
Comment by יובל — June 28, 2009 @ 6:50 am
There is a map with a bit more detail at http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/maps/bs18.html
Comment by Eugene van der Pijll — June 28, 2009 @ 8:17 am
HA! The perfect place for all the Libertarians to go to create their paradise! I would be more than willing to contribute airfare to get rid of them!
Comment by EvilEuropean — June 28, 2009 @ 9:28 am
Very curious, Strange Maps.
Thanks for the explanation about.
Comment by El rano verde — June 28, 2009 @ 10:25 am
Bir means well. Bir Tawil must mean ‘high well’, but I’m not sure.
Comment by itisaai — June 28, 2009 @ 10:46 am
Gaza seems pretty undesired – note that the Israelis gave it up, moved out, freely and willingly. They offered it to the Egyptians, who declined.
Based on that, it would seem to me to be pretty undesired land (primarily because of the people living there, who neither country wants to deal with, more so than because of geographical or topographical undesirability)
Comment by toranosuke — June 28, 2009 @ 1:07 pm
There used to be a neutral zone between Iraq and Saudi Arabia which formed a strange diamond shaped area on maps. Apparently it was subsequently divided up by agreement.
Comment by owen b — June 28, 2009 @ 2:05 pm
I read about this on the Straight Dope, but had completely forgotten. The article is available at: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/785/whats-up-with-the-neutral-zones-near-saudi-arabia .
Comment by itai — June 28, 2009 @ 2:10 pm
I had always wondered about that border irregularity.
Comment by Lazar — June 28, 2009 @ 8:33 pm
What? I don’t get it? How does taking it mean they give up the other?
Comment by Tyr — June 28, 2009 @ 9:04 pm
@12 Tyr:
If Egypt claims Bir Tawil, that means they are recognizing the “crooked” border (not the straight line border on the 22nd parallel) and hence they lose the larger Hala’ib Triangle on the Red Sea. The opposite is true for Sudan: if they claim Bir Tawil, they are recognizing the 22nd parallel as the true border, and would lose the Hala’ib Triangle themselves.
Comment by boznia — June 28, 2009 @ 10:26 pm
@Tyr: Easy, Egypt claims the straight line border, which puts Halaib in their territory, and Tawil in Sudan’s. Sudan claims the non-straight line border, which puts Halaib in their territory, and Tawil in Egypt’s. So, like strangemaps titled this, it’s a case of “You take it – No you take it!” They can’t take both because, let’s say Egypt all of a sudden woke up one day and said they wanted both. Since, according to Egypt, taking Tawil will involve invading Sudan (since they see Tawil as Sudan’s), they’d have to declare an act of war on Sudan to take their territory. Of course Sudan wouldn’t mind, since they see Tawil as Egypt’s anyways, but to acknowledge the Sudanese stance on Tawil would mean to acknowledge the Sudanese stance on Haaib (ie that Egypt doesn’t own it.)
@itai I wouldn’t exactly call Gaza and the West Bank “unclaimed”, as toranosuke pointed out, Israel pretty much pulled out of it, although I don’t know who Israel acknowledges as owning Gaza, since Egypt didn’t want it and they don’t acknowledge a Palestinian state. As to the West Bank, two people claim it, the Palestinians want it for their territory, and Israel still actively administers it and claims it as theirs (which is why they build houses on their, police there, etc.) – whether or not they should isn’t the question here, what’s important is that Israel does claim it (as well as the Palestinians), so it is very much claimed.
Comment by David — June 28, 2009 @ 10:37 pm
Well, since it is officially unclaimed, and no one else seems to want it, I officially lay claim to the territory, which I now declare to be a sovereign state. I also declare myself to be absolute monarch (in absentia — even I don’t actually want to live there), and assert my rights to diplomatic status and sovereign immunity as a head of state. If anyone wants to apply for citizenship, please contact me — I am prepared to offer very reasonable tax rates, and a very loose dress code.
Comment by Greg — June 28, 2009 @ 11:18 pm
And the reason the chunk of land adjacent to the Red Sea is more interesting? It’s not just fishing rights – there’s a lot of natural gas drilling rights at stake off those disputed beaches.
