Strange Maps

July 17, 2009

400 – Japanese Whispers: Mapping the Forbidden Outside World

Filed under: Uncategorized — strangemaps @ 12:57 am

japmap

For two centuries after 1640, the official Japanese policy towards the outside world was known as sakoku (‘closed country’), by which both Japanese leaving the country and foreigners entering it could expect the death penalty.

Although not quite as harshly absolute as that, isolationism prevailed until American commodore Matthew Perry’s Black Fleet sailed into Uraga harbour in 1853, forcing Japan to open up, first to commerce with the US, later to trade with other western countries.

This Japanese world map circa 1850, gives an impression of the country’s view of its place in the world on the verge of its forced reintegration into the international community. It is an intriguing mix of foreign knowledge and native perspective.

The Japanese archipelago is placed self-confidently at the centre of the map, banishing Europe from its usual central place to a marginal one, at the western edge. The American continent is banished to the map’s far eastern side.

The continents, each assigned a different colour, are generally in the right position vis-a-vis each other, but their contours are very poorly rendered, as if the map was not drawn directly from a contemporary western example, but via a system of Chinese whispers.

  • Europe is an elongated mess, the Black Sea landlocked, the Greek peninsula melted, the British Isles fragmented into multiple rocks the very presence of which has smoothed out the continent’s northwestern shores to an almost straight line from Biarritz to Hamburg.
  • Africa is intersected by giant rivers morphing into two fabulous (and fabulated) inland seas; South Africa’s Natal region is placed on its own island. Madagascar had bent out of shape, its northern cape aiming at a clutter of too-large islands.
  • the Red Sea is coloured red, but the Arabian peninsula is coloured in as part of Europe – not to mention triangle-shaped. The Indian subcontinent (which actually is triangle-shaped) is rendered as a tired, sagging lump of land, much smaller than the huge Indochinese land mass.
  • Unless one generously discerns the St Lawrence River in the giant wound gaping in North America’s eastern side, that continent shows hardly any resemblance to its actual shape (South America is shown much more realistically).
  • By 1850, the British were busy colonising Australia, but this map still presupposed the area to be barely visited, showing it as a confused, semi-discovered muddle of land, attached to the Southland – the mythical Terra Australis Incognita of ancient – western – lore.

However flawed it may be, what this map proves by getting the general gist of the world’s geography right,  is that Japan was not entirely cut off from outside knowledge. Indeed, during the whole period of sakoku, severely restricted but nonetheless significant trading and other contacts were maintained with a handful of privileged partners.

The Dutch, who were allowed to maintain a foothold on the small island of Deshima, were Japan’s main source for western scientific knowledge, including cartography. This allowed Japan to keep up with the general development of geography, even if sometimes, as in this case, only very generally.

Many thanks to An Olaerts for providing me with this link to a series of antique Japanese world maps.

.

NB: this is the 400th entry on Strange Maps, and if that isn’t enough to feel at least a bit festive, it will (most likely) coincide with the 12 millionth hit on the blog. Add to that the fact that the publication date of the Strange Maps book is approaching, and there’s three whole reasons to be cheerful. My thanks to all readers, commenters and contributors to this blog!

 

 

 


49 Comments »

  1. Congratulations.

    And a link from another wonderful blog: http://bibliodyssey.blogspot.com/2009/06/satirical-maps.html

    Comment by marcosfaria — July 17, 2009 @ 1:09 am

  2. This map shows Australia as a set of peninsulas of the Great Southern Continent (Terra Australis) as was done on sixteenth century European maps, maybe up to Tasman’s 1642 voyage.
    Comparison with European maps (see http://alabamamaps.ua.edu/historicalmaps/world/before1700.html
    for examples) might reveal a source two or three hundred years out of date.

    Comment by Dan Milton — July 17, 2009 @ 1:18 am

  3. Weren’t the Dutch excellent map makers? Why wouldn’t the Japanese have better maps than this?

    Comment by Thom Peters — July 17, 2009 @ 1:42 am

  4. I don’t see the map quite as “flawed”, but rather, upon my first seeing it and before reading past paragraph 3, my first thought was “Holy Sapporo! That’s a pretty darned good map for having just come out of isolation!” It reminds me heavily of the maps of the world from the 16th century (when Europe was “just coming out of isolation” as it were, recognizing that there was another continent out there) and their cartographic skills are very much in line with that. Of course, being the Japanese, a) they learned faster (the 16th century European maps had a head start in that much of the “Old World” was already known”, but this map shows much better knowledge), b) they caught up quicker (in 1850, Western maps were much more advanced than this example, close to modern maps, yet in the intervening 150 years, Japanese cartography went from 16th century standards to 21st century standards, while we just went from 19th century standards to 21st century standards. Like Japanese industry catching up from being virtually non-existent 65 years ago to the dyanmic powerhouse it is now, whereas Western industry was pretty dynamic at the close of WWII.)

