
Faith and reason, usually jostling for primacy over one another, unite on this map to describe [t]he Earth-sphere after the Deluge in its broken state, shown with Mountains and valleys, great Sea-Bosom and Islands and Shallows of the same. The map was produced for Willem and Jan Goeree’s (1) immensely popular book Introductions to Biblical Knowledge (2), and apparently is based on a similar hemisphere map illustrating Thomas Burnet’s Sacred History of the World (3).
Burnet’s is an interesting book, the first British attempt to marry rational and biblical explanations for the genesis of the world. It typifies a wider attempt to unantagonise the progress of science with the doctrines of faith, by looking for natural rather than supernatural mechanisms behind divine intervention (4).
The problem, in this case at least, is that Burnet did so merely by faith in science, unburdened by any actual scientific facts. Burnet speculated that Noah’s Flood was only possible by the emergence of water from the earth’s hollow interior (a very popular and persistent misconception, see #85).
Burnet was quite selective in which pseudoscientific theories he found acceptable. When Isaac Newton suggested to him that the days might have been longer during Creation Week (supposedly to explain for the loads of work God got done), Burnet objected: the Supreme Being would not bend Nature’s laws.
As per Burnet’s example, this hemispherical presentation by the Goerees of the post-Flood continents shows, in a lighter blue, plenty of areas throughout the oceans which used to be dry land before the Deluge. The (non-existent) polar lands, Europe and Africa are linked by the light-blue areas, which also extend in all directions from Africa, and generally connect all now separate land masses to each other (did Burnet and the Goerees perhaps think this might explain why men and beasts live in places like America and Australia, isolated by vast expanses of water from the rest of the world?)
The Goeree map is also an interesting snapshot of Europe’s geographic knowledge in the late 17th century, which with all its misconceptions was approaching something resembling our present vision of the continents, having moved away from the purely symbolic tryptich maps (more on those at #87). Notable errors include the Arctic lands (see also #116), California as an island (see also #71), the sea where Alaska should be, the attachment of Greenland to what seems to be a Canadian mainland, of Australia to New Guinea.
Many thanks to peacay over at the ever excellent BibliOdyssey for sending in this map. Image found here on Old World Auctions, where a copy of the map recently sold for $375.
———–
(1) A Dutch father-and-son publishing team. Interestingly, their family name is that of a former island in the Dutch river delta (possibly their family’s ancestral home); the name of which was transplanted by Dutch seafarers to the island of Goree, just off the Senegalese coast, which has become a symbol of the transatlantic slave trade.
(3) In the original Dutch: Voor-Bereidselen Tot de Bybelsche Wysheid (1690).
(3) In the original Latin: Telluris Theoria Sacra (1681). First English edition in 1684.
(4) In the same vein, Burnet would later postulate that the Fall of Man might not have been an actual historical event, but rather a symbolic one.


I enjoy that one of the Google ads that appears on this page is “Need Flood Protection?”.
Comment by saratoday — November 2, 2009 @ 4:21 am
I’ve got: “Help find the next cure for malaria Support science recycling”
Science recycling?
Comment by Terry — November 2, 2009 @ 11:38 am
Interesting: The arcitc region was supposed to be dry land, whereas Antarctica was not known yet…
Comment by Achim — November 2, 2009 @ 12:03 pm
[...] Nice: Faith, Science and the Flood http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/421-faith-science-and-the-flood/ [...]
Pingback by Carles Bellver (carles) 's status on Monday, 02-Nov-09 17:33:34 UTC - Identi.ca — November 2, 2009 @ 5:33 pm
That link to #85 should be http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/85-inside-the-hollow-earth/
Comment by Dale — November 2, 2009 @ 6:23 pm
What are the intersecting lines and why are they only on the Western Hemisphere?
Comment by Gus Snarp — November 2, 2009 @ 7:38 pm
@ Dale (#5):
Corrected, thanks.