Comment by hannah — June 29, 2009 @ 3:50 am
I now got it! Thanks!
Can you now clear up another confusing border between India and Pakista. What’s the deal with Kashmir?
Comment by Duboi — June 29, 2009 @ 6:28 am
[...] the always excellent Strange Maps: The Bir Tawil Triangle is a desert of sand and rocks on the border between Egypt and the Sudan. It [...]
Pingback by The Bir Tawil Trapezoid | The Arabist — June 29, 2009 @ 8:21 am
“No country officially occupies any part of Antarctica, but this is only because the 1959 Antarctic Treaty froze any existing territorial claims to the continent.”
This is true, but it is also true that there is a sector of Antarctica, Marie Byrd Land, that no country has ever claimed. It’s between longitudes 90°W and 150°W, or between the claims of Chile and New Zealand.
Comment by a modern major-general — June 29, 2009 @ 8:47 am
Searching for this Antarctic land I came upon the term terra nullius ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_nullius ), which might be applied to Bir Tawil.
(And yet another article of interest: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_territorial_disputes .)
Comment by itai — June 29, 2009 @ 9:05 am
Thx! Looking at maps, I knew these borders were disputed, but I didn’t know it was this interesting.
If water is readily available here, all one needs to add is solar power and an offshore bank to create a self-sufficient and permanent settlement.
But trying to claim independents for this area might not be such a good idea unless you want to wake up sleeping dogs.
It might be better to keep it disputed and its official name could be: “The Bir Tawil Autonomous Region of Either Egypt or Sudan Until Further Clarified”. Because for as long as Egypt and Sudan don’t reach a border settlement, this area will have a better chance of being left alone to do what ever it wants.
Comment by patrik — June 29, 2009 @ 1:23 pm
There is a small part of my cellar, with an earthen floor, that is unclaimed, if anybody wants it.
Comment by lordhutton — June 29, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
Not sure how I surfed into Strange Maps but I jsut wanted to drop a note and say how much I love it. I’m currently working my way through the archives.Keep up the great work.
Comment by tezby — June 30, 2009 @ 1:11 am
Not sure how I surfed into Strange Maps but I just wanted to drop a note and say how much I love it. I’m currently working my way through the archives. Keep up the great work.
Comment by tezby — June 30, 2009 @ 1:12 am
Is Bir Tawil uninhabited? I don’t see any structures or roads on Google Maps’ aerial views.
Peter
Comment by ironrailsironweights — June 30, 2009 @ 2:10 am
“What’s the deal with Kashmir?”
I’ll have a go but this is a little contentious, to say the least. Both countries claim it although the former princely state of Kashmir is split between India and Pakistan, with the borders based on the ceasfire line. At some stage both countries will probably agree to accept this as the legal border although this hasn’t happened yet.
India has the better legal claim because at independence its Hindu Maharajah joined India (rulers of those areas of India not directly ruled by the British could choose which country to join, they did not have a choice to choose neither). However, a majority of Kashmiris would probably choose Pakistan if given a choice which they won’t be as India regards its earlier promise to submit the decision to a plebiscite as superceded by the Shimla Agreement.
India’s view that the decision of the prince should be the only determinant is perhaps slightly contradicted by the case of Hyderabad. In constrast to Kashmir, this State had a majority hindu population but muslim ruler. To prevent him joining Pakistan the Indians invaded.
In any case, the legal niceties are irrelevant. The Indians will never give up what they hold of Kashmir unless the Indian Union falls apart which looks pretty unlikely.
Comment by iolanthe — June 30, 2009 @ 3:06 am
Note that the border between Egypt and Sudan is NOT a straight line: it runs along a parallel, which ‘in the field’ is a curved line. Although it does appear straight on most map projections, you wouldn’t be able to drive your car (or camel) in a straight line over it.