    This map tells a lot about Japan and their culture!

    (And, will hit number 12,000,000 get a free copy of the book? I’d be willing to visit much more often (if that were possible)!)

    Comment by David Kendall — July 17, 2009 @ 1:43 am

  5. This type of Pacific-centric map, where Europe is on the left edge and the Americas are on the right, is quite common here in Asia today. In this regard, the above map appears “normal” to me. :)

    Comment by JDsg — July 17, 2009 @ 1:49 am

  6. @JDsg: And it’s not uncommon here in the US to see maps that place the Americas at the center. I don’t like them at all; they seem hopelessly parochial to me.

    Comment by Lazar — July 17, 2009 @ 3:42 am

  7. It seems fair enough to put one’s own country at the middle of a world map – European maps have Americas on left, Asian maps have Americas on right. Americas in the middle does break Eurasia in half.

    I don’t like unbalanced Mercator maps that use a lot of their space on the Arctic with the Equator well below half way.

    Comment by Eric — July 17, 2009 @ 3:58 am

  8. Congrat! I’ve been reading for a few years now.

    I remember when I studied in the Netherlands we had a map of the world with Australia in the center, which I thought was weird, what with the gigantic Pacific Ocean in the middle. It had been left there by an Aussie student a few years before. However upon returning to the states I noticed that quite a few maps I saw had the Americas in the middle and the Eurasian continent divided. People always think of themselves in the middle.

    Comment by lekkermeisje — July 17, 2009 @ 6:21 am

  9. Congrats, this is one of the only blogs I frequent.

    Comment by Lakeman — July 17, 2009 @ 6:46 am

  10. Brilliant! Saudi Arabia appears as part of Europe because at the time it was part of the Ottoman Empire, a state firmly considered to be within a European geopolitical context.

    Comment by marioscy — July 17, 2009 @ 9:13 am

  11. Great link, as always!

    Congratulations on your 400th post. Your blog is really inspirational to me, keep it going! Thanks

    Comment by Jeffrey — July 17, 2009 @ 10:17 am

  12. @mariosc: The Ottoman Empire never conquered the area now know as Saudi Arabia.

    Comment by Unlucky Irish — July 17, 2009 @ 12:36 pm

  13. Going to the website and look at the 1796 map. It is much closer to reality so they had much better knowledge. Don’t forget that Japan imported Dutch books and maps at that time.

    About the intrepretation of Europe. I think what you think is part of Britain is in fact Zeeland and Holland.

    Comment by charly — July 17, 2009 @ 1:51 pm

  14. Most of Saudi Arabia is desert and aproximatedly uninhabited. If it wasn’t for oil it wouldn’t really be mapped

    Comment by charly — July 17, 2009 @ 1:54 pm

  15. Odd that Denmark has made it in – and so prominently enlarged, too.

    Comment by Sili — July 17, 2009 @ 2:59 pm

  16. Deshima is, I think, one of the most interesting places in the history of the world. Besides what you already noted:

    - It’s an artificial island, specifically built to for the purpose of isolating the Dutch.

    - After Japan was opened, it was built up and became Japan’s first modern naval base. The first natively-built Japanese steamship was built there.

    - It’s in Nagasaki, so all of that history has been mostly forgotten in the shadow of August 9th, 1945.

    Comment by Paul Drye — July 17, 2009 @ 4:34 pm

  17. many congrats. love this blog. bring on the book!

    Comment by gerard — July 17, 2009 @ 10:52 pm

  18. Truly a very interesting map!

    One suspects the Dutch influence may explain the Natal “island” – Dutch trading posts may have appeared as islands.

    The only slight surprise for me is that Japan is not rendered larger on the map.

    I think the continental colouring is interesting in light of Japan’s later policy of the Greater Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere. Is there an idea here that each continent might naturally have a dominant country?