@ Gus Snarp (#6):
Good point. Don’t know. Anyone?
Comment by strangemaps — November 2, 2009 @ 10:15 pm
Zoom in on this map at full resolution: http://seadragon.com/view/f1q
Comment by Dan Cory — November 3, 2009 @ 3:33 am
There are 16 points equally spaced around the circle, and lines drawn joining all of them. Makes a nice pattern, but doesn’t represent anything.
On the western map, it looks like they had a vague idea of New Zealand being there, but they weren’t that sure.
Comment by Eric — November 3, 2009 @ 7:36 am
The Northernmost point is represented on the Eastern hemisphere (the dotted line). Does this imply a similar grid in place, just not depicted? Also interesting is that the Southernmost point is depicted (in the Western hemisphere) by a larger circle (again, the dotted line) than the Northernmost point.
Comment by Terry — November 3, 2009 @ 12:16 pm
[...] Faith, Science and the Flood — Strange Maps with some religious history. My favorite bit is the phrase “great Sea-Bosom”. [...]
Pingback by Jay Lake: [links] Link salad wakes up in its own bed for a change — November 3, 2009 @ 1:15 pm
@Eric (#9)- I’m not convinced that the lines are meaningless. The concepts of latitude and longitude were not unknown, and the horizontal lines could well be latitude. Given the difficulty of measuring longitude, perhaps the other lines represent some attempt at an alternative system? I’m reaching here, but I can’t see someone drawing these lines just for fun.
Comment by Gus Snarp — November 3, 2009 @ 3:59 pm
[...] leave a comment » Strange Maps posted about a very interesting, historic map. [...]
Pingback by Faith in Geography « clear reality — November 3, 2009 @ 5:47 pm
Those intersecting lines are common on maps of the era (but this is the first time I’ve seen them used on one hemisphere only, the other lacking them). They are used for navigation. (Don’t ask me how, I was born 500 years too late).
Comment by David Kendall — November 3, 2009 @ 10:21 pm
This really is an interesting map, as it shows seamounts and continental shelves long before I’d've thought people were really aware of them. I don’t think that the map maker just created this submarine topology here willy nilly. I see that the Walvis Ridge is shown (a fat one anyway) and that the Agulhas Fracture zone is depicted distinct from its surroundings also. Fascinating. And notice that the western hemisphere is severely lacking in submarine detail, probably because the creator here was trying to include what he knew, rather than postulating that some land attached to the continents is submerged. What a fun map.
Comment by nygdan — November 4, 2009 @ 5:26 pm
The lines are probably to make it look like a Portolan chart.
Comment by boscodagama — November 5, 2009 @ 3:24 pm
In a way, Goeree is still an island: it is now connected to its former neighbour and called Goeree-Overflakkee.
Check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goeree-Overflakkee
Comment by Suzanna — November 6, 2009 @ 4:00 pm
Thanx alot for this post
مدونة
Comment by مدونة — November 9, 2009 @ 11:08 am
[...] a comment » This is brought to you by Strange Maps [...]
Pingback by Map of the Week (8) « clear reality — November 9, 2009 @ 11:01 pm
The Goerees were not mapmakers, which is why they copied Burnet’s map, and probably poorly. I would like to see Burnet’s.
The continental outlines are so generalized (I’m sure obvious, missing features appeared on contemporary maps) and misshapen that it’s clear that they were not drawn with care. The mountain chains (as on medieval maps) and the apparent ocean shallows are merely decorative, as are the intersecting lines over the western hemisphere.
The lines originate at the source of the 16 major winds of the ancient sailors of the Mediterranean and developed into the medieval Portolano chart. The Goerees and Burnet didn’t know this, and neither did most mapmakers of the end of the 17th century.
Comment by iakon — November 10, 2009 @ 12:14 am
Another amazing map! Got me thinking about science and faith and again, but I won’t go there right now. thanks.
Comment by Atlanta Roofing Company — November 12, 2009 @ 12:49 pm