Comment by Martijn — June 30, 2009 @ 9:59 am
I can assure you that the Bir Tawil triangle is indeed claimed, as of my reading this article! If Egypt and the Sudan don’t want it, Old Rectoryland is perfectly happy to step in and take an African territory for its Empire…
Comment by King Dominic — June 30, 2009 @ 11:12 am
@ iolanthe Thanks. Though I have Indian and Pakistani colleagues I back out a little on this topic.
Comment by Duboi — June 30, 2009 @ 1:06 pm
We’ll have it! Micronations everywhere should unite and claim a piece of this land for an embassy : )
Comment by Holly Davies — June 30, 2009 @ 5:55 pm
Ok, now i get it. Egypt claims the straight line, without Bir Tawil and with Hala’ib. Sudan claims the non-straight line also without Bir Tawil and with Hala’ib. So they both claim Hala’ib and nobody claims Bir Tawil. I guess if some country really wanted, they could claim Bir Tawil.
Comment by Drester — June 30, 2009 @ 6:57 pm
Nobody is saying Bir Tawil is up for grabs. Egypt says it belongs to the Sudan, while the Sudan lays ownership at Egypt’s doorstep. This doesn’t exactly translate as: “Pull up your double-wide and make yourself at home!”
Comment by Terry — July 1, 2009 @ 6:10 pm
in other words, the british screwed up everything.
“bir tawil” means “deep well.”
Comment by kato — July 1, 2009 @ 8:36 pm
I think most of Somalia is ungoverned…
Comment by Péter — July 2, 2009 @ 8:28 pm
[...] The Bir Tawil Trapezoid [...]
Pingback by Links of the Day (7/5/09) | my five year plan. — July 5, 2009 @ 4:34 pm
[...] Republished from Strange Maps. June 28, 209. [...]
Pingback by “You take it – No, you take it”: the Bir Tawil Trapezoid (StrangeMaps) « Kelso’s Corner — July 10, 2009 @ 11:00 am
Hey, my comment’s been deleted! Why? There wasn’t any spam!
Comment by Holly Davies — July 17, 2009 @ 7:14 pm
Thanks for this entry on the Hala’ib triangle. In the early 1980’s I worked in this area for 3 years, and it is indeed inhabited and claimed by local Beja (bishariin) tribal groups. Here are several entries from my blog, on the Beja:
http://dianabuja.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&post=148
http://dianabuja.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&post=187
http://dianabuja.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&post=395
Dianabuja, Burundi
Comment by dianabuja — August 13, 2009 @ 12:35 pm
OOps, the above links won’t work! I gave the edit links! Here are the correct ones:
http://dianabuja.wordpress.com/2009/07/03/coffee-rituals-camel-shins-ostrich-brochettes-the-beja-tribes-of-eastern-sudan-egypt/
http://dianabuja.wordpress.com/2009/07/04/coffee-rituals-camel-shins-ostrich-brochettes-the-beja-tribes-of-eastern-sudan-egypt-part-ii/
http://dianabuja.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/food-and-folk-cures-i-of-iii/
Comment by dianabuja — August 13, 2009 @ 12:57 pm
[...] the base there exceed any strategic benefit. (On a side note, I just learned there is actually a small area between Sudan and Egypt that is both uninhabited and unclaimed. If you want it, it’s yours. Or, one of these cities could be put [...]
Pingback by Paul Romer’s “Charter Cities” « UNL Political Science Graduate Student Blog — August 15, 2009 @ 2:15 am
This is nonsense, The entire Sudan till late 50s was under the Egyptian crown rule.. It wasn’t till prez nasser post revolution that Egypt ceded the entire country of Sudan favoring it to become an independent soverign state..
Therefore if Egypt chooses it could just seize both territories without further ado .. sense Sudan itself seems to be a failed state with the south awaiting referrendum to seceed from north and Darfur has many repel groups who favor secession from Sudan as well…
I think Sudan eventually in the greater scheme of things would not fuss too much about it’s much stronger, larger and more stable neihbour to North asserting control and sovereginty over these two region… I think the tribes oo would opt for Egyptian nationality rather than Sudanese for any semplance of services…
Having said that, I can not agree more with the poster above , who pointed to the UK’s handiwork in this border mess ,pretty much like everywhere else the Brit left their ugly touch in what used to be part of the Colonial Empire..