    Comment by marisbo — July 18, 2009 @ 2:37 am

  19. I’m quite excited for the upcoming book!!!

    Any link to a possible translation of the text accompanying the map??

    Comment by David — July 18, 2009 @ 5:12 am

  20. [...] μμ on Ιουλίου 18, 2009 | # | 0 Tags:Geography, History, Japan 400 – Japanese Whispers: Mapping the Forbidden Outside World For two centuries after 1640, the official Japanese policy towards the outside world was known as [...]

    Pingback by 400 – Japanese Whispers: Mapping the Forbidden Outside World « Fire EXIT — July 18, 2009 @ 9:02 am

  21. [...] Japanese Whispers: Mapping the Forbidden Outside World [...]

    Pingback by Jay Lake: [links] Link salad for a San Francisco weekend — July 18, 2009 @ 7:34 pm

  22. “banishing Europe from its usual central place to a marginal one” seems like an exaggeration. Surely the is no correct place. Banishing must be in the eyes of the beholder.

    Thanks for the interesting maps and comments!

    Comment by EJ — July 18, 2009 @ 7:52 pm

  23. Interesting that California’s Channel Islands make the cut, yet Alaska has vanished.

    Comment by Sam Huddy — July 19, 2009 @ 12:17 am

  24. Grand Congratulations on your accomplishments and Hooray for the 400, 12 million, and one book to come! Thank you for doing this, I have greatly enjoyed my travels.

    Comment by Sara — July 19, 2009 @ 12:43 am

  25. Congratulations on the 400th post and all the other impending benchmarks. I absolutely love your blog, thank you for it. Keep up the good work.

    Comment by Gabe — July 19, 2009 @ 10:49 pm

  26. The Rangaku page (“Dutch Learning”) shows a much more accurate map, which dates from 1792. It can be found here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ChikyuZenzu1792.jpg

    Comment by Frank — July 20, 2009 @ 2:58 am

  27. Does anyone agree that japan itself is rendered very poorly ? Which if true, is surprising.

    Comment by Guillaume Caillaud — July 20, 2009 @ 8:20 am

  28. This type of Pacific-centric map, where Europe is on the left edge and the Americas are on the right, is quite common here in Asia today. In this regard, the above map appears “normal” to me. :)

    Comment by home insurance — July 20, 2009 @ 4:03 pm

  29. Congratulations. Some comments:

    (1) Perhaps the poor detail and distortion is largely due not to ignorance of the outside world but to the purpose for which the map was intended. Because of the closed country policy, the Japanese would have had no need for navigational maps or others requiring any real precision. If anybody could translate the text…

    (2) World maps centered approximately on the UK or Japan have the benefit of keeping the large populated land masses intact. For most people and purposes, I think it would be more desirable to split the oceans than the continents.

    (3) Are those green mounds intended to be mountain ranges? If so, the selection is very odd.

    Comment by X — July 20, 2009 @ 4:55 pm

  30. i love this site. one of my fav posts is the san francisco bay area made with hands. i think banished is a bit harsh as well. civilisations always think of themselves as the center of the world. look at howthe romans call the med sea, ‘mare nostrum’ or saul steinberg’s view from 9th ave. in fact the chinese word for china is not ‘china’ at all, it translates to ‘middle kingdom’. arrogance? not really. asia-centric world view. not hardly. but when you’re isolated from the world for 4000 years, its easy to see how your coutrty is the center of the world.

    Comment by Stephen — July 20, 2009 @ 6:40 pm

  31. Congrats on the 400th, and I see that you’ve topped 12 million. Holy crap. Pour some water on the server.

    Comment by Terry — July 20, 2009 @ 6:50 pm

  32. I love these old examples of wrong geography.
    I wish there would be more modern renderings of them though.

    Comment by Tyr — July 21, 2009 @ 12:59 pm

  33. Absolutely fascinating! From 1850, no less! I’ve seen some contemporary Japanese maps that still place Japan at the center but of course they’re geographically correct. Very cool post.

    Comment by ieatmypigeon — July 21, 2009 @ 5:29 pm

  34. Whats even stranger than pacific centered maps are southpole on top maps. North is north but does it always have to be up? Anyways triple congrats.

    Comment by JDmoney — July 21, 2009 @ 10:22 pm

  35. ISTM that North America is not all that distorted. The Gulf of California and Gulf of Mexico are clearly shown, with the general “triangle” form. There is an inland sea in the north for Hudson’s Bay, and the “eastern gash” corresponds to the Gulf of St. Lawrence. There also appears to be shapes corresponding to the bight centered on New York.