Comment by Troy — September 13, 2009 @ 12:55 pm
Troy – Sudan might not ‘fuss too much’ if Egypt took over the triangle – but the tribes certainly would!
The ambiguity created by the current situation suits well the seasonal and longer-term movements of Beja in the area, both to and from the Sudan.
And as Hannah mentions, above, there are possible natural gas sources and also a variety of minerals in the hills. Not to mention the fish. All of which, both countries would certainly like permanently.
When I was working there in the 1980’s, we came across military from both countries in the triangle.
http://dianabuja.wordpress.com/2009/07/04/coffee-rituals-camel-shins-ostrich-brochettes-the-beja-tribes-of-eastern-sudan-egypt-part-ii/
Comment by dianabuja — September 14, 2009 @ 11:43 am
Dianabuja.. I was stationed in Aswan – EG Air force- in the mid 90s.. I have been to the area and familiar with tribes there as well..
I’m also familiar with the quick over night and following all day skirmishes -not personally but known from colleauges first hand accounts- that sent the Sudanese security/Adminstrative force and the humble next day reinforcements back across the border, Never to come back again!
Sudan Gov. lodged complaints and half hearted political efforts, but were mired in other more pressing internal issues in the south at the time.. so not much has been registered..
As for the tribes I can assure you this also from personal accounts , they continue to traverse the border as they have done for centeuries unopposed by borders or claims..but they are 100% for the Egyptian affiliation just much like the tribes of Nuba closer to the Nile valley have favored Egyptian affiliation rather than Sudanese..And yet they traverse the border freely today between the two countries and their movment is entirely limited to their hisortic patten of movment in that particular region..
Similar tribal movement can be found dispite different national affiliation today in that part of the world on daily basis ..
between Syria/Saudi Arabia/Jordan and to some extent Iraq till the war… I tell you this with a 100% certainty..
Comment by Troy — September 16, 2009 @ 9:31 am
Bir Tawil does not mean “water well.” “Bir” means “well” in Arabic and “Tawil” means “tall,” so it’s the “tall well.”
I noticed the “water well” translation comes from Wikipedia. Have you not learned your lesson about using Wikipedia, particularly for translations?
Comment by hob — October 13, 2009 @ 7:19 pm
‘Bir Tawil’ means ‘High’ or ‘Tall Well’, in this case obviously referring to depth.
Comment by Oren — October 25, 2009 @ 9:20 pm
[...] moon off-limits. But your fledgling nation still has a couple of choices of unclaimed land parcels: Bir Tawil between Egypt and Sudan, and Marie Byrd Land (lower left) in Antarctica. Bir Tawil, meaning [...]
Pingback by Unclaimed land « Dance4 — November 13, 2009 @ 6:55 pm
@Duboi
In Kashmir the situation is made more complex yet by the fact China invaded in 1962 and still holds the Aksai Chin region that it claims is part of Tibet and India claims as part of Jammu & Kashmir.
Most maps in the West show actual the lines of actual control by Pakistan and China, but when sold in India they have disclaimers attached to them to the effect that the geographical boundaries depicted are not accurate.
Pakistan controls a greater area of Kashmir than India but most of that is hilly and mostly useless terrain, whereas India has the “good bits” like the Valley of Srinagar. India offered to settle on the basis of the line of control, but Pakistan claims all of Kashmir.
Both countries fought a shooting war as recently as 1999 in Kargil, which was (and is) of serious concern to the international community since both India and Pakistan are nuclear powers.
I used to think the main reason why India wanted to hang on to Kashmir was because Nehru’s family is of Kashmiri origin, but the Ganges’ source is in Kashmir, and this has more to do with control over water, just as Egypt and Sudan have conflicts over control of the Nile (Egypt warned Sudan that any attempt to divert water from the Nile would be a casus belli).
Comment by Fazal Majid — November 27, 2009 @ 3:48 am