    Perhaps the most interesting thing about this map is the lines of latitude and longitude: the latter curved in some geometric projection. That’s a pretty advanced concept, ISTM. What is the projection, and did they develop it themselves?

    Comment by Rich Rostrom — July 22, 2009 @ 1:02 am

  36. [...] store visits from laptop hunters? Japanese map of the world from 1850 July 22, 2009 Sweet (via [...]

    Pingback by Japanese map of the world from 1850 « Sharing the truth one thread at a time — July 22, 2009 @ 1:16 am

  37. I don’t think it’s fair to say that Europe and the US are ‘banished’ to other sides of the map rather than being in the centre- why should those countries be in the middle? It’s not done as an insult.

    Comment by Living — July 22, 2009 @ 3:22 am

  38. ISTM that North America is not all that distorted. The Gulf of California and Gulf of Mexico are clearly shown, with the general “triangle” form. There is an inland sea in the north for Hudson’s Bay, and the “eastern gash” corresponds to the Gulf of St. Lawrence. There also appears to be shapes corresponding to the bight centered on New York.

    Furthermore, one can make out the Yucatan, Cuba, the mouth of the Mississippi, and the generally westward-facing pointness of the Alaskan coast and the Aleutians. You can even see Baffin Island, I think. Not too bad, considering.

    Comment by Ars Sine Artificio — July 22, 2009 @ 4:09 am

  39. the writer of this article seems to like putting random words in bold.

    Comment by anymouse — July 22, 2009 @ 5:17 am

  40. I have to agree with a few comments here, that this map is really not all that strange. By modern standards, it might be oddly-oriented or inaccurate. However, I have a modern accurate map right on the wall here with the Pacific Ocean as the central point. It’s not odd to believe that it should be so. The Pacific Ocean is the largest and East Asia contains some of the most productive economies in the world today. I see no reason it shouldn’t be considered the center of the world. Now, an Antarctic-centric map- that would be weird!

    Comment by Radicalcontra — July 22, 2009 @ 6:15 am

  41. As you can see in the link they do have very accurate maps from that time. This one especially: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2443/3723997571_1165a5ba95_b.jpg.

    Comment by Drester — July 24, 2009 @ 12:24 pm

  42. I mean his one:
    http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2443/3723997571_1165a5ba95_b.jpg

    Comment by Drester — July 24, 2009 @ 12:25 pm

  43. [...] Una stupenda mappa rivelata del giappone dopo il periodo di chiusura totale al mondo il famoso “sakoku”, dal 1640 al 1840 in cui qualsiasi giapponese fuggisse o qualsiasi straniero tentava di entrare lo attendeva la pena di morte.[fonte strangemaps) [...]

    Pingback by La visione del mondo dopo l’apertura del giappone del 1850 | Youkoso Italia - Il ponte virtuale tra Giappone ed Italia — July 24, 2009 @ 4:14 pm

  44. “Chinese Whispers?” Come on, can’t we just call the game “telephone?”

    Comment by Andrew Liebchen — August 1, 2009 @ 2:37 pm

  45. Fenerbahce Taraftar Site

    Comment by TrakyaFB — August 21, 2009 @ 2:50 pm

  46. It seems this map is based on the world map that Matteo Ricci drew for the Chinese in 1585 – see http://courses.essex.ac.uk/LT/LT361/images/world%20maps/ricci_1585.jpg. Still, the Ricci map is of better quality in various places, most peculiarly even for Japan itself.

    Comment by André — September 12, 2009 @ 6:38 am

  47. [...] le web. Avec un blog comme celui de Strange Maps, nous avons accès à toutes sortes de cartes : anciennes, informatives, originales… On y trouve même une carte des suicides du Golden Bridge, qui ont [...]

    Pingback by Les cartes de Dan Meth « Mpj2009's Blog — November 6, 2009 @ 11:13 am

  48. I’ve got a similar japanese map that is much more accurate (still a little out of shape for Australia) but uses the exact same continent colours and styles. It has no known date though.

    Comment by Ian — November 9, 2009 @ 9:27 pm

  49. J-Cutie: Ancient map?

    Comment by J-Cutie — December 6, 2009 @ 10:11 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.